similar to: Need advice! Beginning wine development!

I''ve just pushed out a new integration branch to my git repo. This is purely bugfix patches -- there are no new features in this issue of the integration branch. I''ve got a stack of about a dozen more patches with new features in them still to go. I''ll be working on those tomorrow. As always, there''s minimal testing involved here, but it does at least compile on

I''m trying to compile the btrfs source code but I''m getting an error. Any suggestions? Thanks Joe [root@ol6 btrfs-progs]# uname -a Linux ol6.localdomain 2.6.39-400.17.2.el6uek.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Mar 13 12:31:05 PDT 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@ol6 src]# git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git Initialized empty Git repository in

I read the exchange regarding > 8 char passwords on Unixware from the end of June. Is anything being done to add support for >8 character passwords on SCO OSR6 (in udk mode)? I have it working by calling osr5bigcrypt(), instead of bigcrypt(), in openbsd-compat/xcrypt.c and linking with -lcrypt. libcrypt has bigcrypt(), but for whatever reason, openssh built with it fails to authenticate

I have spent some time digging through the archives for comments concerning Asterisk and monitoring systems, and I have found few results. check_asterisk.pl.gz (http://www.dynx.net/ASTERISK/misc-progs/) which gives an error on download, and has no further Google references astping.tar (http://www.dynx.net/ASTERISK/misc-progs/ and also in the mailing list archives) supposedly sends a query to

Hi, Pino 在 2015年06月18日 16:41, Pino Toscano 写道: > Hi, > > On Thursday 18 June 2015 11:01:37 Cao jin wrote: >>> Speaking of this: you said that you have a colleague working on >>> btrfs-progs? What about suggesting to create some machine-parseable >>> output (csv, xml, yaml, json, whatever) so extracting the results of >>> btrfs tools is a lot more easy?

An old version of btrfs-progs (3.17 in this case) has a different version string, so adapt our filtering to include this line as well. Related to/updates commit 839ae5bcd537b3dc4f13bbea6fe40091ebc2b7f0. --- daemon/btrfs.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/daemon/btrfs.c b/daemon/btrfs.c index d18f518..23513a9 100644 --- a/daemon/btrfs.c +++ b/daemon/btrfs.c @@

Hello I think, I somewhat destroyed my btrfs filesystem on my Ubuntu 13.04 kernel 3.8.0-25-lowlatency system. It got destroyed, because the system was hanging for some other reason and I had to remove power... When I try to mount my filesystem (there''s only one, with a few subfilesystems), the system crashes. Also btrfsck dies; always like this: a@ask-home:~$ sudo

Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de> Acked-by: Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com> --- Makefile | 2 +- Makefile.target | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 37c7066..594f0ef 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ endif install: all $(if $(BUILD_DOCS),install-doc) mkdir -p

Hi, Pino 在 2015年06月17日 23:37, Pino Toscano 写道: > Hi, > > On Wednesday 17 June 2015 10:12:59 Cao jin wrote: >>>> @@ -2083,3 +2083,72 @@ do_btrfs_image (char *const *sources, const char *image, >>>> >>>> return 0; >>>> } >>>> + >>>> +char ** >>>> +do_btrfs_device_stats (const char *path, int zero)

Hello, I''ve just pulled btrfs-progs from the new git repo git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git However, when I come to make it fails like so: gcc -Wp,-MMD,./.btrfsctl.o.d,-MT,btrfsctl.o -Wall -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -Werror -Os -c btrfsctl.c gcc -g -Werror -Os -o btrfsctl btrfsctl.o ctree.o disk-io.o radix-tree.o extent-tree.o

Most fixes are trivial. The one from Alex is fixing a real bug that several users have reported. Alex sent the patch half a year ago and it was not yet integrated. The patch "Use /proc/mounts instead of /etc/mtab" is a repost. The patch "btrfs-receive optionally honors the end-cmd" is a preparation step to allow backup tools to multiplex a single communication stream (e.g. a

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 08:56:25PM +0300, Maxim Perevedentsev wrote: > I have an issue with btrfs: > > There's an API > > btrfs inspect-internal min-dev-size /sysroot/ > > But this API is available only in btrfs-progs >= 4.2. > Before this, there's no reliable way to get minimum size (I could > parse "btrfs filesystem show", but it is veeery

Hi everyone, I''ve updated the master branch with the pending stable btrfs-progs commit that should make the 0.20 release. Thanks to Hugh for helping to queue up a few of them. We''ll have more frequent releases from here as we pull in the major new features going into progs (raid5/6, send/receive, quotas, fsck improvements). Please give it a shot and let me know if you see any

tune2fs against a LVM (albeit formatted with ext4) is not the same as tune2fs against ext4. Could this possibly be a machine where uptime has outlived its usefulness? On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Matt Garman <matthew.garman at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > ># rpm -qf `which

some files depend on nodes.h, but there is no dependency for that fact. olaf@mandarine:~/klibc-0.87> grep -Er 'include.*nodes.h' ash/ | sed 's-^[^/]\+/\([^.]*\).*-\1.o-' | xargs echo OBJ_NODES = OBJ_NODES = cd.o eval.o exec.o expand.o jobs.o main.o nodes.o options.o parser.o redir.o show.o trap.o var.o make spotless doesnt work reliable, the patch adds a few more targets. Is

[root@btrfs progs-unstable]# btrfsctl -A /dev/sdb ioctl returns 0 [root@btrfs progs-unstable]# btrfsctl -A /dev/sdc ioctl returns 0 /dev/sdb has a btrfs, while /dev/sdc is blank. What''s that output supposed to mean ? Is it a bug ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info

Hi, I've a really big problem with my SAMBA 4.1.11 production server.... it doesn't want to start smbd anymore.... nmbd starts fine but not smbd. I've tried to start smbd in interactive mode to see what's happened : # /srv/progs/samba4/sbin/smbd -i -d9 produce a lot of lines about configuration (all fine), some last lines are : added interface lo ip=::1

hi guys, I tried compiling wine-20040213 today but I got the following error: make[2]: Entering directory `/progs/build/wine-20040213/dlls/x11drv' gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -I/usr/X11R6/include -D__WINESRC__ -DBINDIR="\"/usr/bin\"" -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -fno-strict-aliasing -gstabs+ -Wpointer-arith -g -O2 -o

All - I''ve put together a new integration branch based on Chris''s new master. This includes the userspace patches for qgroups, restriper, and Josef''s restore utility, plus a bunch of other things with mostly minor impact. The shortlog is attached at the end of this email. As always, it''s available from:

On Sat, April 30, 2016 8:54 am, William Warren wrote: > uptime=insecurity. This sounds like MS Windows admin's statement. Are there any Unix admins still left around who remember systems with kernel that doesn't need [security] patching for few years? And libc that does not need security patches often. I almost said glibc, but on those Unixes it was libc; glibc, however, wasn't