similar to: Re: Forum Software Update and mailing list gateway

Hi folks, the volunteer admins for forum.winehq.org have been deleting an increasing amount of spam lately, and it seems clear that we need to update the forum software to a new release with better antispam features. The catch is, the mailing list gateway plugin is not compatible with the new version of the forum. It looks like the users are split about 90% on the forum and about 10% on the

How do I go about setting up a mailing list gateway in forum format? Who would I need authorization from? Thanks, Nelson -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

On 2/10/19 3:46 PM, Michael A. Peters via dovecot wrote: > On 2/10/19 3:42 PM, Noel Butler via dovecot wrote: >> On 10/02/2019 12:49, Benny Pedersen via dovecot wrote: >> >>> >>> fixing mailman will be the fail, solve it by letting opendkim and >>> opendmarc not reject detected maillist will be solution, >> >> >> A general broad mailing

Hi all, First off - this is not flame bait or a troll. It's a genuine question. Since the forum gateway was introduced, it is my opinion that this list is getting flooded with newbie questions. Check the "I just installed Ubuntu" thread for a typical example. I wish to silently remove all wine-forum posts and their replies from my inbox. I plan to filter based on From:

OT Mailing List Spam This might be slightly off-topic but as the source of spam is probably a spammer getting emails from this list, I reported him and his service provider should cut off his/her ugly head. I got an email of the classic 419 scam from a "El Amir Assadallah" <rdjir001 at eircom.net>. This has just come if from the abuse department :- Dear Vandaman, Thank you for

Hi, FYI, I started receiving spam to the email address I use only for this mailing-list, about one week after I posted a couple messages onto it. So the nut mailing-list is definitely used by spammers for email addresses harvesting :-( -- Michel Bouissou <michel at bouissou.net> OpenPGP ID 0xEB04D09C

At 7:14 PM +0200 on 8/10/04, Soren Rathje wrote: >Gang, > >Do anyone have a clue on how they do this ?? > >"QOVIA FILES PATENTS FOR VOICE SPAM BLOCKING TECHNOLOGY" >http://www.qovia.com/company/news/06.28.2004_voip_spam_patent_app_final.htm > >"Qovia ready to take on VoIP spam" >http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2004/071204qovia.html > >Next thing

On 06/17/2018 08:52 AM, Michael Hennebry via CentOS wrote: > I'm petty sure I messed up attributions, so am deleting them. > >>> I believe this is a DMARC issue. Yahoo, among other places, has set >>> their dmarc records to p=reject: > >>> So, if your mail hosting provider enforces dmarc,(gmail does) and you >>> get mail from a list that doesn't

Hello, everyone. I've proven to myself, via throw-away addresses, that individuals and robots sift thru archives and mailing list subscription lists, gathering addresses to sell on CD's to spammers. No list is immune, especially if it or its archives are available over the web. I've been spammed within a very short while of my address appearing on a posted message. If you go to

On 16/03/2008, wine-users at winehq.org <wine-users at winehq.org> wrote: > The following message from "Dotan Cohen" <dotancohen at gmail.com> was not authorized for entry in the WineHQ Forums forum. > > Posts are not allowed to locked topics. > > From: > "Dotan Cohen" <dotancohen at gmail.com> > > To: > wine-users at winehq.org

Hm, my previous post on subject seem to have fallen in /dev/null (can't find it even in list archives, strange). Anyhow. While on the subject of spam control. I was playing lately with Domain Key (and also newer Domain Key Identified Mail) systems. It's currently primarly used by Yahoo and Google Mail (gmail). For example, all emails from gmail.com on this list have

On 06/17/2018 11:13 AM, Alice Wonder via CentOS wrote: > On 06/17/2018 09:11 AM, Alice Wonder via CentOS wrote: >> On 06/17/2018 08:52 AM, Michael Hennebry via CentOS wrote: >>> I'm petty sure I messed up attributions, so am deleting them. >>> >>>>> I believe this is a DMARC issue. Yahoo, among other places, has set >>>>> their dmarc

Been working on my anti-spam centos mailserver for a while now and thought I would share fail2ban's help. I installed fail2ban a few weeks back. It was tough to get it working properly but pretty much working now. Although it works fine for brute force, I thought I would run it pretty tough against spammers. I started with a regular mail server, my old one, that is horrendously pounded

On 9/06/20 2:56 pm, Jon LaBadie wrote: > I hit another limitation. My backup MX handler is a 3rd party who > will not use greylisting. Thus all the 1st timers I rejected just > delivered to my alternate MX address and were not blocked at all. Don't use a backup MX, they are a relic of the 90s when mail servers were often times not always online. a sending mail server will

.... ....some headers removed..... .... Received: from wine.codeweavers.com ([209.46.25.134]) by m1pismtp01-012.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net with ESMTP; 20 Jul 2011 00:24:17 -0700 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain ident=list) by wine.codeweavers.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <wine-users-bounces at winehq.org>) id 1QjR8Z-000558-Vt; Wed, 20 Jul

Hello, Thanks to some nice people on here and other forums I have pretty much finalized my whole mail system on centos 6.x. With all the checks, greylisting, dev/null of any 8+ spam level SA, I still get a few mails. It seems like everytime I enable a new protectant, the mail stops spamming for a few hours...then the spammers decide I am worthy of using better methods against me..and more

The centos at centos.org seems to be *uniquely* configured to hold messages with a (single) CC to self. ALL of the other mailing lists I am on have no problem with a CC to self. My mailer software is configured to CC to myself. This is *only* a problem with the CentOS list. Why is this? Yes, I know it is *normal* to configure Mailman to hold messages with a *long* CC list, since that is a common

Unfortunately evil spammers have managed to defeat all the anti-spam measures we've tried with the wiki. So it is with regret that we have had to disable new wiki account self-registration. We do still welcome contributions from anyone interested in adding wiki content. We just ask that you send a mail to the main devel mailing list (libvir-list@redhat.com) to request an account be created

Why are you replacing known spammers with these "banned" strings ? This forbids anti-spam filters & programs to do their jobs properly.

On 06/17/2018 09:11 AM, Alice Wonder via CentOS wrote: > On 06/17/2018 08:52 AM, Michael Hennebry via CentOS wrote: >> I'm petty sure I messed up attributions, so am deleting them. >> >>>> I believe this is a DMARC issue. Yahoo, among other places, has set >>>> their dmarc records to p=reject: >> >>>> So, if your mail hosting provider