similar to: File "lvs.ml", line 11... : Error: Unbound value Guestfs.create

FYI, while "make" succeeded in this directory on Friday, I ran "make clean" today from the top, then "make" and got this: Making all in examples make[3]: Entering directory `/home/j/w/co/libguestfs/ocaml/examples' ocamlfind ocamlopt \ -warn-error A -I .. mlguestfs.cmxa lvs.ml -o lvs File "lvs.ml", line 11, characters 10-24: Error:

>From 3a09d409df89d72ca476ed829739b4aacf08735d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering <meyering at redhat.com> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 16:09:19 +0200 Subject: [PATCH libguestfs] build: fix compile error Link demo scripts with just-build library, not the installed one. * ocaml/examples/Makefile.am (OCAMLFINDFLAGS): New variable. (lvs, viewer): Use it. This fix is based on a suggestion

OCaml has a small runtime which is statically linked into the virt tools (providing things like GC and primitives). Since OCaml 4.03 it has been possible to select variants of this runtime, one of which is compiled with -fPIC, using ‘ocamlopt -runtime-variant _pic’. This has performance implications on i686, but is relatively free on other architectures. Since it (in theory) adds to the

i'm trying to setup LVS, and tried both the lvs-dr and the lvs-nat, but can't get any to work. I'm hoping people here can answer a few questions that might help and shed light onto the situation? #1 with regards to the Real Servers, is there anything that needs to be configured other that the http service? I ask this, because I suspect yes, and it has to do with what type of LVS you

Later versions of gcc include an option in the form of --param=name=value. This patch adds support for this and continues to support the --param name=value option. Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano <mpagano at gentoo.org> --- klcc/klcc.in | 15 +++++++++++---- 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/klcc/klcc.in b/klcc/klcc.in index 711a832..5d00bfd 100644 ---

* Richard W.M. Jones: >> Wouldn't a rule without commands such as >> >> mlguestfs.cmxa: mlguestfs.cma >> >> also prevent make from building the two targets in parallel? > > Doesn't that mean that if mlguestfs.cmxa is out of date, simply > running the mlguestfs.cma rule will build it (which it won't)? Not sure if I understand you. If I cause

* Richard W.M. Jones: >> I think that an extra target (mlguestfs.cmxa: mlguestfs.cma) would make >> the .NOTPARALLEL unnecessary. > > Right, I remember this was a problem now. > > It was fixed by: > > https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/commit/dce94f3e266ed3f1fc634a1ef6953f2db1510963 > > Do you think we could re-add the stamp-file / touch $@ ? Sure, it

On Wednesday 28 January 2015 14:25:38 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > --- > sparsify/copying.ml | 4 +++- > sparsify/in_place.ml | 4 +++- > sparsify/utils.ml | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/sparsify/copying.ml b/sparsify/copying.ml > index 8d77964..165dd6e 100644 > --- a/sparsify/copying.ml > +++

Once ocamlfind is installed, 'make' failed for me with: ocamlfind ocamlc -g -annot -safe-string -warn-error CDEFLMPSUVYZX+52-3 -ccopt '-gdwarf' -package unix -c NBD.ml -o NBD.cmo File "NBD.ml", line 1: Error: Could not find the .cmi file for interface NBD.mli. make[2]: *** [Makefile:823: NBD.cmo] Error 2 I'm not positive that this is the perfect fix, but it at least

>> You need to figure out how to pass -rdynamic to the linker, like I said before. http://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/OCamlLangImpl7.html mentions it, but I don't know enough about the ocaml build process to say whether that'll work. I believe I'm already doing that, properly by passing -ccopt -rdynamic to ocamlopt: ocamlopt -cc g++ -ccopt -rdynamic -linkall $(LIBFILES) -o alpha

I believe this patch has now been superseded by Hilko's commit here: https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/commit/f75142c577255b30f2a8e1d27baa5fd185594197 Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#)

* Richard W.M. Jones: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 02:35:56PM +0100, Hilko Bengen wrote: >> diff --git a/ocaml/Makefile.am b/ocaml/Makefile.am >> index 5dd2c9b..708b2e7 100644 >> --- a/ocaml/Makefile.am >> +++ b/ocaml/Makefile.am > [...] >> +# Tell version 3.79 and up of GNU make to not build goals in this >> +# directory in parallel. >> +.NOTPARALLEL:

At the moment OpenStack uses kpartx and nbd to resize filesystems and inject files to guests. I sincerely hope they don't allow untrusted users to upload guest images / AMIs :-( To fix this I'm looking into adding libguestfs support as an optional backend in OpenStack. The only missing feature in libguestfs is the ability to call tune2fs on a filesystem. This patch series adds tune2fs

Hi, I need some special masq rules to allow internal servers to resolve public IP''s which are loadbalanced by LVS - the rule are: iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -m ipvs --vaddr <LVS PUBLIC IP>/32 --vport 80 -j SNAT --to-source <LVS INTERNAL IP> Also I need to enable: echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/vs/conntrack Currently I do all this from /etc/shorewall/started - but is

* Richard W.M. Jones: > (1) Removing .NOTPARALLEL. This fails, as expected. > > (2) mlguestfs.cmxa: mlguestfs.cma -- fails > > (3) mlguestfs.cmxa: | mlguestfs.cma -- fails after a longer time I find it strange that (2) and (3) fail. > (4) The attached patch which is derived from dce94f -- this ran > without failing for 120 iterations (and still going). The patch looks

Here's a patch to klcc.in from klibc-0.202. The context: I have an application, managed with GNU automake/autoconf. Packagers should be able to build the application with klibc if available, with plain gcc otherwise, as follows: $ cd ~/klibc-0.202 $ ... make linux symlink $ make bindir=$HOME/local/bin \ mandir=$HOME/local/man \ INSTALLDIR=$HOME/local \ SHLIBDIR=$HOME/local/shlib \

Hi guys, I''m not sure where to post for help on this one, shorewall or lvs, I''ll start with shorewall (only cause Tom is a gun at this stuff, and is polite enough to tell me to bugger off to the LVS list if I''m posting in the wrong one ;) I have a single box that is my router/firewall/LVS. Internet -- eth0 - router/firewall - eth1 --- internal lan | eth2

When a disk image uses LVM thinp (thin provisioning), the guestfs_lvs API would return the thinp pools. This confused other APIs because thinp pools don't have corresponding /dev/VG/LV device nodes. Filter the LVs that are returned using "lv_role=public". Thanks: Fabian Deutsch --- daemon/lvm.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/daemon/lvm.c

This patch adds support to klcc for the --param parameter. Signed off by: Mike Pagano <mpagano at gentoo.org> --- klcc.in | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) --- klcc/klcc.in.orig 2011-03-21 08:35:02.130497501 -0400 +++ klcc/klcc.in 2011-03-21 08:47:21.025476293 -0400 @@ -159,6 +159,9 @@ while ( defined($a = shift(@ARGV)) ) { # gcc options, that force preprocessing mode

Every time I touch something, pieces fall off! It's a good thing this stuff isn't in production yet (for me I mean). So I had an LVS, configured with Piranha, directing http test transactions across two servers. I used Piranha to add another realserver. It appeared in the lvs.cf file, but didn't appear in the ipvsadm output. So I stopped and restarted Pulse. And now *none* of the