similar to: Having troubles with Stars!

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 40000 matches similar to: "Having troubles with Stars!"

2006 Aug 13
2
Star Trek Armada 2
I tried to install and play Star Trek Armada 2 (DirectX 8.0a) with Wine 0.9.19. No Winetools or so were used. Just plain wine. Installation worked fine. I just rejected to install DirectX 8.0a. Starting was without sound, but with movie sequences. Then it stopped. Any suggestions what to do? Here the reports: installation: err:ole:CoGetClassObject class
2001 Mar 04
1
Wine, Stars!, and the Battle VCR
I've got a situation where the current version of Wine is crashing when a very repeatable action occurs. What command line parameter should I add to create a log for the developers to look at and figure out what's going on? Regards, Mark Norton
2010 Feb 08
2
GTA San Andreas on Mac-PLEASE READ!
I am trying to run my modified no-cd v.1.0 GTA San Andreas game on my aluminum unibody Intel processor (Nvidia gpu) mac using Wine Bottle. I got it to work once and then, after adding my saved game files to the Documents folder, I couldn't get it to run again. It just kept loading the blue virtual desktop and then crashing!!! I cant seem to pull myself away from this problem and i have been
2007 Jul 26
1
Lohan the observable
Sorry, that name is a misnomer. However, I was excited to find that Ruby has a built in Observable module and I''m pretty bored, so I apologize in advance.... require ''observer'' # one who is observed class Celebrity include Observable attr_accessor :name attr_reader :is def is=(val) @is = val changed notify_observers(self) end end # one who
2007 Mar 07
1
Failure to run mcsamp() in package arm
Dear r-helpers, I can run the examples on the mcsamp help page. For example: **************************************** > M1 <- lmer (y1 ~ x + (1|group)) > (M1.sim <- mcsamp (M1)) fit using lmer, 3 chains, each with 1000 iterations (first 500 discarded) n.sims = 1500 iterations saved mean sd 2.5% 25% 50% 75% 97.5% Rhat n.eff beta.(Intercept)
2006 Mar 30
3
Winbind and email server
Folks, Sincere apologies for asking this again, but I'm just not getting this to work, and must be missing something here: My company's network is based around a Windows 2003 server AD, with several RHEL AS 3 boxes connected to it via samba (3.0.21c-1). ?This scheme works very well. ?I've set up, and have successfully been using a sendmail-based email system, too. My issue is
2006 Feb 07
2
SAMBA and X509 certs ?
Hello everybody, I'll try to find out some info about Samba and a way to put x509 authenticate method but i don't find anything clear about it. I found in the how-to v3 some stuff about authenticate PAM module to use with samba but I don't know if I look in the right direction. I have a samba server running for a lots of time based on smbpass DB. We plan to use our PKI certs to
2011 Apr 23
1
Phantasy Star Universe Ambition of Illuminus install issue
Hello everybody, I'm actually very new to the forums, but I've used Wine for a very long time, long enough to even see some of my games start working more and more as the project has developed. Recently, however, I decided to try out one of my old favorites, Phantasy Star...and the support is actually pretty good! So I went about through the process of installing. Unfortunately, my
2003 Aug 07
1
graph for selected lines in stars()
Dear listers, The following command (derived from the example in the ?stars help page) works : data(mtcars) stars(mtcars[, 1:7]) But the following gives an error: stars(mtcars[1, 1:7]) Error in s.y[i, ] : incorrect number of dimensions I was expecting to have the star graph for the first line (Mazda Rx4) The following give an incorrect graph for the first two cars : stars(mtcars[1:2, 1:7])
2009 Jun 06
1
stars (as fourfold plots) in plot (symbols don't work)
Hi! I have a dataset with three columns -the first two refer to x and y coordinates, the last one are odds ratios. I'd like to plot the data with x and y coordinates and the odds ratio shown as a fourfold plot, which I prefer to do using the stars function. Unfortunately the stars option in symbols is not as cool as the stars function on its own, and now i can't figure out how to do it!
