similar to: 'make uninstall' does not clean up ocaml binding files

Dear all, I have 122 vectors named from L1 to L122. Now I hope to take log to each of the series, say L1 <- log(L1) ... L122<-log(L122) Can anyone show me a iterative way to make the job simple. I mean the way something like for(i in 1:122){ ... } or other similar methods. Many thanks. Jin

Hello everyone, this is my first mail. I am trying to pxe boot an ISO CD. I configured DHCP and TFTP. In DHCP config file I define the boot folder as filename "pxelinux.0"; In TFTP config file in /tftpboot/pxelinux.cfg/default I wrote the boot option as LABEL ccc LINUX memdisk INITRD ccc.iso APPEND raw Now I have some problems and parts I don't understand. 1) I downloaded and

Hi, I have a feature request for 'parse', and possibly the 'R CMD INSTALL' command to display more informative error information. Specifically, after making several modifications to a package on my system (the package name is irrelevant; I'm using R 2.3.1 on Debian): $ R CMD INSTALL seas * Installing *source* package 'seas' ... ** R ** data ** inst ** preparing

That is correct. Most of the time this isn't an issue because the new ldb modules, linking to the new symbol versions, overwrite the old files on 'make install'. However we chose to remove some obsolete ldb modules in the 4.12 cycle and so the old modules remain, triggering these warnings. We notice the old modules because we try to load all the modules during startup of ldb to

Hello, i've been here with this poblem before, now i installed the berkley db4 in /usr. But now it report another error, still at the same file. Please reply if you think you know the reason... I'm still running 4.6-STABLE, and would soon like the new 4.8-STABLE kernel made. Regards, Johan Christiansen _________ ===> vesa rm -f setdef0.c setdef1.c setdefs.h setdef0.o setdef1.o vesa.ko

Hi everyone, I have just updated samba from 4.11.6 to 4.12.0, compiled by the sources. Everything was fine and AD server is ok , but when I call samba-tool this error always appear: ldb: unable to dlopen /usr/lib64/samba/ldb/local_password.so : /usr/lib64/samba/libsamdb-common-samba4.so: version `SAMBA_4.11.6' not found (required by /usr/lib64/samba/ldb/local_password.so) ldb: unable to

I installed ferret and it cleaned me out!!! I do the following: __________________________ # gem install ferret Need to update 4 gems from http://gems.rubyforge.org .... complete Select which gem to install for your platform (i386-linux) 1. ferret 0.11.4 (ruby) 2. ferret 0.11.4 (mswin32) 3. ferret 0.11.3 (ruby) 4. ferret 0.11.2 (ruby) 5. Skip this gem 6. Cancel installation > 3 Building

On 5/5/2017 9:10 ??, Marcelo Roccasalva wrote: > xfs_admin -U restore /dev/vdal Bingo! I had to unmount the boot partition (being in Troubleshooting mode), run the above command, which provided a new UUID and at last the partition was recognized as xfs. (I forgot to copy the output to paste here.) I then mounted the boot partition again, chrooted, grub2-install'ed successfully,

As proposed earlier: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2010-April/msg00005.html I have created libguestfs 1.2 stable series and 1.3 development series. I have released tarballs for libguestfs 1.2.0 and 1.3.0. These are exactly the same as version 1.0.89 (I didn't even change the version number inside them). http://libguestfs.org/download/?C=M;O=D This is just to get things

On 5/5/2017 8:29 ??, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > I am very puzzled with "unknown filesystem". After more googling, I found this bug report with a very recent fix: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399487 It seems to me that this may be relevant in our case. If so, may it be that this fix has not been rolled out to CentOS repos yet? What is your opinion and your

I currently have an AGI that calls the Festival text2wave app to write a wav file that my dialplan plays into a call with the Background() command. But the voice sounds terrible: like SAM, the 1980s 6502 voice synthesizer. I tried to slow it down by calling (text2wav -eval "(Parameter.set 'Duration_Stretch 1.4)" -scale 2.0 [...]), but it still sounds like it's talking while

Hello: I recently attempted to update the ARM cross-compilation setup I had with llvm, and it did not work, so I wanted to revert back to my initial configuration. I reconfigured/make/make install'ed my llvm which executed fine, and then cleared out my llvm-gcc obj and install folders, and reconfigured gcc from within llvm-gcc/obj as follows: ../llvm-gcc-4.2-2.9.source/configure

I installed Tomb Raider II under wine under linux; Since there have been some problems i need to uninstall it. But i'm unable to do that with the wine uninstaller. when i try to uninstall it through wine uninstaller i get the following error message: "the file c:\Program Files\Core Design\Uninst.isu is corrupted: fail to uninstall" so I have to do that manually; removing the

Hello all, I am in the process of adding a new return type for the hivex ABI, and I found what I think is an error. I'm not sure, because I don't understand the OCaml binding data structures. Can somebody inform me if the patch below actually corrects a problem? --Alex --- generator/generator.ml | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git

Hi all, I'm considering using ocaml for some experiments I want to try -- does the binding currently support reading existing bitcode, or just generating it? I want to try out some program transformation ideas that would probably be rather easier to express in ocaml than C++. Thank you in advance, Sarah Thompson

On Dec 10, 2007, at 16:52, Sarah Thompson wrote: > I'm considering using ocaml for some experiments I want to try -- > does the binding currently support reading existing bitcode No, but it's easily added… — Gordon

> Is it reasonable for me to hack on this, or would you rather do it > yourself? (If the latter, you would be very much in my debt...) Or the other way around, or something. :) [s]

On 2007-12-10, at 18:04, Sarah Thompson wrote: > >> Is it reasonable for me to hack on this, or would you rather do it >> yourself? (If the latter, you would be very much in my debt...) > > Or the other way around, or something. :) :) I'm adding it now. — Gordon

On Monday 10 December 2007 23:52, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > On 2007-12-10, at 18:28, Jon Harrop wrote: > > Incidentally, should more OCaml stuff beyond the bindings be part of > > LLVM or would it be better to fork them into a separate project > > Can you be more specific than "stuff"? I'm thinking of a library that compiles an AST represented by an OCaml data

On Dec 12, 2007, at 08:16, Jon Harrop wrote: > On Monday 10 December 2007 23:52, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > >> On 2007-12-10, at 18:28, Jon Harrop wrote: >> >>> Incidentally, should more OCaml stuff beyond the bindings be part >>> of LLVM or would it be better to fork them into a separate project >> >> Can you be more specific than