similar to: Can I use Peerblock with Wine, if yes how?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I found a problem with my tcstart script. First I was running system TC enabled for testing and then to stop all TC I changed TC_ENABLED=No. But I started to wonder why shorewall restart did _not_ clear TC rules after TC was disabled? So I checked firewall and found out that if TC_ENABLED=No TC_CLEAR is disabled automatically. Question is: should

Hello, When i restart the firewall when i put the HIGH_ROUTE_MARKS=Yes i can''t restart it, i receive the following message in the logs: 18:17:35 Compiling /etc/shorewall/providers ... ERROR: Invalid Mark Value (1) with HIGH_ROUTE_MARKS=Yes : /etc/shorewall/providers (line 13) My files have: tcrules: empty Providers:New 1 1 main eth0 192.168.1.1

Since you''ve started signing your email, Tom, my machine can''t verify your sig. Where are you publishing your key? -- John Andersen - NORCOM http://www.norcomsoftware.com/

Hello, I want that people from other servers like ekiga.net can make calls to my users. When I do an "allowguest=no" then people from other domains cannot call me. So I think I need "allowguest=yes". Maybe something like this? ------------- <default> include => users <dialout> include => users exten=_0.,1,Dial(SIP/trunk/0${EXTEN:1},30,tT) <users>

I have a debian woody machine acting as a firewall for a small network. I am trying to do a simple DNAT to port 80 on the protected webserver and masquerade all traffic from the protect subnet outbound. After having read the FAQ and various posts regarding problems with DNAT I''m afraid I''m no closer to a solution. Based on the output from "shorewall show nat" I

Hi everybody. We are running Shorewall and Squid on Suse on the same box. Each is working fine independently, but we can''t get them to cooperate. The access log in squid shows no requests when Shorewall is on. Here are all the changes we made in the configuration files. Everything else is the same. We have read through the mailing list and the guide, but still haven''t figured it

Hey! No, actually shorewall works very well and starts and so on... Thanks for this! Problem is that it won''t start on boot it seems. At least it doesn''t enable forwarding. However, if I do /etc/init.d/shorewall restart it enables forwarding and the rest... But not if I do /etc/init.d/shorewall start ;) Seems weird... System is Debian Sid, Shorewall is prepackaged by Debian...

On my windows machine I use a software fire will called ZoneAlarm. One feature I like Is the ability to block applications from using the net. I''ve looked with Shorewall and wonder if it does, or was ever meant to. Not a complaint, a curiosity. Kev -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: winmail.dat Type: application/ms-tnef Size: 1572 bytes

Hi there: I have this configuration: |-----[Server 2] | [Internet]--------[Router]----------[Switch]------------ [Server 1] | |-----[PC1] | |-----[PC2] | |-----[PC3] Server 1 has IP 216.251.XXX.XX1 Server 2 has IP 216.251.XXX.XX2 PC1 has IP 216.251.XXX.XX3 PC2 has IP 192.168.XXX.1 PC3 has IP 192.168.XXX.2 How do I configure shorewall in SERVER 2 to block to/from the Internet Port 22

hi list, i''m new to linux and shorewall. i''m facing a problem to browse the net from local network. IF my client machines are connected to firewall via switch, then can not browse the internet but i can ping any site using fqdn like (www.google.com). IF i connect a single pc directly to the firewall using cross-over cable to the internal interface, then i''m able to

I am running Red Hat Linux 8.0 and I want to install Shorewall. I have downloaded it as LATEST.rpm. I downloaded it to /root/downloads/shorewall. When I issue "rpm -qip LATEST.rpm" I get "Name: shorewall; Version: 1.3.14". The "Installation and Upgrade" page at shorewall.net says "* Install the RPM (rpm -ivh <shorewall rpm>)." Obviously it

And it looks like there''s a bug. I have a "firewall" with a single ethernet interface that splits into a network zone and a local zone and as a consequence I have a hosts file with the following in it: net eth0:!192.168.0.0/24 loc eth0:192.168.0.0/24 When I run shorewall start, I get an error, running in debug mode and capturing the output give me: + run_iptables -A

On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 11:03 -0800, Tom Eastep wrote: > On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 10:45 -0800, Tom Eastep wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 13:43 -0500, M Lu wrote: > > > Tom, can he specify openvpn twice in the tunnel file, e.g. > > > > > > openvpn:udp:5000 > > > openvpn:udp:5001 > > > > > > I think I had the problems with that so I use

I want smtp requests from the internet to address 202.1.2.3 are to be forwarded to 192.168.1.109, so I set ORIGINAL DEST is 202.1.2.3 but when I restart it show error: iptables v1.2.11: invalid TCP port/service `210.0.214.212'' specified Try `iptables -h'' or ''iptables --help'' for more information. ERROR: Command "/sbin/iptables -A net2loc -p tcp

Via creative use of the instructions at http://shorewall.net/Multiple_Zones.html#id2497549. But can a zone (in shorewall/interfaces) reference multiple interfaces? I have two openvpn instances running on my server, one bridged (for upstream access to some client vpn''s so I don''t have to request the clients add new subnets to their routing tables) and one routed (for nailed

I tried to the new GATEWAY option in /etc/shorewal/interfaces file but it didnt work. My network setting consists of 2 ISPs line and i would like to have eth0 to connect to for example, 192.168.15.254 while eth1 connected to 192.168.33.254. I restarted shorewall and nothing is wrong. However, the traffic still goes to the default gateway as shown in "route -n" command. For example, i

Hello, I am stumped on a problem I am having with Shorewall 2.0.1 on Mandrake 10. My setup is as follows. I have a /28 and have assiigned all ip addresses to my firewall using aliases. I am able to setup rules to allow specific traffic to specfic ip addresses on the firewall like so: ACCEPT net:w.x.y.z $FW:w.x.y.z tcp 22 This works great for TCP and UDP traffic. I can

Has anyone successfully setup a shorewall Ucarp solution?

Hello Tom, I''ve been using Shorewall for years without problems. My previous version of shorewall was 1.4.6b-1. Everything worked just fine. Today I upgraded using rpm to 2.0.8-1. After update no one can connect to any interface from net. Server can connect to outside world fine and those described in routestopped have no problem connecting. Any help correcting this problem would be

Hi, I am running Gentoo 1.4, with the 2.4.19 vanilla kernel, and merged shorewall-1.3.9b. I have dropunclean set on eth0 in /etc/shorewall/interfaces. I double checked that I compiled "Unclean match support (EXPERIMENTAL)" into the kernel, but I still get "modprobe: Can''t locate module ipt_unclean" logged when I run ''shorewall status''. Does it