similar to: virsh cannot list broken guest.

Hi, I am using 2.6.36.3 kernel with btrfs, 512MB memory and a very slow disk, no special options for mounting btrfs except noatime. Now I found it very slow. When I rm a 5GB movie, it took 20 secs. -- 竹密岂妨流水过 山高哪阻野云飞 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at

Hi, This is a Centos 5.5 host with one xen guest. About 2 weeks ago, the host randomly lost network connection. By this I mean I could not connect to the services on it, or ping it. Also was the status of the guest. From serial console, I connected to the host, trying to see what happened. No clue (any error messages) in messages or dmesg. ifdown/ifup the interface did not help, either. Only

Hi, This is a Centos 5.5 host with one xen guest. About 2 weeks ago, the host randomly lost network connection. By this I mean I could not connect to the services on it, or ping it. Also was the status of the guest. From serial console, I connected to the host, trying to see what happened. No clue (any error messages) in messages or dmesg. ifdown/ifup the interface did not help, either. Only

I'm targeting a language that uses virtual registers and not physical registers. So the easiest way to implement this is to use virtual registers, except that they are being restarted after each function and clobbering registers in previous functions. For example: start function 0 r1024 = mov %var0.0 r1025 = mov %var0.1 lots of intermediate code call function1 w/ 3 parameters more

On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, David Greene wrote: > As I work toward improving LLVM register allocation, I've > come across the need to do some refactoring. cool. :) One request: Evan is currently out on vacation until Monday. This is an area that he is very interested in and will want to chime in on. Please don't start anything drastic until he gets back :). > Specifically, I would

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, David Greene wrote: >> As I work toward improving LLVM register allocation, I've >> come across the need to do some refactoring. > > cool. :) One request: Evan is currently out on vacation until Monday. > This is an area that he is very interested in and will want to chime in > on. Please don't start anything

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote: > The mov to r1024 in function 1 clobbers the data from function 0. The only > ways I can think to get around this, is to push every virtual register used > in a function to a stack or some internal data structure and then pull them > back out for each function call. Just to double-check, are you

On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Christopher Lamb wrote: >>> The issue I'm having is that there is no extract/insert >>> instruction in the ISA, it's simply based on using subregister >>> operands in subsequent/preliminary instructions. At the pointer of >>> custom lowering register allocation has not yet been done, so I >>> don't have a way to

On Apr 23, 2007, at 1:43 PM, Christopher Lamb wrote: > On Apr 23, 2007, at 1:17 PM, Christopher Lamb wrote: > >> On Apr 23, 2007, at 12:31 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Christopher Lamb wrote: >>>> How can one let the back end know how to insert and extract >>>> elements of >>>> a vector through sub-register

Hello, I am new to LLVM and I am not sure whether I am writing to the right distribution list or not. Please let me know if this is not the right distribution list. Question: - I am having hard time lowering ADD instructions for different purposes. Basically, I want to have different machine instruction for pointer addition vs scalar addition. I am having hard time mapping LLVM add to my machine

No, there isn't something like that right now. What are you trying to accomplish? If you wish to implement this, it shouldn't be hard to do. Right now, MachineRegisterInfo re-starts virtual register number at TargetRegisterInfo::FirstVirtualRegister. You can add a mechanism to change that to a variable instead. Evan On Oct 20, 2008, at 1:43 PM, Villmow, Micah wrote: > Is

Is there currently a way to have virtual register allocation information be saved across functions so that if I create a new virtual register in a function that it doesn't use a virtual register allocated in any previous function? Thanks, Micah Villmow Systems Engineer Advanced Technology & Performance Advanced Micro Devices Inc. 4555 Great America Pkwy, Santa Clara, CA. 95054

Hi I have the following factor of dates that I want to converted to Date class so I can extract the month > test.date [1] 14/05/2012 14/05/2012 14/05/2012 14/05/2012 14/05/2012 14/05/2012 [7] 14/05/2012 14/05/2012 14/05/2012 14/05/2012 201 Levels: 01/10/2012 01/11/2012 01/12/2012 02/07/2012 ... 28/09/2012 I use code below ntest.date<-as.Date(test.date,'%d/%m/%y') but the output

I set response.body with some string, in controller''s index, but it seems did nothing.... Thanks. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this

Dear folks-- The function below is a snippet of a larger function that is not doing what it is supposed to do, and I do not understand its behavior. The larger function is supposed to produce an array containing the results of a user-specified function applied to groups of data defined by the intersection of one or more factors, and return them in an array with a dimension for each factor and a

Hi all, As I work toward improving LLVM register allocation, I've come across the need to do some refactoring. Specifically, I would like to separate register coalescing from live interval analysis. Right now LiveIntervals handles both. The reason I want to separate them is that other types of register allocators might like to do coalescing differently (e.g. graph coloring does it by

On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, David Greene wrote: >> Beyond that, one of the issues is the "r2rmap" and "rep" function. As >> you've noticed, the coallescer basically uses these to avoid rewriting the >> code after it does coallescing. For example, if r1024 is coallesced with >> r1026, it leaves all uses of both registers in the code, instead of >>

Dear R-helpers, I would appreicate if someone can help me on the transfer parameter in ARIMAX and also see what I am doing is correct. I am using ARIMAX with 2 Exogeneous Variables and 10 years data are as follows: DepVar Period, depVar, IndepVar1 Period, indepVar1, IndepVar2 Period, indepVar2 Jan 1998,708,Jan 1998,495,Jan 1998,245.490 Feb 1998,670,Feb 1998,421.25,Feb 1998,288.170 Mar

On Apr 12, 2007, at 2:37 PM, David Greene wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: >> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, David Greene wrote: >>> As I work toward improving LLVM register allocation, I've >>> come across the need to do some refactoring. Yay! >> Beyond that, one of the issues is the "r2rmap" and "rep" >> function. As >> you've

I have a dataset of 10000 records which I want to use to compare two prediction models. I split the records into test dataset (size = ntest) and training dataset (size = ntrain). Then I run the two models. Now I want to shuffle the data and rerun the models. I want many shuffles. I know that the following command sample ((1:10000), ntrain) can pick ntrain numbers from 1 to 10000. Then I just