similar to: How to record accent on Wine

First, download it. [Image: http://www.linux-ren.org/uploads/newbb/keditor_file/20100911180933_83584.jpg ] [Image: http://www.linux-ren.org/uploads/newbb/keditor_file/20100911180929_24253.jpg ] Install it Find and run it: [Image: http://www.linux-ren.org/uploads/newbb/keditor_file/20100911180949_81778.jpg ] [Image: http://www.linux-ren.org/uploads/newbb/keditor_file/20100911180909_49657.jpg ]

On Nov 19, 2008, at 7:41 AM, Jack Tzu-Han Hung wrote: > Hi, > > I found a problem in CodeExtractor::severSplitPHINodes() > <CodeExtractor.cpp>. > > The algorithm first separates the header block into two, one > containing only PHI nodes and the other containing the remaining non- > PHI nodes. The variable NewBB holds the pointer to the latter half > block.

Hi, I found a problem in CodeExtractor::severSplitPHINodes() <CodeExtractor.cpp>. The algorithm first separates the header block into two, one containing only PHI nodes and the other containing the remaining non-PHI nodes. The variable NewBB holds the pointer to the latter half block. Later, it tries to update DT information. if (DT) DT->splitBlock(NewBB); In splitBlock, it checks

Hi Team, I am migrating one of the Pass that was written for llvm2.2 or older to llvm3.1. The code snippet looks like the following: Constant *func; void add( Module *M) { func = M->getOrInsertFunction("func", Type::getVoidTy(M->getContext()), NULL); } virtual bool runOnModule(Module &M) { add (&M); for(Module::iterator F = M.begin(), E = M.end(); F !=

Hi Ahmad, On 03/01/13 16:26, Hassan, Ahmad wrote: > Hi Team, > > I am migrating one of the Pass that was written for llvm2.2 or older to llvm3.1. > The code snippet looks like the following: > > Constant *func; > > void add( Module *M) { > > func = M->getOrInsertFunction("func", Type::getVoidTy(M->getContext()), NULL); this function has no

Hi Devang, Thanks for your reply. But if you look at the comment of BasicBlock::splitBasicBlock(), it says that "...an unconditional branch is added to the new BB, and the rest of the instructions in the BB are moved to the newBB, including the old terminator." So, the terminator of the newBB is exactly the same as the terminator of the oldBB. IF the oldBB has multiple successors,

Hi, I got a problem when I am trying to add a dummy basic block. Let say there are two blocks, A and B. A----->B I am trying to generate new BB called C which is located between A and B, but not break the edge of AB. The graph is like the following A---->B \ / \ / C There is new BB 'C' with edges AC and CB. It is kind of like what breakcriticaledge pass does.

There might be a misuse of DominatorTree::splitBasicBlock in CodeExtractor.cpp, line 145. Header is splited into two (OldPred->NewBB). Line 145 updates the dominator tree by calling DT->splitBasicBlock(NewBB). I think it should be DT->splitBasicBlock(OldPred). When I tried to extract a code region whose header has 2 successors, my pass crashed. It was because header (or OldPred) is the

Hi, I'm gonna try to give some feedback, but I have only been working with LLVM for a few days, so don't take what I'm saying without verifying :-) > BasicBlock *ProgSlicer::CloneBasicBlock(const BasicBlock *BB, > DenseMap<const Value*, Value*> &ValueMap, > const char *NameSuffix, Function *F) { > > BasicBlock

We have CentOS Forums here: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/ Akemi Yagi (toracat on IRC) and Fabian Arrotin (arrfab on IRC) are the Forum Moderators. There are a lot of posts there that I find helpful when doing web searches ... but we could use more people answering questions there. Also, we specifically need some people to answer questions concerning Oracle database deployment in the

Hi all, I am trying to write a pass where i am creating a clone of a function (the only difference being, the new function returns void , instead of any value). I am creating a new Function Type with a void return type (rest being the same as original function), and using this i am creating a new function body. Then, i clone the body of the old function into new function, but when ever i

We have CentOS Forums here: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/ Akemi Yagi (toracat on IRC) and Fabian Arrotin (arrfab on IRC) are the Forum Moderators. There are a lot of posts there that I find helpful when doing web searches ... but we could use more people answering questions there. Also, we specifically need some people to answer questions concerning Oracle database deployment in the

On Dec 31, 2010, at 11:20 AM, Vu Le wrote: > There might be a misuse of DominatorTree::splitBasicBlock in CodeExtractor.cpp, line 145. > Header is splited into two (OldPred->NewBB). > > Line 145 updates the dominator tree by calling DT->splitBasicBlock(NewBB). > I think it should be DT->splitBasicBlock(OldPred). > > When I tried to extract a code region whose

Hello! I was advised by the forum moderator to ask for contribution: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=20223&forum=38&post_id=76546#forumpost76546 My wiki login is VladislavRastrusny I would like to contribute for Tips & Tricks section with a small automated script to install webmin repository data and webmin itself from here:

On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Morten Ofstad wrote: > It seems the CloneBasicBlock function defined in Transforms/Utils/Cloning.h > doesn't change the parent BasicBlock of the contained instructions when it > has cloned them -- Is this a bug or a feature? I'm not sure I understand. This code: Instruction *NewInst = II->clone(); ..

Hi All, Quick question, I just finished googling and found the thread that is dealing with the rpmdup_remover.sh script, and thanks to everyone that was involved in this. I followed the following threads: http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/centos at centos.org/11086209.html http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&topic_id=17166&forum=37 Which lead me to the

I'm having an issue with the CodeExtractor. When I try to extract the lone basic block from the following function, I get an assertion error. define i32 @test(i32 %x) { %tmp = call i32 @test3( i32 %x ) ; <i32> [#uses=1] ret i32 %tmp } The assertion error is: lli: Dominators.cpp:71: void llvm::DominatorTree::splitBlock(llvm::BasicBlock*): Assertion

hi, I connect to an NT server from an AIX server which have install the samba 2.2.5 suite. For this, i use the command smbclient .... I connect, with no problem on this server NT. I move in the repertories with the order cd. But when, i found a directory on the NT with i can't move on it. I always have an error of directory not found. Smbclient see me the correct name of directory with his

This is a multi-part message in MIME format --cbbddbee-7174-4dcb-b902-950f66a8d044 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Q: " Would you like to Lose Your Accent ? " - DO YOU FIND OTHERS HAVE A HARD TIME UNDERSTANDING WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO = CONVEY? - DO YOU FIND THE NEED TO REPEAT YOURSELF FOR OTHERS TO UNDERSTAND YOU = CLEARLY? -

This is a multi-part message in MIME format --cbbddbee-7174-4dcb-b902-950f66a8d044 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Q: " Would you like to Lose Your Accent ? " - DO YOU FIND OTHERS HAVE A HARD TIME UNDERSTANDING WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO = CONVEY? - DO YOU FIND THE NEED TO REPEAT YOURSELF FOR OTHERS TO UNDERSTAND YOU = CLEARLY? -