Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "Multiuser database application / file locks"
2018 Nov 22
5
Index Corruption xBase database
Hello,
I've been working with a xBase database (similar to dBase) in a multiuser
application. There are like 40 users working on the database on the same
time reading and like 10 writing information.
Sometimes the CDX files (Index Files) get corrupted and is it's necessary
to pack the tables (rebuild the indexes).
I have notice using the smbstatus -B command the following
Pid
2018 Nov 22
1
Index Corruption xBase database
from the man page. I've never tried veto oplocks. But it looks like
something that might be useful...
> veto oplock files (S)
>
> This parameter is only valid when the oplocks parameter is turned
> on for a share. It allows the Samba administrator to selectively
> turn off the granting of oplocks on selected files that match a
>
2018 Nov 22
0
Index Corruption xBase database
from smbstatus man page:
-B|--byterange
causes smbstatus to include byte range locks.
the fact is that 4 different connections are opening the same byte
range in 'MOVCTA.cdx'
That's about all that I can get from your command result dump.
On 2018-11-22 9:21 a.m., Jose Concha wrote:
> Using oplocks = no makes the communication extremely slow. For testing
>
2006 May 09
3
poor performance - multiuser fileserver database (ms-access)
I have a file server running with Samba over Debian Sarge 3.1 R1. This
File server store MDB and XLS files. Could anybody give me an optimal
setup for my samba server (smb.conf). Actually, the performance is very
poor.
[global]
workgroup = REVLON
netbios name = FILE_SRV
security = user
encrypt passwords = yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
unix password sync = yes
socket options =
1999 Sep 16
6
DBase File locking issues (PR#20441)
Jim@Morris.net wrote:
> I have finally tracked down the reason I am experiencing problems with
> DBase files on Samba file servers - initially Redhat 6, and now on
> Caldera OpenLinux 2.2 as well.
Great debugging work !
> The DOS client code uses a DBase library called CodeBase to access the
> DBase files. When a record is appended to a file, the underlying C
> code does the
2010 Sep 20
3
Can't figure out how to put wineprefixes on an NTFS drive
Hi,
I'm still a bit new to Linux and Wine, so please bear with me if this is a stupid question.
I've been putting all my windows applications in their own wineprefixes, and now I thought I'd put some of them in my data partition, because there's always lots of free space there and many of my games take a lot of space.
But when I try to create a new wineprefix on my data
2018 Nov 22
0
Index Corruption xBase database
Are the shares set to oplocks = no ? That sometimes has a role in
database corruption.
On 2018-11-22 6:31 a.m., Jose Concha via samba wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been working with a xBase database (similar to dBase) in a multiuser
> application. There are like 40 users working on the database on the same
> time reading and like 10 writing information.
>
> Sometimes the
2018 Nov 22
0
Index Corruption xBase database
Thanks for the tip. Is veto oplocks different to oplocks = no?
Just now I run into an error, but this time I have this log:
../lib/util/util.c:401(fcntl_lock)
fcntl_lock: fcntl lock gave errno 11 (resource temporally unavailable)
fcntl_lock: lock failed at offset 2147483646 count 1 op 37 type 1 (resource
temporally unavailable)
Does this give you any clue of how the problem can be solved?
The
1999 Sep 17
0
(Un)Locking shared DOS application
Hi,
for some time now I'm trying to create the best environment/solve a
sharing conflict around a DOS application (Clippered dBase I suscpect)
that one of our clients is using and distributing over about 20 Sun
450's on a shared service 'servershare'.
On every Sun there are multiple Windows 95 clients connected to diverse
shares amongst which this 'servershare'.
On this
2007 Jan 25
1
Running Windows Database Applications
As it seems that we will be a year or so away from database application
programs for linux like there are for windows (Foxpro, Paradox, dBASE,
Access, Visual Basic, etc.), I am attempting to use windows as a development
system (on a separate computer) and they copying the application to a linux
computer (suse 9.3 to 10.1) to see if it will run under wine.
