similar to: libvirt/kvm/qemu: pointopoint routed setup?

Hi, I''m using the XEN 3.4.1-pre4 Hypervisor in Routet Mode and I''m facing some problems when I start the DomU. In detail, it means that the DomU IP-Adress will not be implemented in the Kernel routing table after starting the domU via "xm create /<path +configfle>" After making a "netstat -nr" it will not show the IPadress bound to the

Hi, > Can you manually do on the xen interfaces what the scripts would? How about > doing it on some other interface configured in a similar way? Toying with the vif-route script, I might have found a workaround for this issue. If I disable the ifconfig and ip route commands from vif-route script, and bring up vif interface by hand later on, everything seems to work. In other works,

Hi, I seem to have an interesting issue with vif-route. This is after an update to Xen 4.2.1, switching from xm to xl. I have 10 PV domUs on the host and two FreeBSD ones. All the PV domUs are now working nicely. Since FreeBSD has always been just slightly broken as PV I chose a HVM domU for those, but with PV drivers. Those PV drivers all blew up now after the upgrade. I''m now trying

Hello, Fast question: from DomU I cannot ping Dom0, I only get 19:17:33.573370 arp who-has 192.168.10.1 tell 192.168.10.150 19:17:34.573421 arp who-has 192.168.10.1 tell 192.168.10.150 using tcpdump in Dom0. Why? --------------- Detailed question: I''m setting up a Xen virtual server. The environment is: -HVM -AMD64 -Debian Etch and using Xen from Debian repository (so Xen 3.0.3,

Hello Andreas, On 10/11/05, Andreas Jellinghaus <aj at dungeon.inka.de> wrote: > Peter Koch pointed me to your posting on openssh-devel mailing list. I am very glad that he did. > I'm one of the opensc people, and from my point of view your idea > is a good one. The current openssh-opensc code has a number of issues, > for example the ssh-agent does not test the pin

A site I administer has dual T1''s. We have this set up according to NANO-HOWTO[1] using Julian''s routes patch on a late model 2.4 kernel. All is well, has been working well for a long time. Recently one of our T1 providers went belly up and we got something better. Now we have a /28 where previously we only used one IP per interface. Present interfaces: eth0 - T1#1, single

Hi, I''d be very interested to hear: does anyone have a stable working amd64 machine (in 64bit mode)? if so, which kernel do you use, and which version of xen / hg tree do you use? linux-2.6-xen.hg compiles fine over here, but reboots during boot. so fast I can''t see anything. (sorry, my laptop has no serial port. so I can''t capture a log file.) 2.6.16-rc4-git8 plus

In kernel 2.6.31, the handling of the rp_filter interface option was changed incompatibly. Previously, the effective value was determined by the setting of net.ipv4.config.dev.proxy_arp logically ANDed with the setting of net.ipv4.config.all.proxy_arp. Beginning with kernel 2.6.31, the value is the arithmetic MAX of those two values. Additionally, a ''loose'' routefiltering

Extracting from data frame one element at a time the way you did is expensive. I.e., test[i, 6] is slower than test$whatever[i]. As an example: > dat <- data.frame(a = sample(LETTERS, 1e6, replace=TRUE), b=1:1e6, + c=rep("A", 1e6)) > dat$a <- as.character(dat$a) > dat$c <- as.character(dat$c) > > system.time( + for(i in 1:10) { + dat[i, 3]

Package: xen-utils-3.2-1 Version: 3.2.0-5 Severity: important $vifnum is undefined when this is called. Starting XEN control daemon: xend/etc/xen/scripts/network-route: line 27: /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth/proxy_arp: No such file or directory /etc/xen/scripts/network-route: line 27: /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth/proxy_arp: No such file or directory /etc/xen/scripts/network-route: line 27:

Hello everyone, I''m using shorewall successfully on many servers withount any problems and I''m really happy with this great piece of software. But now I ran into a problem with shorewall 3.0.4 on Ubuntu 6.06 running on a vServer. The provider uses virtual interfaces like eth0:vs01 for the customers. The interface eth0 cannot be touched. I''ve read the instructions

Hi I need to use a Windows domain without a bridge. How should I set this up? I am using xen routed setup with pointopoint for my linux domUs. Regards, Steffen _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi, I need a help on Linux routing, if you have some sparse time. I''m based in Madagascar and my English is not good; so please forgive me. *What I want to come-up with: *My main goal is to download using two modems at the same time, and combining their bandwidth, but I have failed miserably. The reason is this: our country is still using poor slow internets, and I have seen on the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.0/shorewall-2.0.10 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.0/shorewall-2.0.10 Nothing Earth-shattering here and there is no reason to upgrade if you are not seeing one of the corrected problems. - ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Problems corrected in version 2.0.10 1) The

Hello folks, I used to work with bridging for my xen networks, but my very last hosting provider doesn''t support multiple mac address on the switch port. So I''m trying to configure some virtual servers on xen 3.2.1 using the network-route and vif-route method instead of bridge. Everything works well, on the virtual server except the network. In the VM definition file, I have :

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:43 PM Vasiliy Tolstov <v.tolstov@selfip.ru> wrote: Hi Vasiliy, > > ср, 10 апр. 2019 г. в 19:46, Ruben Kerkhof <ruben@rubenkerkhof.com>: > > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 1:44 PM Laine Stump <laine@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > On 4/9/19 11:35 AM, Ruben Kerkhof wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 5:10 PM

shorewall-users hi,ALL I have a firewall have three interface, one NIC is internal (eth0), second NIC is SSN(eth2), and other NIC is external(eth1), on internal network have 10.0.1.59 and gw 10.0.1.163 eth0: 192.168.1.254/24 eth1: 10.0.1.55/24 gw 10.0.1.163 I use shorewall''s proxyarp 10.0.1.59 eth1 eth0 no no that is OK. I saw /usr/share/shorewall/firewall, I

Hi, i've got this problem with my jail and i'm abolutly lost as in the why of it. I previously posted this on comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc but i was advised to send here I was unable to find help on google :( To resume quick, when i'm in a jail, netstat doesn't work properly. Hopefully i have provided sufficient information for anyone willing to help me :p First of all, my system :

Hello alltogether, I''m new to the list, so please excuse any violations of listiquette... I didn''t have to much to do with linux based firewalling and routing for quite a time and found that proxy-arp changed in between... As I struggled with it I found that the Advanced routing... howto wasn''t to helpfull. Especially the documentation seems to be rather vice versa to

Hi, I posted this question yesterday on the Openvpn mailing list, with no response, figured I will ask here too. I have been using openvpn for quite a while, no major problems encountered. Now I need to allow the server to access the lan of the client, and I can not figure out the routing. This is what I have after the tunnel is brought up: SERVER (A.A.A.A) Arx:~# ip addr ... 3: eth1: