similar to: [PATCH] Check error returns from posix_fallocate (RHBZ#579664).

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part -------------- >From 29f37dd36c836974d5db53d6f26571f7708b3172 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part -------------- >From 256f39edaac0c83eb428c8c212586ebd750cbfc2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part -------------- >From ba39ced8804765705f4c61a92db0fddb8d672c7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard

Using this patch I'm able to edit files on a FUSE mounted (guestmount) filesystem. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part -------------- >From 8fc878ed0a5c192f188d9793a79071f4012fbf70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part -------------- >From 7d746ba6915e3c0d8fbe41053da64f4e9fa11cd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard W.M.

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part -------------- >From 2e0dca6f12812bd3d7e58d725931fe9ae1c0c7de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard W.M.

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part -------------- >From 819975af019d4213721e40a2dc49ef5d2f9e9bc4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard W.M.

This seems to be the completed fix for: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526717 -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 75 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part --------------

This series of patches fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597112 -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora

Couple of notes: (1) You may need to 'make clean' after applying this patch. There is some missing dep so it seems the appliance isn't fully rebuilt. (2) [Comment mainly directed to Matt] This is not a candidate to be automatically added to the stable 1.2 branch. It's far too large of a change for a stable release. Since this change may be required for V2V, please clone

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part -------------- >From 1ff2c479a63574395903361bfb037e555c69ad26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From:

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 1:59 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > I found another problem which is sort of related to this thread. I > hit a time-out waiting for the disk to be unlocked after creation: > > > https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/commit/8081f54105bd990233f166170890192c1fd7d1f3#diff-5ca47c29ae13efa3959b8b28cf4dbd31R112 > line 112 > >

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -------------- next part -------------- >From 3ec1380eb6425b4f73024200817bd6b192d3b0b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard

Thank you Rich, I checked the version and found that it printed an old 1.17.17 version which was deployed before. But I remembered i did check the version in guestfish shell and it said 1.17.40 before that?then i totally ignored the fact i had another version involved. I`ve changed the LD_LIBRARY_PATH and the "undefined symbol" error disappeared.But some "inspection API not

Does FreeBSD have fallocate(2) or equivalent? On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote: > On 23 October 2017 at 18:49, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> > >> BTW, posix_fallocate() might provide better portability and decrease the > >> likelihood of falling back on ftruncate(). > >

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> If your system does not support fallocate(2), we use ftruncate(2) to >> create an output file. fallocate(2) succeeds even if your disk have less >> space than the

Hello, I found a strange problem with allocationg big files on drive. For example in guestfish I allocate large disk image for example: $ guestfish ><fs> allocate test.img 20G When an image allocating, there is a big slowdown of guest OSes, launched on host machine, and on different drives. For Linux guests with virtio drivers, there is no so big performance penalty, but for FreeBSD

Hello, I found a strange problem with allocationg big files on drive. For example in guestfish I allocate large disk image for example: $ guestfish ><fs> allocate test.img 20G When an image allocating, there is a big slowdown of guest OSes, launched on host machine, and on different drives. For Linux guests with virtio drivers, there is no so big performance penalty, but for FreeBSD

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:41 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 08:05:14PM +0000, Nir Soffer wrote: > > When using the sdk, you can select both the image format and sparse, so > you > > can create invalid combinations. oVirt selects the allocation for you. > > > > storage type image format sparse | allocation