It seems that the testing that has
2009 Apr 10
6
ActiveX error when running an application(VB 6 based)
I am trying to run a home made Visual Basic 6 application on SUSE Linux
Desktop 10, using "wine-1.1.18-2.1"
Installation of VB 6 Application went smooth, and creates the directory
under "/root/.wine/drive_c/Program\ Files/PrjPatientInfo".
I then did the following
# cd /root/.wine/drive_c/Program\ Files
# cd PrjPatientInfo
# wine cmd
C:\Program Files\PrjPatientInfo>
2011 Oct 29
7
Run more than one application in wine simultaneously
Is it possible? If so, can you explain to a newbie (me) precisely how it is done?
Don't take any shortcuts with your explanations, please: I'm a bona fida idiot
2005 Apr 15
0
Multi-user databases (DOS application) in WIndows XP and Windows 2k file locking problem
Hello all!
I discover a strange thing.
We use and develop DOS financial accounting application, written on Xbase
(formerly known as Clipper). This application agressively uses of file
sharing and locking (byte-range and all possible for DOS combinations),
creates and uses huge amount of index (NTX) and Dbase III (DBF) files on
network shared resource. Network clients are Windows 98se,
2008 Mar 07
9
question about WINEPREFIX
I wanted to ask to the wine experts something about WINEPREFIX or the crossover bottles...
how does the concept of "bottles" compares/differs with the concept of application virtualization (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_Virtualization) used by VMware's Thinstall (http://www.thinstall.com/products/virtualization_suite.php) (aside for the .exe container*) and
2011 Dec 02
7
Clean enviroments in Wine
I read somewhere that in order for a program to work properly in Wine it should be installed in a clean enviroment, something along the lines of one software conflicting with anothers drivers/runtime/apps/etc. Is this true? Does this mean that I can only have one program installed with Wine at a time?
Can one not create several 'fresh enviroments'?
1999 Sep 14
2
DBase File locking issues
Hi All,
I am experiencing issues with the use of DBase files on a Samba 2.0.5a
share, that appear to be due to locking problems. Basically, I have
test programs for both DOS and Win32 that does nothing but append
records to a DBase database (DBF/MDX files). If more than one client
PC is appending to this file, data loss occurs. I get random data
loss, with records lost, and index file
2009 Jul 23
5
wine: /intended/PREFIXdirectory/not owned by you
I am attempting to create a folder for my wineprefixes on my external hard disk. The plan is to symlink to that location from inside my user folder (ie. ~/.wine/PREFIXES -> $iomega/.wineprefixes)
For reference:
$iomega=/media/Iomega_HDD
This is a 400GB external drive with a single NTFS partition.
The plan is to create folders for all my WINEPREFIXes at $iomega/.wineprefixes
(Example:
2011 Jul 02
2
Windows program installation with Wine
Apologies for what is probably a silly question !
If one installs a Windows program in Linux with Wine which requires things like Winetricks to install some Windows stuff, is the whole installation within the .Wine folder ?
I assume that when installing Windows programs (Including anything else that is necessary, eg. from Winetricks) then everything is indeed within .Wine with no changes at all
2010 Nov 27
5
Winetricks fails to install many programs.
Hi.
I'm trying to make a windows environment to ensure most programs work. So I installed many things using wine tricks, however these are giving issues, but I think are important -
directplay dotnet11 dotnet20 dotnet20sp2 dotnet30 dsound gfw msxml3 msxml4 msxml6 vc2005express vc2005expresssp1 vcrun2003 vcrun2005 vcrun2008 vcrun2010 vcrun6 vcrun6sp6 vjrun20 wininet wme9 xact xvid
Lets
2009 Aug 20
5
protecting multiuser systems from bruteforce ssh attacks
Hello,
What is the best way to protect multiuser systems from brute force
attacks? I am setting up a relatively loose DenyHosts policy, but I
like the idea of locking an account for a time if too many attempts
are made, but to balance this with keeping the user from making a
helpdesk call.
What are some policies/techniques that have worked for this list with
minimal hassle?
Thanks!
-Eugene