similar to: How to setup routed networking in CLI ....

.... I have a 64-bit CentOS 5.6 VM running on a 64-bit FC14 host. I notice that it has an automatic logout feature after a period of idleness, see below: [wam at centos-5, CFD, 5:52:45pm] 1183 % ll -tr LIST LIST.Update /usr/local/bin/P* /usr/local/bin/*WAM* ; ps -u wam -lf ; uname -a ; date ls: No match. F S UID PID PPID C PRI NI P SZ:RSS WCHAN STIME TTY TIME CMD 5 S

.... I have a CentOS 5.n VM running on a Fedora 14 server/host, installed using virt-manager, pretty plain vanilla. I use it to compile binaries to run under RHEL/CentOS 5.n OS. I occasionally notice that when the VM gets paged out by the server, it takes several minutes to get it back in :-/ (see below). On the host, logged in to a shell through a terminal window, this A.M.: [wam at Q6600,

.... New to this list & definitely new to virtualization :-/ .... I am trying to setup a 64-bit CentOS 5.6 VM on a 64-bit FC14 server host, all patched up as of a couple of weeks ago. uname -a on the host shows: [wam at Q6600, CFD, 9:24:23am] 540 % uname -a Linux Q6600 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Feb 7 07:06:44 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [wam at Q6600, CFD, 9:52:43am]

.... When I query my qemu-mips under FC14 64-bit, libvirt.x86_64 0.8.3-10.fc14, qemu 2:0.13.0-1.fc14, I see the following: [root at Q6600:/etc, Wed Mar 21, 03:24 PM] 1022 # qemu-mips -cpu ? MIPS '4Kc' MIPS '4Km' MIPS '4KEcR1' MIPS '4KEmR1' MIPS '4KEc' MIPS '4KEm' MIPS '24Kc' MIPS '24Kf' MIPS '34Kf' [root at Q6600:/etc, Wed

.... I am getting a bit tired of those pesky DNSmasq entries in my syslog file, they fill it up about weekly, wash other stuff out of view on a tail. Is there any way to suppress them. or else increase their lease time so that they happen less frequently ? Having a finite lease time for a VM seems nonsensical, it can't go anywhere or disconnect (obviously) .... I tried restarting DNSmasq,

On 08/11/16 02:33, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > When I perform a software RAID 1 or RAID 5 installation on a LAN server > with several hard disks, I wonder if GRUB already gets installed on each > individual MBR, or if I have to do that manually. On CentOS 5.x and 6.x, > this had to be done like this: > > # grub > grub> device (hd0) /dev/sda > grub> device

.... I have a 64-bit CentOS 5.6 VM running on a 64-bit FC14 host. Actually, I *HAD* a 64-bit CentOS 5.6 VM :-) .... After a read of the virt-install man page, I concluded that I could lose the current VM (but *NOT* its HDD image) & recreate it fairly easily w/ the right combo of arguments to virt-install. The proceedings: [root at Q6600:/etc, Mon Aug 15, 04:30 PM] 1163 # virsh list

.... I just installed CentOS 4.4 yesterday P.M., on my 2.4 GHz P4 box, Foxconn i865 mbd, 2 GB DDR400 RAM (4 X 512 MB), 1 X 20 GB HDD (hda), 1 X 160 GB HDD (hdb), 1 X LG GSA H22N DVD reader/burner (hdc), 1 X 400 GB HDD (hdd), Coolmax CP500-T PSU. I wiped SuSE 9.2 off of the 20 GB drive & installed CentOS. The other 2 drives were already ext3 FS & will be mounted as /home & /work

On 04/26/16 21:13, John R Pierce wrote: > On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: >> >> Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, >> one of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well >> that's all news to me, and I cannot find anything online to >> corroborate the claim. Is this true, is it a bash vs. Bourne FUD, or

On 04/27/16 13:21, Pouar wrote: > On 04/27/16 08:49, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> On 04/26/16 21:13, John R Pierce wrote: >>> On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: >>>> Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, >>>> one of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well >>>> that's all news to me,

