similar to: [ANNOUNCE] Version 1.0.57 released

Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong at cn.fujitsu.com> --- .mailmap | 13 +++++++++++++ AUTHORS | 4 ++-- Makefile.am | 5 +---- 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) create mode 100644 .mailmap diff --git a/.mailmap b/.mailmap new file mode 100644 index 0000000..504fd79 --- /dev/null +++ b/.mailmap @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +Jim Meyering <meyering at redhat.com>

This patch isn't quite finished. I also need to modify the virt-inspector "query mode" so that it can display the architecture. Nevertheless, text and XML output works for both Linux and Windows guests. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 75 OCaml packages (the

This just duplicated libosinfo information, and because it was never tested it didn't work most of the time. --- docs/C_SOURCE_FILES | 2 - generator/actions_inspection.ml | 67 --- generator/actions_inspection_deprecated.ml | 61 +++ inspector/Makefile.am | 11 +- inspector/example-debian-netinst-cd.xml | 23 -

These small fixes are required to fix the build and tests on Debian (using the debootstrap/debirf appliance). There is currently another bug in the Debian tests which I'm looking into. hexdump always fails as follows: libguestfs: error: hexdump: hexdump: /test123: hexdump: /sysroot/test123: Bad file descriptor Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Looking at epel-testing, while libguestfs-* 1.0.57-2 is available, virt-inspector does not appear to be. http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/libguestfs/EL-5/libguestfs.spec?view=markup shows the virt-inspector bits commented out, and http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/libguestfs/EL-5/libguestfs.spec?view=log doesn't appear to have an explanation. Wuzzup? :)

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0747 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0747.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: d3eed53f9326c888bfb231a0e92b6b3d system-config-cluster-1.0.57-3.el5_5.1.noarch.rpm Source: 7e7f2af329a4804978305662163f28e0

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0747 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0747.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 93c11448886960214f38866f8d5cccb9 system-config-cluster-1.0.57-3.el5_5.1.noarch.rpm Source: 7e7f2af329a4804978305662163f28e0

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1066 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1066.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 08b6544edd13612cb661115588ce0faf system-config-cluster-1.0.57-9.noarch.rpm Source: 8a280a1146fc63968d30d45f1863250c system-config-cluster-1.0.57-9.src.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1066 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1066.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 903ef96f6f4225b9cf958494e17550f2 system-config-cluster-1.0.57-9.noarch.rpm Source: 8a280a1146fc63968d30d45f1863250c system-config-cluster-1.0.57-9.src.rpm --

The following updates are released with the CentOS-5.10 Release Announcement. You can see the individual announcements by viewing the CentOS-CR-Announce Mailing List here: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-cr-announce/2013-October/thread.html If you want the updates as fast as possible during CentOS point releases, please consider enabling the CentOS Continuous Release Repository:

it's strange since this kernel don't have kvm support, qemu or qemu-kvm or kvm package is not added. even though it was said that 5.4 will support kvm?:-( Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > New Packages in RHEL 5.4 Beta: > ******************************** > blktrace-1.0.0-6.el5.src.rpm > celt051-0.5.1.3-0.el5.src.rpm > etherboot-5.4.4-10.el5.src.rpm >

v9 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00139.html This depends on these three series (the first two being single minor patches): https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00215.html There is no substantive change. I

This depends on the patch series "[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml." (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html) v8 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00274.html v9: - I split up the mega-patch into a more reviewable series of smaller, incremental patches. There are some other changes vs v8, but

This fixes almost everything. Note that it adds an extra commit which fixes the whole utf8/iconv business. It's probably better to list what isn't fixed: (1) I didn't leave the osinfo code around because I'm still haven't looked too closely at virt-builder-repository. Can't we just fetch this code from the git history when we need it? (2) I didn't change the way

v10: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00245.html No actual change here, but I rebased and retested. Also this series now does not depend on any other patch series since everything else needed is upstream. Rich.

v6 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new virt-inspector to see if I can find any

v7 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid