similar to: virsh domxml-from-native not working

Dear list, I have moved my HVMs from xen to kvm and it worked well except some problems using virsh. First, one OpenSolaris HVM does boot with warnings: WARNING: /pci at 0,0/pci1af4,1100 at 1,2 (uhci1): No SOF interrupts have been received, this USB UHCI host controller is unusable* *The corresponding process: /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -S -M pc-0.12 -enable-kvm -m 1024 -smp

It appears that Horde requires the "domxml" PHP extension, which is apparently not a part of the standard CentOS 4.x PHP 4.x distribution. In fact, "domxml" is no longer available from the sourceforge web site as they prefer the use of the dom libraries in PHP5 instead. http://pecl.php.net/package/domxml Given these facts, how has anyone gotten this working? I would love to

Hey Virtualeers, When using domxml to configure a Xen domain, where is the meta spec for boot order? Before domxml, using xen-xm, this was easy: boot = 'dca' ; 1-CD | 2-HD | 3-floppy When I try adding this below with Virsh (vi), it is erased in Xen domains <boot dev='hd'> In KVM domains it is accepted. -- Mark

Hi. When i try to launch VM with command virsh start vm1.It gives following error -device ide-hd,bus=ide.0,unit=0,drive=drive-ide0-0-0,id=ide0-0-0,bootindex=1: Bus 'ide.0' not found When I create the same qemu command from xml again. It show following addition parameter added by virsh in output qemu command 1) -device ide-hd,bus=ide.0,unit=0,drive=drive-ide0-0-0,id=ide0-0-0,bootindex=1

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 04:23:05PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > Moving to libvirt-users where it belongs. > > On Thu, 2019-04-18 at 06:47 +0000, Tal Attaly wrote: > > Hi, > > I have bridge type interface defined with slot 3 - > > <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x03' function='0x0'/> > > but

Dear Tinc Experts, I have been struggling for some time now, with Tinc pre3, and firewall rulesets and routing. I did once manage to get Tinc to work okay in a test-bed environment. I then tried to set it up for a 'real-life' setup and cannot get it to work properly. My real-life setup looks like this: Network A: 192.168.1.0 / 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.7 tap1 device gateway >

On Thu, 2019-04-18 at 15:29 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 04:23:05PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > qemuDomainAssignAddresses() is supposed to make sure that any address > > configured explicitly by the user (or previously by libvirt) is > > preserved, and it's doing that correctly when it's called from inside > >

Hi Tinc Mailing-Group, Having set up the kernel correctly, and got tinc running successfully, I am now trying to get two VPNs running at once. Hence I need to have two ethertap devices ( /dev/tap0 and /dev/tap1 ). The first tap0 device was created thus: mknod -m 600 /dev/tap0 c 36 16 chown 0.0 /dev/tap0 The second tap1 device was created too: mknod -m 600 /dev/tap1 c 36 17 chown 0.0 /dev/tap1

Moving to libvirt-users where it belongs. On Thu, 2019-04-18 at 06:47 +0000, Tal Attaly wrote: > Hi, > I have bridge type interface defined with slot 3 - > <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x03' function='0x0'/> > but after running virsh domxml-to-native qemu-argv I get slot 2- > -netdev tap,fd=21,id=hostnet0 -device

Hello. I am trying to get multi paths running, i.e I want to specify 2 paths from a particular node to another. To test this, I am setting up the following scenario: I create 2 tap devices tap0 = 10.1.1.1/32 netmask 255.255.255.0 tap1 = 10.2.2.2/32 netmask 255.255.255.0 I then issue the route command: ip route add 10.3.3.3/32 nexthop via 10.1.1.2 nexthop via 10.2.2.3 The route table

Hi, I have some questions about running multiple tinc deamons. The docs say you can do it to support separate VPNs, but I don't see any examples. I have been running a single tinc vpn for months with no problems, now I'm trying to add a second separate vpn. I'm running the static tinc version 1.0pre7 (built Apr 9 2002 14:00:34, protocol 14) on Debian potato. I did not want to go

Hello list, Please don''t shoot me. I know I''m doing something with bonding that bonding wasn''t made for. I just want to give it a try. I want a simple mechanism to have a failover on a 24Mbit line to a 2Mbit line in case the 24Mbit line goes down. Between A and B there are two lines: a 24Mbit and a 2Mbit. I use two OpenVPN tunnels with tap devices: +-- tap0 (A)---

Hi, it seems that ipconfig has a problem if multiple devices are up and connected to the same network. It seems that it uses the wrong socket/device index to compare it to incoming packet. To be more precise, the packet gets discarded in do_pkt_recv as the ifindex from state differs always from the incoming packet To reproduce create two tap devices: $ sudo tunctl -u uli -t tap0

Folks, We have a setup where each mobile node connects with 1 or more tinc instances (over different links) to a central node. tinc is running in switch mode. The link is chosen by setting the IP address on the active link's interface, and the central node sees this after the first packet on the link, and moves the MAC address to a different 'ethernet port' (link). This works really

Hello All, I am trying to implement OpenVPN on Fedora core Linux 3 with the latest pathces installed. This server is used only as firewall/internet gateway/proxy/VPN server, with kernel 2.6.1-1.27.FC3 and kernel 2.6.1-1.27.FC3 SMP It has two NIC''s eth0 (10.0.0.150) connected to ADSL, eth1 (192.168.3.12) connected to the local network. I use shorewall 2.4 on this machine. I like to test

I have the following situation: A Linux 2.4.22 server: Physical ethernet: lan1 - Ethernet port (Internet) lan2 - Ethernet port (Cisco Switch, Trunk port) Tunnel: tap1 - OpenVPN in tcp-server mode VLAN's: lan2.201 lan2.202 lan2.203 tap1.201 tap1.202 tap1.203 Bridges: br201 (lan2.201, tap1.201) br202 (lan2.202, tap1.202) br203 (lan2.203, tap1.203) On the other end, the same type of server:

There has been numerous threads etc regarding this but all that has left me is more than a little confused :-(. I have setup and environment consisting of two OpenVPN tunnels and wish to load balance at the packet level between them. I am currently running on Linux edm 2.4.21-20.EL.c0custom #2 Tue Oct 12 08:52:23 BST 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux And have install Quagga at each end to provide

Hi everybody ! I'll try to explain first what I would like to do with the functionalities of tap and bridge interfaces, qemu, some isos(I used slax(slackware live cd)) and the forwarding mechanisms of the Linux kernel. I'd like to simulate such a network: Internet | (eth0:@public address) * host * | br0 (@192.168.0.254)

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 02:53:58PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > We used to stop the handling of tx when the number of pending DMAs > exceeds VHOST_MAX_PEND. This is used to reduce the memory occupation > of both host and guest. But it was too aggressive in some cases, since > any delay or blocking of a single packet may delay or block the guest > transmission. Consider the following

On 03/13/2014 09:28 AM, Jason Wang wrote: > On 03/10/2014 04:03 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 01:28:27PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> We used to stop the handling of tx when the number of pending DMAs >>>> exceeds VHOST_MAX_PEND. This is used to reduce the memory occupation >>>> of both host and guest. But it was too