.... I have a 64-bit CentOS 5.6 VM running on a 64-bit FC14 host, libvirt 0.8.3-10.fc14, 64-bit. I am getting messages in my syslog file, 2 about every 20 min. about dnsmasq: Aug 17 04:53:52 Q6600 dnsmasq-dhcp[1969]: DHCPREQUEST(virbr0) 192.168.122.213 52:54:00:a4:98:a3 Aug 17 04:53:52 Q6600 dnsmasq-dhcp[1969]: DHCPACK(virbr0) 192.168.122.213 52:54:00:a4:98:a3 Aug 17 05:20:13 Q6600

.... I have a 64-bit CentOS 5.6 VM running on a 64-bit FC-14 host. I was originally using the stock NAT networking on the guest, which could access the host, but nothing else on the network. I eventually found some links on how to setup routed networking on the guest using a specifically setup bridge. I followed the example a bit too closely, bridging my eth0 interface, which is the one I

On 05/13/16 23:08, Always Learning wrote: > On C6 (latest) I wanted to add an extra partition, number 14, to a 1TB > GPT disk. > > It failed repeatedly. The error message is:- > > ~~~~~~~ > > GParted 0.19.1 > > Libparted 2.1 > > Create Primary Partition #1 (ext4, 33.00 MiB) on /dev/sda 00:00:01 > ( ERROR ) > calibrate New Partition #1 00:00:00 (

On 04/27/16 14:19, John R Pierce wrote: > >>>> >>last OS I can think of with an actual Bourne shell was Solaris. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> > >>> >The various *BSD's have & use the actual Bourne shell .... >>> > >>> > >> Which one? All the BSDs I know of use the Almquist Shell except for

Hi, When I perform a software RAID 1 or RAID 5 installation on a LAN server with several hard disks, I wonder if GRUB already gets installed on each individual MBR, or if I have to do that manually. On CentOS 5.x and 6.x, this had to be done like this: # grub grub> device (hd0) /dev/sda grub> device (hd1) /dev/sdb grub> root (hd0,0) grub> setup (hd0) grub> root (hd1,0) grub>

I saw this on the SuSE AMD64 list & decided to pass it along, since it seems like a sneaky problem. Later posts confirm it is *NOT* AMD64-specific, nor SuSE 9.3 specific .... -- William A. Mahaffey III --------------------------------------------------------------------- Remember, ignorance is bliss, but willful ignorance is LIBERALISM !!!! -------------- next part -------------- An

On C6 (latest) I wanted to add an extra partition, number 14, to a 1TB GPT disk. It failed repeatedly. The error message is:- ~~~~~~~ GParted 0.19.1 Libparted 2.1 Create Primary Partition #1 (ext4, 33.00 MiB) on /dev/sda 00:00:01 ( ERROR ) calibrate New Partition #1 00:00:00 ( SUCCESS ) path: /dev/sda-1 start: 613591359 end: 1953525134 size: 1339933776 (638.93 GiB) create empty

.... I am using Samba 2.2.2 (from SGI freeware) under IRIX 6.5.20 very successfully until a few weeks ago. I use it to backup my Gtw 1600 MHz box using smbclient under cron for automated backups. I attach a small file of error messages I am getting now. This worked (for months) when I first set it up about 15-18 months ago. Unfortunately at some indetermniate time in the recent past (a few

I've got an odd problem. My server will not shutdown normally because the AoE driver is not being shut down properly. While investigating the problem, I found that the aoe script is apparently not being called for shutdown. I have been able to duplicate this with a brand new test script. My test script is just a simple file that echos back the start or stop command: #!/bin/bash #

Kenneth Porter wrote: > I saw mention of dnf in a blog article about installing a package on > CentOS. Further investigation revealed that Fedora is replacing yum with > dnf, apparently a new and better yum. But it wasn't clear if dnf was a For the normal user (like me) dnf is neither better nor worse than yum. In fact it is almost identical. In my view, the introduction of a new