similar to: no SD card with Wine

Hi. I have a spare off the shelf consumer PC and was thinking about loading Solaris on it for a development box since I use Studio @work and like it better than gcc. I was thinking maybe it isn''t so smart to use ZFS since it has only one drive. If ZFS detects something bad it might kernel panic and lose the whole system right? I realize UFS /might/ be ignorant of any corruption but it

I know, I probably gave a lot of people heart attacks just from that title. I'm not saying that I would actually try flashing my BIOS with WINE, I was just wondering, purely out of theoretical curiosity, if it's even possible to flash the BIOS by initiating an "exe" BIOS flasher from within WINE. I would suspect not, given that WINE "can't even" run Windows

Correct the "seg=" value(s) corresponding to the "reactos=" option for chain.c32. The correct segment parameter should be "seg=0x0F80", instead of the incorrect / failing ones "seg=0:0x8000:0x8100". References: https://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/boot/freeldr/notes.txt?revision=73859&view=markup&pathrev=73859#l24

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1558 Summary: Sftp client does not correctly process server response messages after write error Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.3p2 Platform: amd64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sftp

Hello syslinux mailing list users, I've initially filed a bug about my problem [1], but people from irc channel suggested to ask for help here. I have a PXE server based on syslinux 4.05 that distributes ReactOS to client machines over network. It has a pretty simple pxelinux.cfg/default, with the following contents (that were suggested by ReactOS wiki [2]): DEFAULT chain.c32 APPEND

(snip) > > It's a bit more complex. At the time of writing, the data was perfect. > > https://git.reactos.org/?p=reactos.git;a=blob;f=reactos/boot/freeldr/freeldr/include/arch/pc/x86common.h;hb=28e58e6d01892c1f2f0e1d323745e6463cb9e6c9 > dated 2011-06-14 > >

Hi Everyone, For those of you who don't know, Reactos (www.reactos.com) is an open source (GPL) attempt to write an NT compatible operating system. By the end of the year the kernel should be developed enough to support a GUI. My first thought was to grab the xfree86 source code and use the bitmaps, etc. from there and program my own USER32.DLL. However, if WINE can be altered to run on

> On 2014-12-07, at 14:57, jay at m5.chicago.il.us wrote: > > >> >> If you want a stand alone Wine, you are looking at React OS, >> which is awful .... >> > > I have noticed that also. Does anyone here know anything about the > ReactOS project? Is it ever going to be a respectable free non-Unix > operating system, like Haiku or Plan 9? Yes. To

On 09/08/2017 01:31 PM, hw wrote: > Mark Haney wrote: > > I/O is not heavy in that sense, that?s why I said that?s not the > application. > There is I/O which, as tests have shown, benefits greatly from low > latency, which > is where the idea to use SSDs for the relevant data has arisen from.? > This I/O > only involves a small amount of data and is not sustained

Fwiw, I think a ReactOS port would be very useful to both projects. One thing I think xen could do with (if it isn''t there already) is some sort of virtual framebuffer like with disk and network. Dom0 could provide the backend of the virtual framebuffer (on virtual consoles or inside X windows or whatever), and the other domains could make use of the exported framebuffers. It

Dear Daniel, The thirty-party PCIe card is based on the Xilinx’ FPGA which is off the shelf, the main features are as follows: 1) x8 Gen3, 8Gb/s per lane/direction 2) MSI and legacy interrupt support 3) Scatter-gather packet DMA engine provide by Northwest Logic We hope multiple Linux Containers to access the PCIe card in time division mode, for example, during slot 1, lxc1 read/write the PCIe

I can't get reactos.org to load on my XP system. any ideas why? I even tried using another 2 systems that access the web from this system's connection I'd love to see that project [Crying or Very sad]

http://www.reactos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5240 It is based on WINE and ReactOS . The project is sponsored by a chinese company.

Hi, Im posting here the next doubt: Yesterday a korean company has released a new OS which is compatible with MS Windows Apps. As they state, they are a propietary OS, and i cant see any GPL code or SVN repository.Of course my lack of Korean can help to not find the open source code,but the little im able to read seems they arent going to release any source code. I know that is quite difficult

After adding /reactos as windows systemroot, virt-inspector identified OS as windows with product name ReactOS. Fixes RHBZ#709326. Related bug RHBZ#709327 seems to be already fixed in ReactOS 0.4. Maros Zatko (1): inspector: add /reactos as systemroot src/inspect-fs-windows.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 1.9.3

I was taught in kitty school that running a ntp server in a vm was a bad idea. Is that still the case?

I got through with reactos.org using proxy.org! however, silly ISP won't offer support still... I'm going to give them a piece of mind soon... anyway back on topic now. I can finally find this thingy...

Why don't you make a Wine OS I know ReactOS exist but it's useless than Wine (No web & No Selector for compatibility Windows OS).

i see i can download wine files for windows, but how i install wine on windows 7 64 bit? i want to run a 16 bit windows game on windows 7 64 bit. on linux + wine it is ok, but how to do on windows? sadly reactos does not support 16 bit windows programs. why not?

jeffz wrote: > > rolandixor wrote: > > I can't get reactos.org to load on my XP system. > > > This is the wrong place to ask. This is the Wine Users forum. Try the ReactOS website. I can't use it! can't you understand? it won't load? Since wine and reactos are so closely related, and this IS a forum, can't someone offer at least a byte of