similar to: Internet Explorer

Is it even remotely possible that after a successful rsync, the file sizes on both ends are different ??? We use rsync extensively to distribute our builds across all our development sites. Here is how our rsync process works 1. SiteA creates a build #1 2. SiteB rsync's build #1 3. SiteA creates a build #2 4. SiteB rsync's build #2 using contents of build #01 (i.e. we rsync build #02

It seems the GVNPRE pass has been removed from the main trunk, though it is present in the 2.6 release. From the llvm-commits archive, I found that it was removed  with this checkin: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20090928/088214.html "remove the GVNPRE pass. It has been subsumed by the GVN pass." Does the GVN pass optimize all the partial redundancies

For those of you following the IBM vs SCO legal case, you have probably noticed that SCO has said that the GPL is invalid. IBM appears to make the reasonable case that you can't say something is void, and then rely on it. INAL, but why is SCO allowed to distribute Samba without agreeing to the GPL? That's like buying a car, then claiming the sale agreement is bogus but you still want

We had something similar, and as far as I recall the problem turned out to be that we had not set the config file to allow remote connections. This would probably be better put on the Rosuda mailing list: http://mailman.rz.uni-augsburg.de/mailman/listinfo/stats-rosuda-devel Hope this helps, Matt Wiener -----Original Message----- From: r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch [mailto:r-help-bounces

On 06/14/18 11:16, Peter Kjellstr?m wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 10:12:30 -0500 > Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > >> On 06/14/18 10:00, Peter Kjellstr?m wrote: >>> On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:26:27 +0200 >>> Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com> wrote: >>> ... >>>>>> The src.rpm for that kernel is

Hello, CentOS team and everyone who cares about CentOS, Huawei release an Euler OS, which is an distribution based on CentOS. http://developer.huawei.com/ict/en/site-euleros/euleros-introduction According to CentOS's statement, CentOS is distributed under the GPLv2 License. http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7.4.1708/os/x86_64/EULA The GPL license requires the modified version to be

All.... I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker staff have been helpful but no cigar. At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received the same error. One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called eula which fails. ./eula: cannot execute

Hello, Peter, thanks for your reply 1. Huawei DOES change the distribution EULA, if type in the following command: vi /usr/share/eula/eula.en_US you can see it changed to "HUAWEI EulerOS-2.0" which is a copyright one, let alone original GPL license. According to CentOS Linux EULA The Distribution is released as GPLv2. Individual packages in the distribution come with their own

Today I did a yum upgrade to my kvm'ized Centos 7 test machine (perhaps a bad day to do such a thing) and received new kernel vmlinuz-3.10.0-229.1.2.el7.x86_64, among many other things. When I rebooted, I was asked to confirm (or renew, or some such) my license. My LICENSE ??? I was booting in text mode and the actions required were a) unfamiliar, and b) hard to understand. As I recall, I

> Ben reports that he didn't get a tarball even after the rpath fix and > had to disable -o pipefail to get one. Still not sure what caused > this. 'make check' failures can cause this. I had to revert r241599 to get a package. > Appendix: compiler-rt test failures > =================================== > Just to add Mips to this: On big-endian Mips32r2:

On 06/15/2018 01:33 PM, Keith Keller wrote: > On 2018-06-14, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >> >> It turns out you are absolutely right. You only have provide modified >> source to users to whom you distribute derived work. Found it here: >> >> https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#GPLRequireSourcePostedPublic > > Not

----- Original Message ----- > From: "James Y Knight via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at llvm.org> > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 6:08:08 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: Introducing an LLVM Community Code of Conduct > ... > >

The most recent version of GSConfigure is available at www.buffalo.edu/~sbesch Several serious bugs that kept the program from getting started have been ferreted out and corrected with the help of Bruce Komito. The program is now actually running on someone's machine other than mine. I have built this version with the oldest copies of the system dll's that I could find inn an effort

We need to resell systems that run commercial software on Linux. We were using Red Hat ES 3 originally. But we later realize that we cannot redistribute RHES without paying them huge subscription fee because of the trademark. I came across CentOS from WBEL mailing list. This looks like a godsend to me. I have some questions regarding CentOS. I would appreciate it if someone can provide me the

I have a CentOS 5 VM in vmware I wanted to move to work on KVM/libvirt. I used qemu-img to convert it to a qcow2 image, loaded virt-manager and created a new VM pointed at that qcow2 image. The boot paniced when it tried to mount the root filesystem also complaining about not being able to remount the swap partition. I played around and was able to get it to boot by changing the Virtual disk

Hi all, I''m running XP and 2003 Server fine as HVM guests (under a 32 bit non-pae Xen 3.0.3 self-compiled). I''ve read that Vista can *not* be /installed/ under Xen for it checks for ACPI support and install fails if it isn''t present. What if I do the install first from, say, plain Qemu (I''re reused qemu images from Xen) or VMWare (I''ve converted

Hi, I removed the openoffice 1.1 release from my system (kernel 2.6.9) for install the full OpenOffice 2.1. But after trying to start the new soffice, nothing happen. (may be java problem ?) Could someone help me ? Regards? __________________________ Ce message (et toutes ses pi?ces jointes ?ventuelles) est confidentiel et ?tabli ? l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute

Hello, hope all are well. Am I missing something? If I add a cdrom and change boot order in a running vm with virsh edit, I have to shutdown the vm and restart to see the change in boot order. I can not just restart the vm via reboot inside the vm or virsh reboot vm. I don't see anything under /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/saved where I might expect conflict if I was battling against a saved

Hello, a problem occurred during making a snapshot for a guest, ask for help... 1. the xml for snapshotdomain like this: # cat deployment.1 <domainsnapshot> <name>a</name> <disks> <disk name='/home/qcow2/disk.0'> <driver type='qcow2'/> <source file='/home/qcow2/disk.3'/> </disk> </disks>

On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, Johan Vermeulen wrote: > is switching to Mate an option for you? I'm also not entirely sure which bit is causing you the bother, so I'm not sure what to advise. I install with kickstart with: eula --agreed firstboot --disable I create /etc/gdm/custom.conf in %post: [daemon] InitialSetupEnable=False I think that's my lot. jh