similar to: Functionality of virsh net-edit

Upgraded from Debian Dovecot 1.0.15 to Debian Dovecot 1.2.10-1~bpo50+1. I use Postfix local delivery to and Dovecot mbox. As per upgrade directions, I stopped dovecot processes and deleted all dovecot.index.cache files in /home/%user/mail/.imap. Performed upgrade to 1.2.10-1~bpo50+1. Modified new dovecot.conf for my environment. Started dovecot. Problem: Instantly noticed in TB 3.0.1 Win32

This is really unfortunate. I've read the discussion threads for the atom/chunk controversy and I feel like I understand the reasons for rewriting the linker, but this does not seem to have anything to do with whether the linker is usable as a library or not. As it stands, not only does lld have two completely different linkers (I'm treating COFF/ELF2 as one since they are really two

I think I have an idea to cover your need and possibly other people's on this thread. It provides the "main() as a library function" feature, input/output files wouldn't go through disks nor file systems, and it doesn't require any major design changes. Sounds too good? That is, we can provide a function that takes command line parameters, do fork, and call the linker's

Hello! I have question about Debian package management with puppet. I''m wondering is there sane way to make puppet respects packages pinning? i.e., if I have several repos for one package, let''s say it is "nginx" which can be found in lenny & lenny-backports repos. I''ve created pinning file like: Package: nginx Pin: release a=lenny-backports Pin-Priority:

> If I were a user, I definitely want the former instead of the latter because the former just provides more. This is if you wanted to use the library (e.g. embed linker into clang, do parallel linking of many executables from the same process, etc.). For some use cases there's no difference because the only thing you'll do with a library is link it into a command-line executable and

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rafael Espíndola via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Yaron Keren" <yaron.keren at gmail.com> > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "Arseny Kapoulkine" <arseny.kapoulkine at gmail.com> > Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 9:39:34 AM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] lld:

Hello speex development team! As I see on http://www.speex.org/downloads/ page, where is no Windows binaries for speex encoder and decoder tools for 1.2beta2 version since no maintainer for it yet. Well, I compiled it from the sources using MSYS environment and MinGW tools (GCC version is 3.4.5). Both libOgg-1.1.3 and speex-1.2beta2 were configured as "./configure

If you want to link ELF object files, you are likely to be using a Unix machine. I'm not trying to address all possible problems but suggesting a practical solution. On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Yaron Keren <yaron.keren at gmail.com> wrote: > On Windows fork() is not available. If exec() is used instead, process > creation time is several times slower than Linux. This may be

In the process of migrating from old lld ELF linker to new (previously ELF2) I noticed the interface lost several important features (ordered by importance for my use case): 1. Detecting errors in the first place. New linker seems to call exit(1) for any error. 2. Reporting messages to non-stderr outputs. Previously all link functions had a raw_ostream argument so it was possible to delay the

Hello. I plan to use OCFS2 + DRBD for email server. Problem: I use "seeker" for testing http://www.linuxinsight.com/how_fast_is_your_disk.html And get this: Results: 65 seeks/second, 15.23 ms random access time Then I do rm of many files - it fals to 10 seeks/second and performance is terrible. What can I do to increase it? What`s wrong? Below is many info. What we have: Debian

System: Debian 5.0.4 Lenny Kernel: custom 2.6.31.1 built from kernel.org source Dovecot: 1.0.15-2.3+lenny1 Available: 1.2.9-1~bpo50+1 Mailbox format: mbox Storage location: /home/$user/mail/ on ext2 fs Delivery: Postfix 2.5.5 local to /var/mail/$user As you can see Debian has a backport package of Dovecot 1.2.9 available to Lenny users, and it appears it is a big jump forward in terms of

Hi List, i'm running the current debian lenny dovecot-version (dpkg says it's 1.0.15-2.3+lenny1) and i'm trying to get the antispam-plugin ('1.2+20090702-1~bpo50+3') to work. Unfortunately dovecot always says "antispam plugin not configured" moving spam into the spam-folder. My config: protocol imap { mail_plugins = antispam } plugin { antispam_signature =

Greetings all, I'll skip the details of the setup, except to say that it has a non-standard (and non-templateable) home directory path for virtual users. Ran into the following problem when a debian (possibly from backports) packaged dovecot-1.1.2 was upgraded to a dovecot-1.1.13-2~bpo50+1 (definately from backports): sieve-storage: root directory specified by mail data does not exist:

If you want to run Dovecot on Debian Lenny for a Production System (with Fast Upgrade System for Security Patches), What would you recommend? Stick to the current port with Dovecot Version 1.0.15 (1:1.0.15-2.3) Use Backports Version 1.1.13 (1:1.1.13-2~bpo50+1) or Use any of the packages from:

Hello. What we have: 2x Debian 5.0 x64 - 2.6.32-20~bpo50+1 from backports DRBD + OCFS2 1.4.1-1 I have both node reboot every day on my tests. On heavy load it have to 1-3 hour to reboot, on idle about 20 hours. I not sure what it is a OCFS2 related but if I not mount OCFS2 partition - I don`t get this reboot. In attach screenshoot with system console on what error. Nothing special in logs.

Hi Rui I agree separating the components out in to libraries only makes sense when there is a clear reason to do so. However, just this year there was a very involved discussion about what it means to be a library. Specifically, I don't think your current 'main-as-library' argument is valid while you call exit or (if you) rely on mutable global state. Having a single entry point

On 7/27/07, Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves <justivo@gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/24/07, Arseny Krasutsky <dtiger@mail.ru> wrote: > > So I can send this binaries to you if you want to place it online. > > I'm sure people need it :-) > > I do not know Jean-Marc's position on this -- it's his project, so I > don't want to meddle -- but if he does not oppose, I

As a person who started this thread I should probably comment on the interface. My needs only require a library-like version of a command-line interface. Just to be specific, the interface that would work okay is the old high-level lld interface: bool link(ArrayRef<const char*> args, raw_ostream& diagnostics) This would require round-tripping data through files which is not ideal but

Hi, I would be extremely grateful if you could cast your eye over my problem with getting Windows 7 PC back onto on a Samba domain? I have the current version from lenny-backports: 2:3.4.8~dfsg-2~bpo50+1, the client is windows 7 Ultimate. logins and profiles and nelogon scripts all seemed to work back in Feb 2010 using the instructions here: http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7 However

Hello, after having no problem with four Windows 2000 workstations and one Samba 2.something server for several years in a medical practice the practice software (DocComfort) dropped support for Windows 2000 beginning of this year. So I bought new hardware for the workstations and servers and installed from scratch. Now there are four Windows 7 Professional 32bit Workstations (with UAC disabled)