similar to: Updating librvirt on the STD Distros

On Wednesday 24 April 2019 17:22:13 John R. Dennison wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:18:40AM -0400, mark wrote: > > Nope. Well... actually, my manager's talking about Ubuntu or maybe even > > FreeBSD. He's *extremely* upset with RH being so slow - 8 should have > > been out for some time, for one, and a lot of 7, even with SCL, is far > > behind, > > It

On 04/25/19 04:36, Gary Stainburn wrote: > On Wednesday 24 April 2019 17:22:13 John R. Dennison wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:18:40AM -0400, mark wrote: >>> Nope. Well... actually, my manager's talking about Ubuntu or maybe even >>> FreeBSD. He's *extremely* upset with RH being so slow - 8 should have >>> been out for some time, for one, and a lot

On 28.4.2011 07:13, Milan Ker?l?ger wrote: > There are missing updates (there could be more of them): > > libselinux-1.33.4-5.7.el5.src.rpm (RHBA-2011:0029, 1/12/11) > device-mapper-1.02.55-2.el5.src.rpm (RHBA-2011:0051, 1/13/11) Nothing is missing. Those are in CentOS 5.6 What version are you running ? > > > My error message: > > --> Running transaction check

I'll bite: Do you really believe you could ever get these folks to choose consistent llvm versions anyway? Or will you always have to do the work yourself anyway? In my talks with a number of these projects, they pretty much don't care what anyone else does, and plan to stick to their own import/etc schedules no matter what LLVM does with stable releases :) (For reference, Google

Like most people, I''ve got two machines: one for development and one for production. I''ve done everything I can to make sure the ruby/rails environments are the same, but of course they''re not identical (I''ll get into that in a moment). The error that I''m getting happens when I call a method in a background task controller on the production machine; I

Cristian Rodr?guez <crrodriguez at opensuse.org> wrote: > El 07/05/12 06:23, Miroslav Lichvar escribi?: > > On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 05:34:31PM -0400, Cristian Rodr?guez wrote: > >> This has the advantage of being more efficient than the included Btw, how much more efficient and on what hardware? Based on previous experience (in a project not related to FLAC) on x86_64

Hi, Can someone please send me info on what Xen versions are bundled in the Xen versions of the following distros? RHEL 5.4 RHEL 5.5 SLES 10 SP3 SLES 11 Thanks, -John _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

On 10/16/18 1:54 AM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: > Good afternoon from Singapore, > > What are the differences between systemd and non-systemd Linux distros? > > Is systemd implemented in all the latest Linux distros? > > Please advise. Thank you. > > My advice is to go and read up on the original design goals of systemd.? The information is out there.?

Am 09.02.2016 um 16:28 schrieb Jeff Sadowski: > Most major distros compile samba with out the ability to do AD DC (Ubutum, > Fedora, Suse) > Fedora's documentation since samba 4.0 has stated > "We'll provide Samba AD DC functionality as soon as its support of MIT > Kerberos KDC will be ready." > This is even provided in 4.4.0rc1 build of samba for fedora

Most major distros compile samba with out the ability to do AD DC (Ubutum, Fedora, Suse) I'm not against compiling or going with a non major distro like Zentyal but why do most major distros hold back from compiling samba with AD DC support? (speculation is mostly what I'm looking for) Fedora's documentation since samba 4.0 has stated "We'll provide Samba AD DC functionality

On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > Am 09.02.2016 um 16:28 schrieb Jeff Sadowski: > >> Most major distros compile samba with out the ability to do AD DC (Ubutum, >> Fedora, Suse) >> Fedora's documentation since samba 4.0 has stated >> "We'll provide Samba AD DC functionality as soon as its support

I''ve setup Xen using Fedora Core 5, as a simple command during install sets up the Xen Kernel. What I want to know is how do I install a distribution on a new account? Using a script that came with Fedora 5 I am able to setup a new guest and it starts to install Fedora 5 on it over the internet, but due to the size of it, it takes a long time. I would like to install a smaller more

Hi, I noted this message yesterday in R-devel. I think it would sensible to package a patched version while 2.12.2 is not delivered. ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: [Rd] Warning: you may need to use R-patched with recent R distros Date: Monday 31 January 2011, 19:48:33 From: Prof Brian Ripley <ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk> To: R-devel at r-project.org Two things have

On 10/16/18 7:51 AM, Leroy Tennison wrote: > Systemd is implemented in all the major distros, if you want to find ones that don't search for non-systemd. > Hoping to not offend proponents of systemd/firewalld... Linux kernel is already containing chunks of code related to systemd/firewalld and friends. One can disable stuff during kernel build, but the result it still is not like

Any recommendations for a Linux distro to put Shorewall on top of? My main concern is to be able to use a Windows NT PPTP VPN server behind the firewall. If I remember right, there were some issues with passing GRE traffic through some versions of the Linux kernel. Are they solved now or do I still have to do some cryptic kernel patches? Experiences with that? Thanks! Tim

being a complete novice with syslinux, I was hoping someone here could help me out. I have a USB Key that I have "broken" into two areas. General storage in the "back" and space for several live distributions on the front. What I need to do now is figure out how to make a syslinux.cfg file that would let me pick which one to boot at startup time. Basically, I want a menu

I am willing to help the community by creating .deb package files for Wine as soon as the source is released. I will links to the file here. I use Mediafire as my uploading host. Wine 1.4 Stable can be downloaded here http://www.mediafire.com/?7zi68cw59qzkawl (32bit) I'll compile a 64bit version only if people request it. ------------------------------------- Future releases will be listed

NetworkManager isn't provided on SLES. As yast2 lan is available on all openSUSE / SLE distro, use it instead. --- p2v/gui.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/p2v/gui.c b/p2v/gui.c index e720002..b50cadf 100644 --- a/p2v/gui.c +++ b/p2v/gui.c @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ #include <config.h> +#include <sys/stat.h> #include <stdio.h>

NetworkManager isn't provided on SLES. As yast2 lan is available on all openSUSE / SLE distro, use it instead. --- p2v/gui.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/p2v/gui.c b/p2v/gui.c index e720002..f8605a3 100644 --- a/p2v/gui.c +++ b/p2v/gui.c @@ -654,7 +654,10 @@ test_connection_ok (gpointer user_data) static void configure_network_button_clicked

Make sure that /bin/sh is available in the appliance, and that path is provided by dash on Debian distributions. --- appliance/packagelist.in | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/appliance/packagelist.in b/appliance/packagelist.in index 78aedad0b..f92a6ce95 100644 --- a/appliance/packagelist.in +++ b/appliance/packagelist.in @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ ifelse(DEBIAN,1, dnl old name used in