similar to: KVM virtio bonding bandwidth problem

Hi, I have been playing this weekend with bonding on PCI netcards and found that all of netcards I have, but old 3com, do not support MII. So bonding is not going to happen with them. Do you have some pci netcards supporting MII successfully running on bonging? Thanks, David Hrb??

Hi all, Lustre 1.8.3 is available on the Sun Download Center Site. http://www.sun.com/software/products/lustre/get.jsp Our forwarding link has not yet been updated but should be shortly, so you can either find your way in through: http://www.sun.com/downloads/index.jsp?tab=2#L and look for Lustre 1.8.3 near the bottom of the "L" section. or

Hi all, Lustre 1.8.3 is available on the Sun Download Center Site. http://www.sun.com/software/products/lustre/get.jsp Our forwarding link has not yet been updated but should be shortly, so you can either find your way in through: http://www.sun.com/downloads/index.jsp?tab=2#L and look for Lustre 1.8.3 near the bottom of the "L" section. or

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 02:13:02AM +0200, Martin Jeppesen wrote: > I was wondering, if you can help me out with a answer or two about > migrating file based RHEL5.4 Xen guests to RHEL5.5 KVM? > > Reading the source code to virt-v2v, it seams to me that migrating > RHEL 5.4 file based guests would be: > > * Log in to the guest > # yum install kernel > # vi /etc/rc.local

Hi, excluding the Frankengrade from CENTOS5.3 to upstream RHEL5.4, is there are procedure / repository access / nightly builds / ... to what will be CENTOS 5.4? URLs? Howtos? Discussion threads or notes? I checked help, wiki and forums and google, but came up empty. Of course, this kind of use is depending on the way the new upstream RHEL sources are processed, so maybe there

Hi , I am getting the delay in pinging (from different network) , the guest after live migration . Here is the scenario: 0. OS : RHEL5.4 86_64 1. Host-A. Port eth1 , it is trunked with three subnets xxx.xx.15.xxx xxx.xx.16.xxx xxx.xx.17.xxx Guest created on 15, 16 ,17 subnets. Gust15-A created on subnet 15 Gust16-A

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76319 Priority: medium Bug ID: 76319 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: [NVE6] MMIO FAULT, black screen on K2100M QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: blocker Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: d-bugzilla at moens.cc

Hi all, I've started playing with kvm on CentOS 5.5, with not much success so far. In a nutshell, I have the same problem as http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/2010-April/001854.html I followed the RHEL5 virtualization guide to set up a bridge interface br0, and then used virt-install (rather than virt-manager - I like automation) to set up the vm. It hangs at some point.

xen-3.0.3-94.el5_4.2 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5xen RHEL5.4 x86_64 I''ve got a dom0 that does nothing but have a DomU created. The DomU gets plenty of load. Over time, the dom0''s ipconntrack table fills up but not the DomU. Once it gets full I can restart iptables and it''s fine. The strange thing is this only happens on hosts I have provided (hardware and hosting) from one

From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 22:48:26 +0100 > On 01/29/2016 10:45 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote: >> Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: >> >>> On 01/25/2016 05:24 PM, Bj?rnar Ness wrote: >>>> As subject says, 802.3ad bonding is not working with virtio network model.

I'm try to bond a few interfaces together with the hopes of getting increased throughput, and I'm using a cisco Catalyst 2900 as the switch. I've tried using mode 0, 5, and 6 with nothing special on the switch, and mode 4 with some ports "trunked" together (I have a feeling that the "trunking" that the 2900 does is not 802.3ad, as it disabled the ports it saw as

On 01/30/2016 07:59 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> > Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 22:48:26 +0100 > >> On 01/29/2016 10:45 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote: >>> Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 01/25/2016 05:24 PM, Bj?rnar Ness wrote: >>>>> As subject

On 01/30/2016 07:59 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> > Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 22:48:26 +0100 > >> On 01/29/2016 10:45 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote: >>> Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 01/25/2016 05:24 PM, Bj?rnar Ness wrote: >>>>> As subject

I am working on setting up an NFS server, which will mainly serve files to web servers, and I want to setup two bonds. I have a question regarding *which* bonding mode to use. None of the documentation I have read suggests any mode is "better" than other with the exception of specific use cases (e.g. switch does not support 802.3ad, active-backup). Since my switch *does* support

Hi, may be there are some best practice suggestions for the "best mode" for channel bonding interface? Or in other words, when should/would I use which mode? E.g. I do have some fileservers connected to the users lan and to some ISCSI Storages. Or some Webservers only connected to the LAN. The switches are all new cisco models. I've read sone docs (1), (2) and (3) so the theory

I have a bonded interface running in mode 1 which is active/passive and no issue with this. I need to change it to mode 0 for active/active setup. Does mode 0 is dependent on the switches configuration? My setup is: 2 links from bonded interface is connected to different switches. When I change to mode0 from mode1 , bond0 is not coming up. These are the steps I performed 1) changed to options

Hi, I am in need of ordering a new server here for our asterisk solution. Since the corporate standard is Dell we need to stick to a dell server. We used to deploy 2900III without any issues, however now they are almost not available any more and are looking at a new solution. Has anyone tried any of the new Dell R (series) servers with Asterisk, utilizing Digium PRI cards? The biggest issue I

On 01/29/2016 10:45 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote: > Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: > >> On 01/25/2016 05:24 PM, Bj?rnar Ness wrote: >>> As subject says, 802.3ad bonding is not working with virtio network model. >>> >>> The only errors I see is: >>> >>> No 802.3ad response from the link partner for any adapters

On 01/29/2016 10:45 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote: > Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: > >> On 01/25/2016 05:24 PM, Bj?rnar Ness wrote: >>> As subject says, 802.3ad bonding is not working with virtio network model. >>> >>> The only errors I see is: >>> >>> No 802.3ad response from the link partner for any adapters

With the current talk on bonding, I have a few questions of my own. I'm setting up a KVM host with CentOS 6.3 x86_64 on which I'd like to attach the VMs to a bonded interface. My target setup is one where two GigE NICs are bonded and then the KVM bridge interface is attached to the bonded interface. Initially I tried to use the balance-alb mode (mode6), but had little luck (receiving