similar to: poor network performance to one of two guests

Hello: I have a host running two KVM guests. The guests use br0 and each has a static IP address. I am trying to figure out if there is a way to use snmpd on the host to measure the traffic usage of the guests. I do not want to require anything running on the guests since I do not control them. Looking at netstat -in on the host, I see this info: Kernel Interface table Iface MTU Met

I am running KVM virtualization with libvirtd (libvirt) 0.10.2 in bridged network mode, however I still have the default virtual network bridge/interfaces and dnsmasq on the host. What I am trying to understand is whether or not dnsmasq and the virtual network (*virbr0, Vnet0 and Vnet1*) still play any role. If not, can I remove them? On most virtual hosts I see they are left around even when a

On 12/15/18 9:54 AM, daggs wrote: > Greetings, > > I have two vms, one is a router and the other one is a client, for some reason, the client vm is unable get ip via dhcp from the router vm. > here are outputs: > vm1.xml: > <interface type='bridge'> > <mac address='52:54:00:54:78:be'/> > <source bridge='virbr0'/>

dummy0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr C6:C8:2A:04:FD:23 BROADCAST NOARP MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B) lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:65536 Metric:1 RX

I am running NOX controller with a python script that prints out the destination mac and the source mac for each packet arriving at the now controller and then floods it out. So here's what happening: With em1 connected, all the packets that arrive at em1 are coming to the controller and printing out the details. However, without em1 connected to the OVS, when I have the following setup:

Hey, I have KVM installed on my Fedora 17 box. I added the network interfaces of the virtual machines to the openvswitch bridge as follows: ____ ____ / VM1\______br0_______/ em1\ \____/ | \____/ | _|_ /VM2\ \____/ virbr0 is the virtual network switch VM1 and VM2 are on the same subnet having tap interfaces vnet0 and vnet1 respectively. em1 is the default

Hi, I have a fc14 box with two interfaces that I'm having some difficulty setting up a bridge properly. I have a few kvm guests set up and running, but I've switched from using NetworkManager to using standard networking with a bridge. I've modified the ifcfg-eth0 and created ifcfg-br0 as per the standard documentation, but I think I'm having routing problems. This is what the

Greetings, I have two vms, one is a router and the other one is a client, for some reason, the client vm is unable get ip via dhcp from the router vm. here are outputs: vm1.xml: <interface type='bridge'> <mac address='52:54:00:54:78:be'/> <source bridge='virbr0'/> <model type='virtio'/> <address

I am running Fedora 16 64bit and installed libvirt. I have the VM running with arm emulation with this one issue I can't figure out. I used Virtual Machine Manager to manage the VM and can access its console there. The Ethernet appears to be eth1 and the guest can set an IP on it etc. However, I cannot see any traffic from the Host when dumping any of the interfaces. I've tried

host and guest both centos 5.5 network is 192.168.62.40 host is setup as follows [root at cloud2 ~]# ifconfig br0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1A:64:12:10:D9 inet addr:192.168.62.199 Bcast:192.168.63.255 Mask:255.255.254.0 inet6 addr: fe80::21a:64ff:fe12:10d9/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:1705488

Hi all Greetings from Patagonia Argentina - this is my first message to this list. I''m having a weird problem: when I reboot some domU, some OTHER domU gets killed. Scenario: > cat /etc/SuSE-release SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 (x86_64) VERSION = 11 PATCHLEVEL = 1 > uname -sri Linux 2.6.32.43-0.4-xen x86_64 > rpm -qa | grep xen- kernel-xen-base-2.6.32.43-0.4.1

inquiry about differences between the tap and the vnet in the virt-manager Greetings! I encounter a problem about the network when using virt-manager to create and run a VM. when I want to establish a network bridge for the guest OS, I generally use two kinds of ways described as fellow : First method : create a bridge with the help of linux commad: brctl, or Second method : using

Hello, I am facing some problems in bridged networking. I have successfully created a bridge br0 and added a virtual machine to it. Now the address of virtual machine is 10.1.3.31. I am able to connect to this virtual machine by another computer on same network. The virtual machine is hosting a simple python http server on port 8000, while some other service is running on port 80 When I try

Hi, I have an existing fedora14 system with two interfaces and several virtual interfaces (as in eth0:0, etc). They are currently configured to not be controlled by NetworkManager, but just standard network services. I've recently started working with libvirtd, so I also have a virbr0 interface as well that has its own network and is masquerading the networking for the single KVM instance I

Hello all, Basically my problem is how can i access a virtual machine from local network. I am able to do so from the host PC put not from other PC's on the same network. here is my what i did so far (http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking#NAT_forwarding_.28aka_.22virtual_networks.22.29) cat '/etc/libvirt/qemu/networks/default.xml' <network>

Am 2017-03-07 13:01, schrieb Michal Privoznik: > On 03/07/2017 11:44 AM, Marko Weber | 8000 wrote: >> >> >> (sorry, dont know how i put my posting into an reply to an other issue >> before, >> new posting to sepearte it, big sorry) >> >> >> >> >> Hello list, >> >> i updated on a gentoo system from libvirtd 2.5 to

.... I have a 64-bit CentOS 5.6 VM running on a 64-bit FC14 host, libvirt 0.8.3-10.fc14, 64-bit. I am getting messages in my syslog file, 2 about every 20 min. about dnsmasq: Aug 17 04:53:52 Q6600 dnsmasq-dhcp[1969]: DHCPREQUEST(virbr0) 192.168.122.213 52:54:00:a4:98:a3 Aug 17 04:53:52 Q6600 dnsmasq-dhcp[1969]: DHCPACK(virbr0) 192.168.122.213 52:54:00:a4:98:a3 Aug 17 05:20:13 Q6600

inquiry about differences between the tap and the vnet in the virt-manager Greetings! I encounter a problem about the network when using virt-manager to create and run a VM. when I want to establish a network bridge for the guest OS, I generally use two kinds of ways described as fellow : First method : create a bridge with the help of linux commad: brctl, or Second method : using

Greetings, I'm attempting to get several virtual machines setup on a Fedora19 host system, with the traditional bridge network devices (br0, br1, etc). I've done this many times before with older versions of Fedora (16, 14, etc), and it just works. However, for reasons that I cannot figure out, the bridge doesn't seem to be working in Fedora19. While I can successfully connect to

Hi there, I've installed a new KVM-Server. The routing in all instances are only working after "arp -s ip_of_router mac_of_router" Server: CentOS7, KVM Clients: CentOS6 and Fedora 21 What going wrong? [root at bgstkvmlr01 ~]# ifconfig bond0: flags=5187<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MASTER,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::3ed9:2bff:fe0b:c706 prefixlen 64 scopeid