similar to: [PATCH] appliance: Remove repo from appliance filename (RHBZ#638901).

Couple of notes: (1) You may need to 'make clean' after applying this patch. There is some missing dep so it seems the appliance isn't fully rebuilt. (2) [Comment mainly directed to Matt] This is not a candidate to be automatically added to the stable 1.2 branch. It's far too large of a change for a stable release. Since this change may be required for V2V, please clone

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part -------------- >From 29f37dd36c836974d5db53d6f26571f7708b3172 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part -------------- >From 0420307349a71b7b9af58003c2591fc33b7939af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard

The Wikipedia pages about schedulers are quite informative. I don't know _why_ this makes a difference, but it does seem to make a small one. Even though for a single process (guestfsd) it would seem that the choice of scheduler should make no difference. BTW the default scheduler in the guest is 'cfq'. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noop_scheduler http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CFQ

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part -------------- >From 1b289ce96bde557cf3706aa7417641355aa78f20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthew

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part -------------- >From 557f413e0bd1ad7bd0180ca28a5bfec854f23790 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part -------------- >From 256f39edaac0c83eb428c8c212586ebd750cbfc2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part -------------- >From ba39ced8804765705f4c61a92db0fddb8d672c7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard

Using this patch I'm able to edit files on a FUSE mounted (guestmount) filesystem. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part -------------- >From 8fc878ed0a5c192f188d9793a79071f4012fbf70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part -------------- >From 7d746ba6915e3c0d8fbe41053da64f4e9fa11cd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard W.M.

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part -------------- >From 819975af019d4213721e40a2dc49ef5d2f9e9bc4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard W.M.

This seems to be the completed fix for: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526717 -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 75 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part --------------

This series of patches fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597112 -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora

This patch is in preparation for allowing libguestfs to use alternate "vmchannel" implementations. Although it's not a functional change, I think it is worthwhile on its own because use of the term "vmchannel" in the names of constants is inappropriate since (a) the "-net channel" option is now properly known upstream as "guestfwd", and (b) no one can

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 09:40:44PM +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > Hm..it's been 10 mins..I don't see anything more in the file where I > redirected stdout of 'febootstrap' cmd. > > Roughly, can you guess how much time this takes? For me it has so far taken a lot longer. The problem is that the number of dependent packages is probably 100s. If you want something

-- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 75 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part -------------- >From d15195bad9e50f4d80e84c39100a217a260fc806 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Jones

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part -------------- >From 01d3291514098b5d716a763947a376d78118ac41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard W.M.

I've tested this with both upstream qemu from git, and the old non-broken qemu from Fedora 12. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora