similar to: Re: ntdll.dll.so: invalid ELF header

dimesio wrote: > > Blowbrown4 wrote: > > Good day, i've got a problem with antivir, probably someone knows: > > error (211): program file of AntiVir has been modified". > > I wonder if prelink is affecting it? > > What does this have to do with Wine? That is what I don`t get here also [Rolling Eyes]

Hi, I am using Debian GNU/Linux Lenny with kernel verison 2.6.26-2-amd64 (x86_64) and want to compile wine 1.1.38 form the source Tarball. After successful compilation and installation through "make install", I get the following error when trying to run wine (e.g. when trying to run winecfg or any other application). wine: failed to initialize: /usr/local/lib/wine/ntdll.dll.so:

ysa wrote: > I read on http://wiki.winehq.com/Prelink that prelink is just used to modify the base address and does not have to be active at run time. > > By looking at the source code of winegcc and setting the -v (verbose) option, I found out that prelink is called the following way after ntdll.dll.so has been compiled by gcc: > > Code: > > /usr/sbin/prelink --reloc-only

This is a complicated problem. Fortunately, solution is posted here.

-- This e-mail was scanned with a private, non-commercial version of AntiVir MailGate. See http://www.antivir.de for details. -- This e-mail was scanned with a private, non-commercial version of AntiVir MailGate. See http://www.antivir.de for details. -------------- next part -------------- Skipped content of type multipart/signed

I have a number of CentOS6 machines, and on one of them, the daily prelink cron job aborts. Any ideas what to look for? /etc/cron.daily/prelink: /etc/cron.daily/prelink: line 47: 9381 Aborted (core dumped) /usr/sbin/prelink -av $PRELINK_OPTS >> /var/log/prelink/prelink.log 2>&1 I'm unfamiliar with prelink, so I'm not sure what to look for in the logs.

Hi All, Does anyone knows what doest this output means? [root@serverxen ~]# xm list Name                                      ID Mem(MiB) VCPUs State   Time(s) Domain-0                                   0     3202     8 r-----   5220.1 vm1                                  3     4095     2 -b----   3529.2 vm2                                  5     8191     4 -b----    399.0 [root@serverxen ~]# xm

Can anybody explain to me what's going on here? This is a CentOS 4 i386 system. [root at edison ~]# rm -f /etc/prelink.cache [root at edison ~]# /etc/cron.daily/prelink [root at edison ~]# rpm -qf /usr/bin/sqlite3 sqlite-3.3.6-2 [root at edison ~]# rpm --verify sqlite prelink: /usr/bin/sqlite3: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking S.?.....

On Wed, August 30, 2017 10:43 am, Tony Schreiner wrote: > This has come up for me on the most recent upgrade, add the line > > HASH_CMD=sha1sum > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > >> Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting warnings from >> rkhunterWarning: Checking for prerequisites [ Warning

Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting warnings from rkhunterWarning: Checking for prerequisites [ Warning ] All file hash checks will be skipped because: This system uses prelinking, but the hash function command does not look like SHA1 or MD5. Now, googling, I find people saying to rm /etc/prelink.cache, then run rkhunter --propupd. Works. And then,

Hi, I just tried the below with the current version 1.0 RC15 (from the dovecot website) and I still got the Problem: telnet gives me the following output: -----8<-----8<-----8<-----SNIP-----8<-----8<-----8<----- +OK dovecot ready.u-ERR invalid command u s-ERR invalid command s e-ERR invalid command e r-ERR invalid command r -ERR invalid command u-ERR invalid command u s-ERR

in my prior message, that should be in rkhunter.conf On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Tony Schreiner <anthony.schreiner at bc.edu> wrote: > This has come up for me on the most recent upgrade, add the line > > HASH_CMD=sha1sum > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > >> Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting

Hi, I just tried the below with the current version 1.0 RC15 and I still got the Problem: telnet gives me the following output: -----8<-----8<-----8<-----SNIP-----8<-----8<-----8<----- +OK dovecot ready.u-ERR invalid command u s-ERR invalid command s e-ERR invalid command e r-ERR invalid command r -ERR invalid command u-ERR invalid command u s-ERR invalid command s e-ERR

So, what does this do? # cat /etc/prelink.conf.d/skype.conf -b /usr/bin/skype -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax:

I have a large installer program (~400MB) that fails to run under wine (20050310). It gives me the following: err:virtual:map_image Image was mapped at 0x60640000: standard load address for a Win32 program (0x00400000) not available err:virtual:map_image Do you have exec-shield or prelink active? wine: could not load L"C:\\WebPACK_71_fcfull_i.exe" as Win32 binary The thing is that I

The above discussion of prelink gave me pause for thought... I have a "suite" of programs that I install in their own directory, along with their datafiles, under /opt. Would it be a good idea to add that directory to /etc/prelink.conf? What could go wrong? -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com

Hi, is it possible, that the current development version for Windows ( http://cran.at.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/R-2.13.0dev-win.exe) is infected by a trojan/virus. My antivir-program (www.avira.com) seems to find a trojan in open.exe at bin\i386. Best regards, Andreas [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

The current /lib/tls support in Xen/Linux through rewriting faulting instructions seems to work well, but for one rather nasty issue. If you are running with /lib/tls on a system that also uses prelinking (you can check this by looking for e.g., /etc/cron.daily/prelink) then you''re /lib/tls libraries will get corrupted! The problem is that the prelinking changes cause some of the binary

Hi People, I have just started building my own RPMS on both Fedora and CentOS and generally things have gone well. Currently I am trying to create RPMS for some commercial software that we have purchased. Step 1 was install the software using its JAVA Based installer ensuring that all files were installed into a particular directory in /usr/local. Step 2 was create a tar file of the

Hi, I know I shouldn't ask stuff like this when using dovecot-0.99.11-4.EL4 (CentOS-4.4), but why I'm asking this is whether it's worth to switch from rpm based upstream dovecot to a self compiled one or not and thus I think you wouldn't kill me presenting you this question. o:-) I've got a problem with dovecot regarding a pop3 proxy issue. When I configure my dovecot server