2009 Jun 11
1
Help on drawing stars and radars in R (update)
Hi I don't know if you can help. I am a 2nd year Bsc Cosmetic Science student and in R I need some help in drawing stars. The problem that I have is I want to recreate a radar diagram similar to the one in excel. I have put in these commands in a script window: stars(shampoo1[, 1:6], locations = c(0,0), radius = TRUE, key.loc=c(0,0), main = "Ranked Results for the Sensory
2019 Mar 28
0
default for 'signif.stars'
Hi Martin, I take your point - but I'd argue that significance stars are a clumsy solution to the very real problem that you outline, and their inclusion as a default sends a signal about their appropriateness that I would prefer R not to endorse. My preference (to the extent that it matters) would be to see the significance stars be an option but not a default one, and the addition of
2009 Jun 10
0
Help on drawing stars and radars in R
Hi I don't know if you can help. I am a 2nd year Bsc Cosmetic Science student and in R I need some help in drawing stars. The problem that I have is I want to recreate a radar diagram similar to the one in excel. I have put in these commands in a script window: stars(shampoo1[, 1:6], locations = c(0,0), radius = TRUE, key.loc=c(0,0), main = "Ranked Results for the Sensory
2006 Nov 27
1
freebsd-security Digest, Vol 187, Issue 4
> [It's just a panic] > I was so transfixed on Josh stating that the attacker could as well > just mount a filesystem with suid root binaries and how that would be > more useful than a buffer overflow in the filesystem driver. I totally > missed the fact that we were talking about two bugs where the kernel > deliberately called panic() ;). > > So in this case I'd
2019 Mar 27
1
default for 'signif.stars'
Dear R-Devel, As I am sure many of you know, a special issue of The American Statistician just came out, and its theme is the [mis]use of P values and the many common ways in which they are abused. The lead editorial in that issue mentions the 2014 ASA guidelines on P values, and goes one step further, by now recommending that the words "statistically significant" and related simplistic
2001 Dec 27
1
scale in stars() is not as documented (PR#1230)
R 1.4.0 ?stars has scale: logical flag: if `TRUE', the columns of the data matrix are scaled independently so that the maximum value in each column is 1 and the minimum is 0. If `FALSE', the presumption is that the data have been scaled by some other algorithm to the range [0,1]. but the code has if (scale) { x <- sweep(x, 2,
2009 May 04
1
whish stars.Rd
Dear Rdev, in R 2.9.0 the doc of function stars() does not state that it returns invisibly the location of atomic graphs. This is a valuable information as it may help to set a value for the key.loc parameter of this function. My whish is just that the "value" section in stars.Rd should be documented. Best, Pr. Jean R. Lobry BTW, the URL:,
2011 Jan 12
1
Basic Stars Plot - help ..
Hi there Rers I am trying a very basic stars plot: x<-matrix(c(1,4,3,1.1,2,3,4,3,1,1,5,2), ncol = 3, byrow = TRUE, >> dimnames=list(c("a","b","c","d"),c("x","y","z"))) > > stars(x, draw.segments = TRUE, radius=TRUE) > > Can anyone explain what I am seeing there - EACH of my plots should have 3 coloured
2019 Mar 28
1
default for 'signif.stars'
I read through the editorial. This is the one of the most mega-ultra-super-biased articles I've ever read. e.g. The authors encourage Baysian methods, and literally encourage subjective approaches. However, there's only one reference to robust methods and one reference to nonparametric methods, both of which are labelled as purely exploratory methods, which I regard as extremely
2019 Mar 28
0
default for 'signif.stars'
Dear all, I agree with both Russ and Terry that the significance stars option should default to FALSE. Here's what Sandy Weisberg and I say about significance starts in the current edition of the R Companion to Applied Regression: 'If you find the ?statistical-significance? asterisks that R prints to the right of the p-values annoying, as we do, you can suppress them, as we will in the