similar to: how to install wine for centos 5 32 bit

Hi, I am the next scenario: ############################################################################# SERVER SIDE? (64 bit architecture) ?############################################################################# Two Storage Machines with: HARDWARE DELL PE2900 III Intel Quad Core Xeon E5420 2,5Ghz, 2x6Mb cache, Bus 1333FSB RAM 4 GB FB 667Mhz (2x2Gb) 8 HDD 1 TB, Near Line SAS 3,5"

Hi all, I try to build xen 4.2( revision number: 25161) on Ubuntu 11.10_amd64, Mac pro. After running ./configure and make. I got the following fatal error: *libxlu_cfg_y.y:22:26: fatal error: libxlu_cfg_l.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated.* So the original libxlu_cfg_l.h is deleted when making, and should be regenerated but it is not. I find the path of flex and bison is not

Hi all, At the moment, LLVM includes the .l, .y sources that are compiled by flex and biston via make. This is fine for most unix developers. For windows developers, it's a bit more of a pain to download flex/bison, but is still a one-time thing. However, anyone releasing an llvm frontend will require their users to have flex/bison. Most (but not all) unix boxes have them, but almost no

Thanks for your comment. I also tried for LLVM 2.2 but got the same compilation errors on VS2005. (I didn't modify anything before the compilation) I just wonder if I need bison and flex even just in the case of compiling them on VS2005 without changing anything because the LLVM doc says "If you plan to modify any .y or .l files, you will need to have bison and/or flex installed where

I have flex and bison from Cygwin installed: $ flex --version flex version 2.5.4 $ bison --version bison (GNU Bison) 2.3 Written by Robert Corbett and Richard Stallman. Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Should that work,

I have always built it with flex and bison installed, though I believe Chris removed our last dependence on flex a little while back, so you may not need that. I'm using bison 2.1 which I got from the getgnuwin32 folks. I imagine that if you have cygwin or the like, you probably already have everything. You will need to have the executables in your path. I build with VisualStudio 2k5

Hi, (I seem to be having some trouble getting messages to post on the list so I may be duplicating an earlier post. Apologies if this is the case.) I am compiling CVS tip Asterisk on a fresh CentOS 3.4 install. I got this warning: make ast_expr.a make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/asterisk' bison -v -d --name-prefix=ast_yy ast_expr.y -o ast_expr.c

On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Alexander Friedman wrote: > Hi all, > have flex/bison. Most (but not all) unix boxes have them, but almost > no windows boxes have them. This requires either > > 1) Forcing the user to dowload flex/bison (bad) > 2) Distributing flex/bison with the front-end (not as bad, but a pain) > > 3) or, and this seems like a simple fix, just distribute the output

On 6/29/05, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Alexander Friedman wrote: > > Hi all, > > have flex/bison. Most (but not all) unix boxes have them, but almost > > no windows boxes have them. This requires either > > > > 1) Forcing the user to dowload flex/bison (bad) > > 2) Distributing flex/bison with the front-end (not as

>I have flex and bison from Cygwin installed: WinGNU32 Flex and Bison are the ones to use with LLVM and Visual Studio. http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/ The LLVM Visual Studio .sln file is for Visual Studio 2003 so will require conversion and some minor modification. Aaron > Should that work, assuming they're on the PATH? When I ran the build from > inside VS, I get some

Hi,   The unstable repository seems to be quite unstable even building the image... !! I see:   make[4]: Entering directory `/foo/xen-unstable.hg/tools/libxl'' gcc -O1 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -m64 -g -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-unused-value -Wdeclaration-after-statement  -D__XEN_TOOLS__ -MMD -MF .xl.o.d  -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE

Hi,   The unstable repository seems to be quite unstable even building the image... !! I see:   make[4]: Entering directory `/foo/xen-unstable.hg/tools/libxl'' gcc -O1 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -m64 -g -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-unused-value -Wdeclaration-after-statement  -D__XEN_TOOLS__ -MMD -MF .xl.o.d  -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE

This patchs adds better support for both Flex and Bison, which might be needed to compile libxl. Now configure script sets BISON and FLEX Makefile vars if bison and flex are found, but doesn''t complain if they are not found. Also, added some Makefile soccery to print a nice error message if Bison or Flex are needed but not found. Please run autogen after applying this patch.

NSD 4.10.0rc1 is available: https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.10.0rc1.tar.gz sha256 ad476e82eee5bdabc985e071cabe6a68263dd02eac6278ce2f81798b8c08f19f pgp https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.10.0rc1.tar.gz.asc Version 4.10.0 integrates simdzone and drops the Flex+Bison zone parser. NSD used a Flex+Bison based zone parser since version 1.4.0. The parser served NSD well, but zones have

Asterisk has this error on compile: flex ast_expr2.fl "ast_expr2.fl", line 50: unrecognized %option: reentrant "ast_expr2.fl", line 51: unrecognized %option: bison-bridge "ast_expr2.fl", line 52: unrecognized %option: bison-locations make: *** [ast_expr2f.c] Error 1 2.6.12-1.1447_FC4smp #1 SMP bison (GNU Bison) 2.0 Written by Robert Corbett and Richard Stallman.

Hi: I have just started to use llvm and confronted with a problem: when I want to transform something very simple for name.ll to name.bc with llvm-as name.ll, some errors occured: error: parse error, expecting `GLOBAL' or `CONSTANT' while reading token: 'target' btw, the name.ll file is as follows: ; ModuleID = 'tst.bc' target datalayout =

?Hi, I have the next scenario: ############################################################################# SERVER SIDE? (64 bit architecture) ?############################################################################# Two Storage Machines with: HARDWARE DELL PE2900 III Intel Quad Core Xeon E5420 2,5Ghz, 2x6Mb cache, Bus 1333FSB RAM 4 GB FB 667Mhz (2x2Gb) 8 HDD 1 TB,

Hi all Reference: http://support.zresearch.com/community/documentation/index.php/Gluster_3.1:_Installing_GlusterFS_on_OpenSolaris I have found this guide to be too brief/terse, and have endeavoured to improve it via more of a recipie/howto approach - and possibly misunderstood the intent of the brief directions in the process. Please advise if there are any errors? Once the procedure is

By the way, somebody (I think it was Chuck, but I don't remember for certain) was asking for the BuildLog.htm from building the llvm.sln file under VS 2005 SP1 for diagnostic purposes; right now the SLN is configured to produce a new BuildLog for each and every one of the projects inside the solution. I don't know who's responsible for this guy, but that's probably not the best way

I know I compiled AEL2 into 1.2 before, considering I just copied my source from one server to another, yet I can't seem to figure out why I'm getting this error. Anyone have any ideas? make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/asterisk-svn/asterisk/pbx' flex argdesc.l "argdesc.l", line 19: unrecognized %option: reentrant "argdesc.l", line 20: unrecognized