similar to: [PATCH] appliance: Add support for btrfs, GFS, GFS2, JFS, HFS, HFS+, NILFS, OCFS2

Make sure that /bin/sh is available in the appliance, and that path is provided by dash on Debian distributions. --- appliance/packagelist.in | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/appliance/packagelist.in b/appliance/packagelist.in index 78aedad0b..f92a6ce95 100644 --- a/appliance/packagelist.in +++ b/appliance/packagelist.in @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ ifelse(DEBIAN,1, dnl old name used in

This package in Fedora enables optional support for Windows 10 "CompactOS" (file-level compression), read-only, which is sufficient for inspecting Windows guests and doing certain types of modifications to them. Virt-v2v appears to work, but it may be that anything that involves modifying a compressed file might not work. I couldn't find the equivalent package in Debian or SUSE.

Hi all, If you have had experience hosting GFS/GFS2 on CentOS machines could you share you general impression on it? Was it realiable? Fast? Any issues or concerns? Also, how feasible is it to start it on just one machine and then grow it out if necessary? Thanks. Boris.

Added: - cdrtools: added as alternative to cdrkit - multipath-tools: contains kpartx (in AUR) Removed: - ntfsprogs: the package is no longer available, it has been completely replaced by ntfs-3g (already in packagelist.in) - zfs-fuse: no longer in AUR Signed-off-by: Tomáš Golembiovský <tgolembi@redhat.com> --- appliance/packagelist.in | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2

Hi, this is a prototype of something I've around for some time. Basically it is about adding new appliances in addition to the main one currently used and kept up-to-date automatically: this way it is possible to create new appliances with extra packages, to be used in specific contexts (like virt-rescue, with more network/recovery tools) without filling the main appliance. It's still

There had been a virtual package "diff" that depended on diffutils, but that's gone in wheezy/sid, too. --- appliance/packagelist.in | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/appliance/packagelist.in b/appliance/packagelist.in index b26ef23..4830962 100644 --- a/appliance/packagelist.in +++ b/appliance/packagelist.in @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ btrfs-progs

Hello, I'm deploing a new email cluster using Dovecot over GFS2. Actually I'm using courier over GFS. Actually I'm testing Dovecot with these parameters: mmap_disable = yes mail_fsync = always mail_nfs_storage = yes mail_nfs_index = yes lock_method = fcntl Are they correct? RedHat GFS support mmap, so is it better to enable it or leave it disabled? The documentation suggest the

Hello All, We are using Dovecot 1.1.3 to serve IMAP on a pair of clustered Postfix servers which share a fiber array via the GFS clustered filesystem. This all works very well for the most part, with the exception that certain operations are so inefficient on GFS that they generate significant I/O load and hurt performance. We are using the Maildir format on disk. We're also using

Hello list, we continue our tests using Dovecot on a RHEL 6.1 Cluster Backend with GFS2, also we are using dovecot as a Director for user node persistence, everything was ok until we started stress testing the solution with imaptest, we had many deadlocks, cluster filesystems corruptions and hangs, specially in index filesystem, we have configured the backend as if they were on a NFS like setup

On 26/02/16 10:12, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:16:22AM +0200, noxdafox wrote: >> According to autogen.sh output Perl bindings and virt tools seem to >> be missing, could it be related to this? Are the tests relying to >> such dependencies? > Yes, the tests rely on Perl bindings working, so I guess you need to > install whatever missing

Hello, maybe there is someone they can help and answer a question why i get these network screen on my ctdb clusters. I have two ctdb clusters. One physical and one in a vmware enviroment. So when i transfer any files (copy) in a samba share so i get such network curves with performance breaks. I dont see that the transfer will stop but why is that so? can i change anything or does anybody know

Hi everybody, I have tested CTDB+GFS2+CMAN under Debian. It works good but I do not understand some points. It is possible to run the CTDB defining it under services section in cluster.conf but running it on the second node shuts down the process at the first one. My CTDB configuration implies 2 active-active nodes. Does CTDB care if the node starts with clean_start="0" or

Hi. The short story... Rush job, never done clustered file systems before, vlan didn't support multicast. Thus I ended up with drbd working ok between the two servers but cman / gfs2 not working, resulting in what was meant to be a drbd primary/primary cluster being a primary/secondary cluster until the vlan could be fixed with gfs only mounted on the one server. I got the single server

Hi folks, years ago I had no problem installing CentOS7 on my iMac workstation (iMac Late 2015). The installation worked out of the box. Today I wanted to upgrade to CentOS8 and while configuring the partitions I get an error that the installation can not start because: "HFS+ ESP needed and mounted on /boot/efi". In fact they are the same partition as for CentOS7. Is this a regression

Hi all, I?ve got a HFS+(not journaled) volume connected to my centos6.2 test server, i installed the kmod-hfs(plus) packages and read/write works all fine. but since i?m going to use this for serving mac home folders via netatalk i would like to mount it with support for Extended Attributes and acl?s. so i add user_xattr and acl to my fstab options but then it fails to mount. checking the

Hi all, Where i want to arrive: 1) having two storage server replicating partition with DRBD 2) exporting via GNBD from the primary server the drbd with GFS2 3) inporting the GNBD on some nodes and mount it with GFS2 Assuming no logical error are done in the last points logic this is the situation: Server 1: LogVol09, DRDB configured as /dev/drbd0 replicated to Server 2. DRBD seems to work

Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Feb 20, 2009 20:23 +0300, Kirill Kuvaldin wrote: >> I'm evaluating different cluster file systems that can work with large >> clustered environment, e.g. hundreds of nodes connected to a SAN over >> FC. >> >> So far I looked at OCFS2 and GFS2, they both worked nearly the same >> in terms of performance, but since I ran my

I really need to share a filesystem and I''d rather not have to export it from one domU to another so I tried mounting it with GFS2 and then OCFS2. Both caused the xenU kernel to oops just as the mount was attempted. I assumed that a FUSE-based solution would be a little less problematic (if only because it doesn''t require kernel patches) but it also caused an oops right when

Hello: I am planning to implement GFS for my university as a summer project. I have 10 servers each with SAN disks attached. I will be reading and writing many files for professor's research projects. Each file can be anywhere from 1k to 120GB (fluid dynamic research images). The 10 servers will be using NIC bonding (1GB/network). So, would GFS be ideal for this? I have been reading a lot

The ELF NEEDED are used to determine guestfsd's library dependencies with help from the dynamic linker and the package manager. This was prompted by Debian bug #972241 which was caused by a libtirpc package renaming in Debian/unstable because the SONAME had been changed. --- appliance/Makefile.am | 26 ++++++++++++++++- appliance/packagelist.in | 62