Displaying 20 results from an estimated 90000 matches similar to: "Wine on a Mac Netbook?"
2017 Jun 05
2
C6 or C7 for an old netbook
On 06/05/2017 11:15 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 10:31:10AM -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
>> I've got an old HP Netbook, which is just fine for taking with when I'm
>> travelling, to check email and news. I have a very old Ubuntu
>> netbook-remix on it, and it really, *really* needs to be updated to
>> something current. I, of course, would
2017 Jun 05
4
C6 or C7 for an old netbook
I've got an old HP Netbook, which is just fine for taking with when I'm
travelling, to check email and news. I have a very old Ubuntu
netbook-remix on it, and it really, *really* needs to be updated to
something current. I, of course, would prefer CentOS....
The question is: I see that *if* the specs I just looked up (I'm at work,
not home, where I could just turn it on, but they
2017 Jun 06
3
C6 or C7 for an old netbook
On Mon, 5 Jun 2017, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
> Mmmm... looks like I may go for C6, then, since unlike that Ubuntu, I will
> want to do updates at least every time I get ready for a trip (other
> times, it sits in the closet turned off).
I went for C6 on a Samsung NC10 (1.6GHz Atom N270 1GB RAM), only because it
refused to boot off the C7 ISO for some reason, and I didn't want to
2017 Jun 05
0
C6 or C7 for an old netbook
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 06/05/2017 11:15 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 10:31:10AM -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
>>> I've got an old HP Netbook, which is just fine for taking with when I'm
>>> travelling, to check email and news. I have a very old Ubuntu
>>> netbook-remix on it, and it really, *really* needs to be updated to
2017 Jun 05
0
C6 or C7 for an old netbook
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 10:31:10AM -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
> I've got an old HP Netbook, which is just fine for taking with when I'm
> travelling, to check email and news. I have a very old Ubuntu
> netbook-remix on it, and it really, *really* needs to be updated to
> something current. I, of course, would prefer CentOS....
>
> The question is: I see that *if*
2017 Jun 07
1
C6 or C7 for an old netbook
On 06/07/2017 12:39 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 06/06/2017 02:53 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
>> On Mon, 5 Jun 2017, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>>> Mmmm... looks like I may go for C6, then, since unlike that Ubuntu, I
>>> will
>>> want to do updates at least every time I get ready for a trip (other
>>> times, it sits in the closet turned off).
2012 Dec 05
1
Problems with Acer netbook freezing on syslinux bootup
Hi!
I'm not a programmer, so I will try and be as clear as I can.
I currently have an Acer Aspire One which has issues with syslinux 4.06
When I try and make a usb bootable install key using common automated
programs under windows (Universal USB installer from Pendrivelinux, LiLi
and unetbootin), they all fail when booted on the netbook.
Now, I know it's an issue with syslinux for many
2017 Jun 07
0
C6 or C7 for an old netbook
On 06/06/2017 02:53 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2017, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Mmmm... looks like I may go for C6, then, since unlike that Ubuntu, I
>> will
>> want to do updates at least every time I get ready for a trip (other
>> times, it sits in the closet turned off).
>
> I went for C6 on a Samsung NC10 (1.6GHz Atom N270 1GB RAM), only
2014 Feb 28
2
'virsh capabilities' on Debian Wheezy-amd64 reports different cpu to Wheezy-i386 (on same hardware)
Hi
On a range of Dell servers containing Intel 64bit processors, 'virsh
capabilities' reports the cpu differently on Debian Wheezy-amd64 and
Wheezy-i386. The results given by the Wheezy-i386 version seem very
wrong (since n270 is an Atom processor). Apart from architecture, the
package versions of libvirt-bin are identical: 1.2.1-1~bpo70+1.
