similar to: performance with libvirt and kvm

Is anyone using libvirt for lxc ? I am trying to do so and running into an issue. The system container starts fine with lxc tools and am able to connect to it. Here is the snippet of my xml file (rest is same as in http://libvirt.org/drvlxc.html) <devices> <emulator>/usr/libexec/libvirt_lxc</emulator> <filesystem type='mount'> <source

Hi, Has anyone used libvirt to start/stop/manage LXC (linux containers) ? Is it supported at all? Last I tried, had few issues and the reply was : /// Note that libvirt lxc driver is a different implementation from lxc tools and doesn't use lxc tools internally. You may not be able to do what you are doing with lxc tools. Especially, the driver doesn't take aware of files and settings

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171 Summary: Banner /etc/issue.net (default) not displaying with Protocol 2 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.1p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo:

I''ve just pushed vdiskadm import/export/convert to the 3.3 vdisk and vbox repos. You can now import a disk image from a block device or file to a vdisk, convert (in place) to a different type of vdisk and export from a vdisk to a block device or file. I''ve also pushed the full vhd support (sparse and fixed) and the ability to import a vmdk 1.1 optimized stream file. An

Here is the error I get, Unable to complete install ''exceptions.RuntimeError Error creating vdisk /var/lib/xen/images/centos.img Traceback (most recent call last): File "/var/tmp/pkgbuild-gbuild/SUNWvirt-manager-0.6.1-build/virtManager/create.py", line 730, in do_install File "/export/builds/xvm_127///proto/install/usr/lib Please could you help? I would like to

Looks like I forgot to send this to the alias... MRJ ---- A quick heads up for the iscsi, zvol, and vdisk format putback I did into the 3.3 development gate. ISCSI ===== With this putback, you can now install onto and boot a guest using iSCSI disk(s). The iscsi formats supported are: phy:iscsi:/alias/<iscsi-alias> phy:iscsi:/static/<server IP>/<lun>/<target

Dear all, I have a zoo object that has following structure: > str(bldata) zoo [1:5219, 1:12] 91.9 91.8 91.7 91.8 91.7 ... - attr(*, "index")=Classes 'dates', 'times' atomic [1:5219] 7305 7306 7307 7308 7309 ... .. ..- attr(*, "format")= chr "m/d/y" .. ..- attr(*, "origin")= Named num [1:3] 1 1 1970 .. .. ..- attr(*,

Hi, I am testing tinc for a very large scale deployment. I am using tinc-1.1 for testing. test results below are for tinc in switch mode. all other settings are default. test is performed in LAN env. 2 different hosts. I am getting only 24.6 Mbits/sec when tinc is used. without tinc on the same hosts/link I get 95 to 100 Mbits/sec using iperf. Over Tinc: iperf -c 192.168.9.9 -b 100m -l 32k -w

[PATCH 4/4] Add libvdisk, and vdisk_tool vdisk-support.patch provides libvdisk, and vdisk_tool, as described in [PATCH 0/4] Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <bostrovsky@virtualiron.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Guthro <bguthro@virtualiron.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

I have two boxes for the purpose of testing traffic control and my knowledge thereof (which is at the inkling stage). The boxes are connected by 100Mbit ethernet cards via a switch. For egress traffic via eth0 I achieve a throughput that is close to the specified CEILing, particularly for values above 1mbit. Ingress traffic does not seem so well behaved. Above about 1mbit rates achieved are

Hi, below are some test results from implementing a prio qdisc ''that is also below''. The qdisc is attacted to a vlan interface for my external network. Both tests were run at the same time. The links are policed at 6.0M ''by our provider''. 192.168.70.1 --> 192.168.30.1 My question is: If using a prio qdisc should''nt the iperf run with a tos of b8 have

Gents, We want to understand the mechanism of zfs a bit better. Q: what is the design/algorithm of zfs in terms of reclaiming unused blocks? Q: what criteria is there for zfs to start reclaiming blocks Issue at hand is an LDOM or zone running in a virtual (thin-provisioned) disk on a NFS server and a zpool inside that vdisk. This vdisk tends to grow in size even if the user writes and deletes

I have a Dell server with four bonded, gigabit interfaces. Bonding mode is 802.3ad, xmit_hash_policy=layer3+4. When testing this setup with iperf, I never get more than a total of about 3Gbps throughput. Is there anything to tweak to get better throughput? Or am I running into other limits (e.g. was reading about tcp retransmit limits for mode 0). The iperf test was run with iperf -s on the

connection will remain a TCP connection unless it is broken and restarted. Usually if I stop the client and wait for about 30 seconds to reconnect, there is a much greater chance that the MTU probes work fine, and in about 30 seconds MTU is fixed to 1416. Every time when the MTU probing fails, I see latency between 700 - 1000 ms with 32 byte pings over a LAN. Every time when the MTU probing does

Good afternoon, I was wondering if anyone has any in site as to how to import a VMware vmdk into xVM on OpenSolaris 2009.06 (xVM 3.1). I have a VMware VM created on VMware Server 2.0 and would like to move it over to this xVM server. I appreciate any advice anyone may have. Cheers, -Chris -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

I have an R function (about 1000 lines long) that takes more than 20 times as long to run under R Windows 1.9.0 and 1.8.1 than it does under 1.7.1. Profile results indicate that the $<-.data.frame operation is the culprit, but I don't understand exactly what that is (assignment of data frame elements to another variable?), or why it's only a problem under 1.8.1 and 1.9.0. Any advice?

I'm only doing one frame using speex_encode_int greatly simplifies my code I'm not sure why the sample I was working off of was converting the shorts to floats then calling the other encode/decode methods. Based off of your suggestions I tried the following but I get the same result. virtual Enigma::u8* Encode(Enigma::u8* inputBuffer,size_t inputSize, size_t& outputSize) {

Hi, I am using the speex 1.0.4 library from Windows. I have posted my problem before but didn't get a solution. I am doing an VOIP project in which i am recording sound and streaming it to the peer. I wanted to encode and decode wav files that brought me to this site. I am recording sound in the following format:- m_WaveFormatEx.wFormatTag = WAVE_FORMAT_PCM;

I''ve just pushed vdiskadm translate to the 3.3 vdisk repo. You can now translate data from one virtual disk data type to another without creating a virtual disk. This allows the user to use a vmdk file and directly translate the data into a zvol without having to import it first to a vdisk and then export it to the zvol. # vdiskadm help translate translate - translate virtual disk data

I created a xen domU and using the Virtual Machine Manager. This created a large file on a zfs filesystem (in /var/lib/xen/images) containing the virtual disk image. Is there a better way to create a virtual disk? Does zpool/zfs allow to create special devices/filesystems with better I/O performance than a file over a zfs space? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org