similar to: USB support

Hi list, I''m totally new at xen and apologize for my ignorance. What I''m trying to do is the following: I''ve got a laptop with core 2 duo cpu. Dom0: Fedora Core 6. Dom1: WinXP HVM I want to give the Dom1 full access to the wifi card, and the possibility to use USB pen drive. So I''ve hidden the pci address (according to lspci output) in the kernel''s

I am having some problems with uploading printer drivers. I follow the procedures as outlined in both TOSHARG and Samba-3 by Example, and I use the Add Printer Drivers Wizard to upload the drivers. It looks OK, and the drivers make into the \\server\print$\W32X86\3 directory. But when I click okay, I get "Printer settings could not be saved. Access is denied." This happens when

Hi all, I have a box, until warranty (I may not open it) and 2 external USB hard drives. My perfect solution is to open the box, plug the drives on the SATA slots, and use them. Unfortunately, I'll have to fall back to the cheap solution: I would like to use each external drive as physical volume (PV) and then "join" them as a VG in order to use a LVM composed by internal

I need a softphone - for usb phone devices - that I can alter (insert logo, menu, etc). Does somebody know such one? []s -- Abra?os Luis Claudio Mobile + 55 21 9215 2888 Mobile +55 15 9141 8402 Office +55 15 2102 5859 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070329/b8593cb1/attachment.htm

Here's a flipside of this subject: what is the absolute cheapest Linux device that can be connected to a PC's USB port? That has just enough power for a minimal Asterisk server running on it. The Asterisk just maintains a CDR database on its Flash memory, which it periodically submits over the PC's network connection with an HTTP hit on a remote full-service Asterisk server? No call

Hi David, So I've began doing some implementation on the outlining portion of the code. Currently, I got the partial inliner to outline cold regions (single entry, single exit) of the code, based solely on the existence of ProfileSummaryInfo (ie. profiling data). However, I have some concerns on how this will co-exist with the existing code that peels early returns. The control flow looks

Hi, I have a windows app that allows an old dos program that will only print to LPT, to redirect to a USB printer. I was able to use this in native windows. But Wine does not seem to be able to launch a dos box like windows could. The program is at: http://www.dos2usb.com/download.htm Unless there is some other way to redirect an LPT port? Thanks Bob

Hi, How do i convert from Maildir to dbox using the convert plugin? My users reside in /home/user/Maildir. In the dovecot.conf file i've set up convert_mail = dbox:%h but I am not sure about the syntax. Im getting the error: Couldn't create mailbox directory INBOX Mailbox conversion failed, exiting Thanks -- Kjartan

Hi David, The only reason I can see to use the 'pattern matching' part as a fall-back is in case we cannot inline the (what I'm assuming would be) a much bigger hot-path-only cloned function for whatever reason. What I'm assuming here is that after cold-region outlining, we may still have a large portion of the original function body to attempt to inline, whereas the pattern

I second the fact that a way to outline specific function regions independently of the partial inliner sound very useful. I am not sure however if we would want a mode within the partialInliner or something completely independent. As a general question, does anybody has a clear idea of what are the constraints on the region CodeExtractor is currently able to handle ? Going through the code, it

Hi, On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > The way I interpret Quentin's statement is something like: > > - Inlining turns an interprocedural problem into an intraprocedural problem > - Outlining turns an intraprocedural problem into an interprocedural problem > > Insofar as our intraprocedural analyses and transformations are

Hi Andrew, Thanks for this great work and presentation, I've also a huge interest in code size reduction. I already looked at the first IR Outliner proposal, and I really like your more general approach. I wanted to look at the impact on ARM targets, and managed to apply your patchset up to D87311 (the remaining ones which are related to call instructions and GEP need to be reworked to be

Hi, I would like to know which the best way to replicate Sysvol between my DC Samba 4 is with Rsync/Osync, as per the article below? https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bidirectional_Rsync/osync_based_SysVol_replication_workaround I have 3 Samba 4 DC. Regards, M?rcio Bacci

In general I would love to see an outliner at the IR level also. But rather than a comparison vs. the machine outliner I would like to learn more about how the core data structures between the outliners will be shared. In particular for matching/pruning it seems to be a reasonable approach. A few more remarks/questions are below also. Thanks Gerolf > On Sep 5, 2017, at 4:16 PM, River Riddle

Yes I agree with David, I don't think we can draw analogy between lambda and outlined routines. Seb From: David Blaikie [mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 5:51 PM To: Hal Finkel Cc: llvmdev; sebastien deldon (PGI); Eric Christopher Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Debug information for outlined routine > Given that LLVM has no current support for outlining I don't

Hi, I have followed the guidelines outlined in the article: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory#Built-in_User_.26_Group_ID_Mappings . I had a doubt: When I ran the tdbbackup -s .bak command idmap.ldb which is 2MB generated a 720k-sized idmap.ldb.bak file. I have stopped the samba service on CD 2, replaced the idmap.ldb file with idmap.ldb.bak,

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 4:14 PM, River Riddle via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hey Graham, > I worked on pretty much this exact thing last year. I did something > similar to what you described, I traversed the CFG and built potentially > profitable regions from any given valid start node. At that point there > were several road blocks that prevented it

Hi, Johannes, Thanks for working on this. This seems like a good approach which nicely extends the set of capabilities we have now. One additional comment, as I agree with everything in your rationale, except this: > - Reconstructing information from the pattern of instructions that feed > into the `llvm.assume` is also not optimal, especially since we do > not need to

Hello, I'd like to upstream our work over the time which the community would benefit from. This is a part of effort toward minimizing code size presented in here <https://llvm.org/devmtg/2020-02-23/slides/Kyungwoo-GlobalMachineOutlinerForThinLTO.pdf>. In particular, this RFC is about optimizing prolog and epilog for size. *Homogeneous Prolog and Epilog for Size Optimization, D76570

On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 at 16:48, Andrew Litteken <andrew.litteken at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Yvan, > > Glad to hear you’re interested! I’m not sure which ordering you’re looking at the patches, but a cost model was not added to the outliner until D87299. So, if that hasn’t been added I would expect some pretty big code increases since it just outlines whatever similarity it finds