similar to: FailOver IP

On Wed, December 23, 2015 8:06 am, Meikel wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have a server at Soyoustart.com (which is a brand of OVH). I run > CentOS 6.7 and have problems with network configuration. > > I want to add a second public ip (failover ip) to the server and did > follow the instructions in the CentOS-section of > http://hilfe.ovh.de/AdministrationIpAliasHinzufuegen >

Hi folks, I have a server at Soyoustart.com (which is a brand of OVH). I run CentOS 6.7 and have problems with network configuration. I want to add a second public ip (failover ip) to the server and did follow the instructions in the CentOS-section of http://hilfe.ovh.de/AdministrationIpAliasHinzufuegen After executing the required steps I'm not able to reach the host via the second ip

[i''m not clearly a network guru, but i''ve some knowledge... anyway i think i''ve arrived to my ``end point'''' here. Probably i''ve also done some big mistake, so please sorry me.] I''ve setup in a local branch of my office two servers, say radagast (10.27.1.2) and olorin (10.27.1.3). They share the same UPS and the same place, sitting at

On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:03:51 +0000 Stephen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello I wonder if anyone here could possibly help me? I am using > Samba version 4.5.16-Debian (version information taken from sudo > smbstatus) on Raspbian and attempting to prototype some future > network infrastructure with a couple of Raspberry Pis. > > So far I have sucessfully

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:26:18PM +0200, Sven-Haegar Koch wrote: > > #!/bin/sh > > ifconfig $INTERFACE 10.96.x.y > > Won't a netmask of 255.255.255.255 be better than not specifying any? > Otherwise it falls back to old classful adressing and would assume > 10.0.0.0/8 - which is clearly always wrong. [...] Or are tun devices > different in this regard? Hm, it

Comments below On Fri, 24 Apr 2015, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:09:05PM +0200, Raimund Sacherer wrote: > > > At first I really like the idea of having 3 Daemons on the headquarter, one for each ISP. The firewall should forward the port 655 from each ISP's public IP Address to my internal server and to the ports 655, 656, 657 respectively > [...] > >

El 12 de febrero de 2016 16:51:59 CET, Eric Yau <ericyaukhy at hotmail.com> escribi?: >Hi All, > > > >I am trying to setup the site-to-site VPN with TINC for connect my home >network to company network. Here is the IP allocation and configuration >for >your reference. > > > >Home PC (192.168.1.2) ?-----? Home (OPENWRT Router, 192.168.1.1, >10.0.0.1)

Hello folks, I used to work with bridging for my xen networks, but my very last hosting provider doesn''t support multiple mac address on the switch port. So I''m trying to configure some virtual servers on xen 3.2.1 using the network-route and vif-route method instead of bridge. Everything works well, on the virtual server except the network. In the VM definition file, I have :

here''s the setup (two dsl - same provider) +-----> link1 LAN----- linux box --| |----------internet +-----> link2 the setup is ok in terms of the failover requirement. the other link takes over when one is down. however, there is a very noticeable lag when both lines are up. i''ve tried changing

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=844 Summary: Can set apparently invalid netmask for hash:ip Product: ipset Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: default AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

Hello All, I took a break from trying to get Tinc working and have come back to it now with the release of 1.0.11. I have 2 Windows computers connected behind firewalls and everything seems to be correct, except I cannot seem to get any data past the server TAP interface. I can ping the Server TAP interface from the client, but no data will move through the TAP interface to the Internet. I have

Hi, I have a failover configuration. The domain controller's IP: 10.23.14.150 as dc01 The failover IP is: 10.23.14.155 as dcha I added an A and a CNAME record to the dns for the failover IP. It is working, i can see the shares, but I could not enter to any share as user, as Administrator it works. I tried to add the interface variable (i am not sure this is available in samba4), that

Hello /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 looks like this: # Intel Corporation 82545EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) TYPE=Ethernet NAME=eth0 NM_CONTROLLED=no IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes UUID=cc2635ff-3c14-48ba-b19a-84c5b9d36a9d ONBOOT=yes DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=none HWADDR=00:50:56:01:00:01 BROADCAST=192.168.0.255 IPADDR=192.168.0.10 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETWORK=192.168.0.0

I'm currently hacking on CTDB's IP takeover/failover code. For Samba 4.6, I would like to rationalise the IP takeover-related tunable parameters. I would like to know if there are any users who set the values of these tunables to non-default values. The tunables in question are: DisableIPFailover Default: 0 When set to non-zero, ctdb will not perform failover or

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=841 Summary: Specifying netmask option when creating ipv6 hash:ip is inconsistent Product: ipset Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: default AssignedTo:

I need to get this working. I have a single interface eth0 with a primary adress of x.x.214.162 on a /30 block network. This interface is properly set up and works fine, however, I also have five aliased adresses on the same interface: eth0:1 @ x.x.6.230, eth0:2 @ x.x.6.235, eth0:3 @ x.x.6.240, eth0:4 @ x.x.6.245, and eth0:5 @ x.x.6.250. All of these adresses are on a /27 block network. After

Hello, I'm trying to set up IP aliases within a QEMU/KVM guest on CentOS 5.5 x86_64, going through a bridged virtualized interface. The virtualized interface in the guest is configured as follow: # ifcfg-eth1 DEVICE=eth1 BOOTPROTO=none PEERDNS=yes GATEWAY=IP.OF.HOST.GATEWAY HWADDR=11:11:11:11:11:11 IPADDR=IP.OF.GUEST.ETH1 NETMASK=255.255.255.255 ONBOOT=yes ARP=yes USERCTL=no IPV6INIT=no #

hi, we have successfully implemented at tang/clevis environment for automatically entering luks keys and booting hosts without operator intervention. Now we would like to use this as well on ipv6 networks, but I do not seem to get it to work. I have already posted this issue to the dracut devs github issue tracker ( https://github.com/dracutdevs/dracut/issues/554) but no response so far. Maybe

Hi all, After having read most of the available documentation I still have got problems interconnecting two networks in router mode: My configuration consists of two private home networks that I want to connect: Vienna 192.168.0.0/24 - Internet gateway 192.168.0.1 Berlin 192.168.1.0/24 - Internet gateway 192.168.1.1 VPN Devices are configured as 192.168.3.1 (Vienna) and 192.168.3.2

If understand the setup correctly based on previous emails, it looks like this: [Internet] <-> [202.172.122.211 (eth1) {Gateway Machine} 202.172.122.74 (eth2)] <-> [202.172.122.75 (eth1) {Other Machine}] So, according to your emails, your external (eth1) interface on the Gateway machine ** needs to be .209 not .211 or .210 ** (as this is where the ISP''s