similar to: Installing K-Pacs under WINE

Hi, I tried using v1.6.0 of the scriptaculous libraries (including latest prototype library) in one of my existing apps that uses the 1.5.1 version, and found that IE 6 was very unstable. Actions get slower and slower over time until the page is basically unusable. This continues until the browser window closes - a page refresh does not solve the problem. I can''t provide the exact code

I have a function that needs to be repeated many times with for loop. I have take measure to rm all the big arrays that was used in the function. The only array that cannot be rm was the return arrays. The loop needed to be repeat for over 2000 times and I am using v1.6.0 in Windows 2000 When I look at the task manager, I see that the memory used by R keep going up and reach more than 1G byte

I have plots that were stored using recordPlot() in a fairly recent but pre-1.6.0 version of R that will not replayPlot() in R 1.6.0. The error message is Error in replayPlot(x) : invalid hex digit in color or lty The plots were stored in June (2002-6-14), each as an element of a list named 'rpl'. The version of R that was current then is what I used. At that time I was able to

Everyone, Have any of you had any luck getting aeskulap to work with Centos7. We have just migrated some desktops from Fedora 20 to Centos. but aeskulap is not in the centos 7 repos. aeskulap was a decent dicom viewer and was able to connect to our pacs server. If there are other viewers that any of you have used I would be interested in the dialog of what you have used and any difficulties

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > >> On Feb 24, 2016, at 9:55 PM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I switched from "configure and make" to "cmake" build-system and >> wanted to speedup my build. >> >> In my build-script I

> Which combination of cmake/ninja versions are you using (latest are > v3.4.3 and v1.6.0)? > With this combination I could reduce build-time down from approx. 3h down to 01h20m. $ egrep -i 'jobs|ninja' llvm-build/CMakeCache.txt //Program used to build from build.ninja files. CMAKE_MAKE_PROGRAM:FILEPATH=/opt/cmake/bin/ninja //Define the maximum number of concurrent compilation

>From R v1.6.0 there has been a new test added to the library() code. This test is performed when library() is ran on a "unix" system and it verifies that the "Built" platform (from the DESCRIPTION file) is "compatible" with the current platform. Here is the code extract from the local function testRversion() of library() that I am talking about: if

Full_Name: Henrik Bengtsson Version: 1.6.0, 1.5.1 OS: WinXP Pro Submission from: (NULL) (128.250.252.82) The following example, which I tested on both R v1.5.1 and R v1.6.0 on WinXP Pro, shows the problem I encountered when trying to use the class attribute of an environment: # Define method print() for class Environment C print(e) # gives: # [1] "An Environment!" # Exit [R]

> On Mar 1, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Chris Bieneman <cbieneman at apple.com> wrote: > > There are a few notes I'd like to add to this thread. > > (1) we have a number of places throughout out CMake build where we use features from newer CMakes gated by version checks. Most of these features are performance or usability related. None of them are correctness. Using the latest

On linux (not Windows) I doubt using Ninja vs make will make drastic differences.. (Others with actual numbers please chime in to correct me) /* I think the difference could be more beneficial if you're doing incremental builds, but I don't think that is what you're doing.. */ On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On

For faster builds and rebuilds you should definitely read: https://blogs.s-osg.org/an-introduction-to-accelerating-your-build-with-clang/ https://blogs.s-osg.org/a-conclusion-to-accelerating-your-build-with-clang/ Hope this helps! On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 9:17 PM, ChrisBieneman via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On Mar 1, 2016, at 10:01 AM, Mehdi Amini

Hey Chris, Sedat was asking for a way to "to speedup my build" and those blog posts were really helpful to me. Anyway LLVM_DISTRIBUTION_COMPONENTS sounds very cool, hope you will push your code soon! On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Chris Bieneman <cbieneman at apple.com> wrote: > Fabio, the work I was mentioning here is an extension beyond those blog > posts. > >

> On Mar 2, 2016, at 4:22 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > > I got some more inspirations on how to speedup my build and integrated > the URLs into my scripts (attached). > > For example to use GOLD as linker or to use '-O3' OptLevel maybe in > combination with LTO and PGO (using '-O3 -flto -fprofile-use'). LTO *will* slow down

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Tilmann Scheller <tilmann at osg.samsung.com> wrote: > Hi Sedat, > > On 03/03/2016 08:09 AM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev wrote: >> >> It might be that a CLANG generated with LTO/PGO speeds up the build. >> Can you confirm this? > > Yes, a Clang host compiler built with LTO or PGO is generally faster than an > -O3 build. >

Googling around, I found that apparently adding to the gem file will fix my problems, but where do i find the gem file? what is the name of the gem file? "group :test do # Pretty printed test output gem ''minitest'' ####### add this line ####### end" Here is what happens when i run rake test, please note that i have already installed minitest

V1.6.1 (2006-04-06): Sortable Trees, Prototype 1.5.0_rc0 (fixes IE mem leaks)! New features in V1.6.1 and V1.6.0: * Update to Prototype 1.5.0_rc0 * Sortable trees [thx Sammi Williams, sammi-EeRYXuc1dym5PgFUrJwY1aU/zSkkHjvu@public.gmane.org] See the functional test (test/functional/sortable_tree_test.html) and the CHANGELOG for more information! * Add Draggable object as third parameter

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1021 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |pablo at netfilter.org --- Comment #1 from Pablo

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1052 Bug ID: 1052 Summary: iptables -wL fails Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ip_tables (kernel) Assignee: netfilter-buglog at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1186 Bug ID: 1186 Summary: ip6tables-restore not passing useful error messages from ip6tables Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 Bug ID: 1313 Summary: proper return codes Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables over nftable Assignee: pablo at