similar to: Ongoing VM saga ....

.... I have a 64-bit CentOS 5.6 VM running on a 64-bit FC14 host. Actually, I *HAD* a 64-bit CentOS 5.6 VM :-) .... After a read of the virt-install man page, I concluded that I could lose the current VM (but *NOT* its HDD image) & recreate it fairly easily w/ the right combo of arguments to virt-install. The proceedings: [root at Q6600:/etc, Mon Aug 15, 04:30 PM] 1163 # virsh list

.... I just installed CentOS 4.4 yesterday P.M., on my 2.4 GHz P4 box, Foxconn i865 mbd, 2 GB DDR400 RAM (4 X 512 MB), 1 X 20 GB HDD (hda), 1 X 160 GB HDD (hdb), 1 X LG GSA H22N DVD reader/burner (hdc), 1 X 400 GB HDD (hdd), Coolmax CP500-T PSU. I wiped SuSE 9.2 off of the 20 GB drive & installed CentOS. The other 2 drives were already ext3 FS & will be mounted as /home & /work

.... I have a 64-bit CentOS 5.6 VM running on a 64-bit FC14 host. I notice that it has an automatic logout feature after a period of idleness, see below: [wam at centos-5, CFD, 5:52:45pm] 1183 % ll -tr LIST LIST.Update /usr/local/bin/P* /usr/local/bin/*WAM* ; ps -u wam -lf ; uname -a ; date ls: No match. F S UID PID PPID C PRI NI P SZ:RSS WCHAN STIME TTY TIME CMD 5 S

On 08/11/16 02:33, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > When I perform a software RAID 1 or RAID 5 installation on a LAN server > with several hard disks, I wonder if GRUB already gets installed on each > individual MBR, or if I have to do that manually. On CentOS 5.x and 6.x, > this had to be done like this: > > # grub > grub> device (hd0) /dev/sda > grub> device

On 04/27/16 13:21, Pouar wrote: > On 04/27/16 08:49, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> On 04/26/16 21:13, John R Pierce wrote: >>> On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: >>>> Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, >>>> one of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well >>>> that's all news to me,

.... I have a CentOS 5.n VM running on a Fedora 14 server/host, installed using virt-manager, pretty plain vanilla. I use it to compile binaries to run under RHEL/CentOS 5.n OS. I occasionally notice that when the VM gets paged out by the server, it takes several minutes to get it back in :-/ (see below). On the host, logged in to a shell through a terminal window, this A.M.: [wam at Q6600,

On 04/26/16 21:13, John R Pierce wrote: > On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: >> >> Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, >> one of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well >> that's all news to me, and I cannot find anything online to >> corroborate the claim. Is this true, is it a bash vs. Bourne FUD, or

.... New to this list & definitely new to virtualization :-/ .... I am trying to setup a 64-bit CentOS 5.6 VM on a 64-bit FC14 server host, all patched up as of a couple of weeks ago. uname -a on the host shows: [wam at Q6600, CFD, 9:24:23am] 540 % uname -a Linux Q6600 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Feb 7 07:06:44 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [wam at Q6600, CFD, 9:52:43am]

We'll ignore that the group name for KDE changed, and so, since we had it on the same line as X, neither was installed. However, more of an annoyance: to get nfs working, I had to install: pam-krb5 ncsd then fix /etc/init.d/autofs (when I did a service restart, it told me automount was running, and did not stop it), then after some research, found I had to manually start rpcbind, *then*

Ben Love had this to say: > * Mike Leone wrote on [2010-03-27 22:02:38 -0400]: >> I tried to log on as "DACRIB+administrator" at the physical console. I >> was prompted twice for my password (dunno if that's because my password >> has a "!" in it or not). Then it starts to login. I see the motd. I see >> it say that it was trying to create a

.... I have a 64-bit CentOS 5.6 VM running on a 64-bit FC14 host. I have the stock networking (NAT), but I need routed to be able to access other boxen on my LAN. I looked at the docs on the libvirtd website, but their example of how to setup routed networking is for the GUI, which doesn't work for me (text in buttons, etc. doesn't display, no gfx card on host). The man pages are

.... When I query my qemu-mips under FC14 64-bit, libvirt.x86_64 0.8.3-10.fc14, qemu 2:0.13.0-1.fc14, I see the following: [root at Q6600:/etc, Wed Mar 21, 03:24 PM] 1022 # qemu-mips -cpu ? MIPS '4Kc' MIPS '4Km' MIPS '4KEcR1' MIPS '4KEmR1' MIPS '4KEc' MIPS '4KEm' MIPS '24Kc' MIPS '24Kf' MIPS '34Kf' [root at Q6600:/etc, Wed

On 05/13/16 23:08, Always Learning wrote: > On C6 (latest) I wanted to add an extra partition, number 14, to a 1TB > GPT disk. > > It failed repeatedly. The error message is:- > > ~~~~~~~ > > GParted 0.19.1 > > Libparted 2.1 > > Create Primary Partition #1 (ext4, 33.00 MiB) on /dev/sda 00:00:01 > ( ERROR ) > calibrate New Partition #1 00:00:00 (

.... I am getting a bit tired of those pesky DNSmasq entries in my syslog file, they fill it up about weekly, wash other stuff out of view on a tail. Is there any way to suppress them. or else increase their lease time so that they happen less frequently ? Having a finite lease time for a VM seems nonsensical, it can't go anywhere or disconnect (obviously) .... I tried restarting DNSmasq,

On 04/27/16 14:19, John R Pierce wrote: > >>>> >>last OS I can think of with an actual Bourne shell was Solaris. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> > >>> >The various *BSD's have & use the actual Bourne shell .... >>> > >>> > >> Which one? All the BSDs I know of use the Almquist Shell except for

.... I have a 64-bit CentOS 5.6 VM running on a 64-bit FC14 host, libvirt 0.8.3-10.fc14, 64-bit. I am getting messages in my syslog file, 2 about every 20 min. about dnsmasq: Aug 17 04:53:52 Q6600 dnsmasq-dhcp[1969]: DHCPREQUEST(virbr0) 192.168.122.213 52:54:00:a4:98:a3 Aug 17 04:53:52 Q6600 dnsmasq-dhcp[1969]: DHCPACK(virbr0) 192.168.122.213 52:54:00:a4:98:a3 Aug 17 05:20:13 Q6600

Hi, i don't know a lot about linux. But i wanted to play Ether Saga Online... Anyways, When i ran Launcher.exe Code: wine Launcher.exe

I saw this on the SuSE AMD64 list & decided to pass it along, since it seems like a sneaky problem. Later posts confirm it is *NOT* AMD64-specific, nor SuSE 9.3 specific .... -- William A. Mahaffey III --------------------------------------------------------------------- Remember, ignorance is bliss, but willful ignorance is LIBERALISM !!!! -------------- next part -------------- An

Hello everyone, I'm a big fan of Lost Saga but despite we can finally use the launcher and update the game, it'll still not start because of X-trap (like Rusty Hearts). I read that Wine's developers doesn't want to solve the problem because of privacies problems, but personally I don't care that much [Wink] If they want to take informations about my computer (and do we know

Shorewall 1.4.7c is now available and continues the saga with "<zone>_frwd" chains. My apologies for this mess.... -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net