similar to: live migration not working correctly

I have two hosts, vm1 and vm2, which are both running libvirt 0.7.0. They share a common ocfs2 file system that resides on a san, and have identical network configurations. I am running qemu-kvm 0.11.0 on ubuntu 9.10 servers. I start base32 on vm1 and it comes up (it also runs fine if started on vm2). Then from vm2 I do: vm2#: virsh -c qemu://vm1/system migrate --live base32 qemu://vm2/system

Using ubuntu 9.10 and libvir 0.7.0, when I do a migrate a domain from machine A to B, the migration "completes" but remains in a frozen state until I do a "suspend/resume" on it on B. Then it runs fully normally. What do I do to skip the suspend/resume steps? -- Daniel R. Bidwell | bidwell at andrews.edu Andrews University | Information Technology

Is anyone using Ext3 on a 2.4.x kernel with software raid5? Does it work correctly? Last I checked noone had tried it yet, but that was before I went away on vacation. -- Daniel R. Bidwell | bidwell@andrews.edu Andrews University Information Technology Services If two always agree, one of them is unnecessary "Friends don't let friends do DOS" "In theory, theory and practice

I remember that there used to be a problem with disk quotas on Ext3 and Raid5 on the 2.4.x kernel series. I am running 2.4.14 with Ext3 and Raid5 and am having problems with quotas and am wondering if I have something misconfigured or if this combination doesn't work yet. -- Daniel R. Bidwell | bidwell@andrews.edu Andrews University Information Technology Services If two always agree, one of

Hi all, When I migrate a live vm with two virtual disk images from one node to another. Bothe of the nodes are in the same LAN and there is no shared storage. I run the following command and get the output blew: yyang@node1:~$ sudo virsh migrate --live --persistent --copy-storage-all --unsafe --verbose vm1 qemu+ssh://192.168.1.3/system root@192.168.1.3's password: root@192.168.1.3's

[dropping multiple lists; let's just use libvirt-users] On 02/11/2015 02:45 PM, Edward Young wrote: > I perform a simple test, but failed. > > In the source, I create: base <- mid <- active (2 snapshots, the active > one is the current one) > In order to migrate this vm to the destination, I manually copy both base > and mid to the destination, and put them in the

On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 15:00:19 +0800, Luyao Zhong wrote: > Hi libvirt experts, > > I have some questions about live migration. I'm assuming you are not asking about post-copy migration, since it is a bit more complicated as the current state if split between the source and destination hosts and none of them can keep running without the other until migration finishes. > * If a

Hi! I was reading the Wiki about 'Live Disk Backup with Active Blockcommit, https://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Live-disk-backup-with-active-blockcommit and see that example shown seems to be using two different names for the same file. First showing the current block device in use: $ virsh domblklist vm1 Target Source ------------------------------------------------ vda

Hello I have a question regarding virsh migrate. I see this when I migrate a vm using the command --- virsh --connect=xen:///system migrate --live --verbose vm1 xen+ssh://node2/system --- I see the vm keeps running on node1 and on node2 its paused. Libvirt version is 5.1.0-8.11.6.x86_64 and hypervisor is Xen 4.12. No issues when running --- xl migrate vm1 node2 --- Any help is

On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote: > On 08/06/2014 10:06 AM, Yuanzhen Gu wrote: > > yes, I got your point, thanks very much Eric. > > not entirely, because you still top-posted. > > got it entirely this time, not top-posted. > > > > If I want to take a distributed snapshot, which need pause all the VMs > and >

Hi Eric, Please see the blew: On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote: > On 02/11/2015 02:07 PM, Edward Young wrote: > >>> What if this vm has a number of disk-only external snapshots? In the > >>> current version, how can live migrate this vm? > >> > >> Are the snapshots based on shared storage, or local-only

Hey folks, I've been experimenting with native NBD live migration w/ TLS and have a couple of questions. 1) It appears that in some cases modified default_tls_x509_cert_dir from qemu.conf is not respected, seems like virsh always expects a default location and does not check default_tls_x509_cert_dir: virsh # migrate vm1 qemu+tls://ratchet.lan/system --live --persistent --undefinesource

On 09/11/2015 10:18 AM, Jérôme wrote: >> Yep, that about covers it. Note that the --quiesce step in snapshot >> creation requires qemu-guest-agent running in the guest, and that you >> trust interaction with your guest. > > Yes, I think I get this. I don't really figure out what these cases > could be. We're using Debian Jessie and I installed

Hi, The xm vcpu-set command is able to set zero to the number of VCPU of a domain. Therefore I think that it is a natural result that the xm start command fails. But I think that a xm vcpu-set command must fail usually. # xm list Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 942 2 r----- 75.2 vm1

On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 22:43:30 -0700, Vjaceslavs Klimovs wrote: > Hey folks, > I've been experimenting with native NBD live migration w/ TLS and have > a couple of questions. > > 1) It appears that in some cases modified default_tls_x509_cert_dir > from qemu.conf is not respected, seems like virsh always expects a > default location and does not check

Hi Eric. Thank you so much for your quick and relieving answer. Le 2015-09-11 17:05, Eric Blake a écrit : > Yes, using active block-commit is the ideal way to perform a live backup. Great. > Yep, that about covers it. Note that the --quiesce step in snapshot > creation requires qemu-guest-agent running in the guest, and that you > trust interaction with your guest. Yes, I think

Hello, I recently compiled libvirt 1.0.1 and qemu 1.3.0 on Ubuntu 12.04. I have performed live snapshots on VMs using "virsh snapshot-create-as" and then later re-merge the images together using "virsh blockpull". I am wondering how I can do a couple of other operations on the images while the VM is running. For example, VM1 is running from the snap3 image, with the following

On 08/06/2014 10:06 AM, Yuanzhen Gu wrote: > yes, I got your point, thanks very much Eric. not entirely, because you still top-posted. > > If I want to take a distributed snapshot, which need pause all the VMs and > then take snapshot, how can I control the pause for all the VMs? You mean, you have multiple VMs, and want to take a snapshot of all their storage at the same point in

On 08/06/2014 11:17 AM, Yuanzhen Gu wrote: >> Guest freeze/thaw (virDomainFSFreeze) only works on a live guest. So >> what you will have to do is: >> >> virDomainFSFreeze(vm1, ...) >> virDomainFSFreeze(vm2, ...) >> virDomainSuspend(vm1) >> virDomainSuspend(vm2) >> virDomainSnapshotCreateXML(vm1, ...) >> virDomainSnapshotCreateXML(vm2, ...)

I'm playing with google-authenticator libpam https://code.google.com/p/google-authenticator/ It appears to be failing the "make test" on CentOS 5.9 32bit. ./pam_google_authenticator_unittest Testing base32 encoding Testing base32 decoding Testing HMAC_SHA1 Loading PAM module Running tests, querying for verification code Testing failed login attempt Testing