/usr/share/libvirt/cpu_map.xml files are
2016 Dec 07
1
MSYS2 'make check' output xapian-core-1.4.1-1
System: Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition
CPUs: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N270 @1.60GHz
setup for the 'Git for Windows' with MSYS2
gcc-6.1.0 plus utilties and libraries were added
http://nurmi-labs.blogspot.com/2016/11/git.html
obviously, with Home Edition, no network was setup
http://nurmi-labs.blogspot.com/p/xapian-ms.html
System: Slackware Linux (version 14.0)
CPUs: Intel(R) Atom(TM)
2014 Mar 03
2
Re: 'virsh capabilities' on Debian Wheezy-amd64 reports different cpu to Wheezy-i386 (on same hardware)
On 03/03/2014 13:42, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 11:15:51AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote:
>> On 03/03/2014 10:55, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:47:03AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote:
>>>> On 03/03/2014 10:44, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:30:11AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote:
2014 Mar 03
2
Re: 'virsh capabilities' on Debian Wheezy-amd64 reports different cpu to Wheezy-i386 (on same hardware)
Hi Martin
Thanks for your response. Here's the output of that grep:
# grep ^flags /proc/cpuinfo | sort -u
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca
cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall
nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl
xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf eagerfpu pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor
2015 Apr 15
7
Related to the new laptop question: CentOS on a netbook?
I've got a netbook, circe 2009. When I got it, not that I was wild about
ubuntu, but there was specifically an ubuntu netbook remix. Well, it's a
few years later - has anyone put CentOS (6, preferably) on a netbook, and
were there any problems?
mark
2014 Mar 03
0
Re: 'virsh capabilities' on Debian Wheezy-amd64 reports different cpu to Wheezy-i386 (on same hardware)
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 02:15:43PM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote:
>
>
> On 03/03/2014 13:42, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 11:15:51AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote:
> >> On 03/03/2014 10:55, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:47:03AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote:
> >>>> On 03/03/2014 10:44, Martin
2014 Mar 03
2
Re: 'virsh capabilities' on Debian Wheezy-amd64 reports different cpu to Wheezy-i386 (on same hardware)
On 03/03/2014 10:44, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:30:11AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote:
>> Hi Martin
>>
>> Thanks for your response. Here's the output of that grep:
>>
>> # grep ^flags /proc/cpuinfo | sort -u
>> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca
>> cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx
2020 Mar 29
3
Upgrade to CentOS8
Hi Phil
Here it is:
[root at totorbex ~]# lspci -nn
.00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium
Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Series SoC Transaction Register [8086:2280]
(rev 21)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation
Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Integrated Graphics
Controller [8086:22b1] (rev 21)
00:10.0 SD Host controller
2014 Mar 03
2
Re: 'virsh capabilities' on Debian Wheezy-amd64 reports different cpu to Wheezy-i386 (on same hardware)
On 03/03/2014 10:55, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:47:03AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote:
>> On 03/03/2014 10:44, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 10:30:11AM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote:
>>>> Hi Martin
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your response. Here's the output of that grep:
>>>>
2014 Mar 03
0
Re: 'virsh capabilities' on Debian Wheezy-amd64 reports different cpu to Wheezy-i386 (on same hardware)
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 03:45:01PM +0000, Struan Bartlett wrote:
> Hi
>
> On a range of Dell servers containing Intel 64bit processors, 'virsh
> capabilities' reports the cpu differently on Debian Wheezy-amd64 and
> Wheezy-i386. The results given by the Wheezy-i386 version seem very
> wrong (since n270 is an Atom processor). Apart from architecture, the
> package
2012 Oct 30
2
[LLVMdev] Status of YAML IO?
On Oct 30, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Shankar Easwaran wrote:
>>>
>>> 3) How are you planning to support Atom specific flags ? Is there a way already ?
>>> (This would be needed to group similiar atoms together)
>> It is still an open question how to support platform specific Atom attributes. As much as possible we'd like to expand the Atom model to be a superset
2012 Oct 30
0
[LLVMdev] Status of YAML IO?
Hi Nick,
Thanks for your reply.
How about if the atom flags could be overridden ? The Atom flag could have a MIN/MAX and anything above the MAX or lower than the MIN are platform specific, like how its dealt with section indexes ?
> I know ELF file format has some ranges for various values that are specifically reserved for processors or "user" defined functionality. It serves the