similar to: Re: Wine crashes with ~/.wine on mount point with noexec set ind

Hey all, I just decided I was too much out of space on my normal Linux partition. I had a spare partition, so I mkfs.ext4'd it, created a directory 'wine' owned by me, moved all contents of ~/.wine to it, and ran a sudo mount -o bind /media/sdb2/wine /home/dazjorz/.wine. I proceeded to take a look inside and everything was, of course, just fine. When I ran "wine

Sjors Gielen wrote: > Of course it won't. I guessed that was by design. Yet, crashing seems like a little too much for me. There isn't much Wine can do, it's "crashing" outside of Wine. Wine doesn't even have a chance to load the program in question.

On 06/10/2013 01:41 PM, pr.G wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 09:29:32AM +0400, свящ. Георгий Гольцов wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 09:07:08AM +0800, Gao feng wrote: >>> On 06/09/2013 08:14 PM, pr.G wrote: >>>> Hello. >>>> >>>> Is it possible to start container via libvirt_lxc without mounting /sys >>>> inside container?

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 09:07:08AM +0800, Gao feng wrote: > On 06/09/2013 08:14 PM, pr.G wrote: > > Hello. > > > > Is it possible to start container via libvirt_lxc without mounting /sys > > inside container? > > > > When I start container via lxc-start and do not add mount point to config, > > then /sys inside container is empty. > > >

Package: xen-utils-4.1 Version: 4.1.4-3+deb7u1 Severity: important When an LVM LV that serves as the root disk for a Xen DomU contains a boot loader (or possibly other data) in its volume boot record, pygrub fails to boot it, printing "Error: boot loader didn't return any data" before exiting. I think this is because of the function "is_disk_image" on line 45 of

On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 15:43 +0200, Sjors Gielen wrote: > Package: xen-utils-4.1 > Version: 4.1.4-3+deb7u1 > Severity: important > > When an LVM LV that serves as the root disk for a Xen DomU contains a boot > loader (or possibly other data) in its volume boot record, pygrub fails to boot > it, printing "Error: boot loader didn't return any data" before exiting.

Hello, I am fixing up a system for someone and they did not make a separate partition for /tmp...but I want to make it noexec, nosuid. I came across a site that said I could skip all the mount/unmount and new partition stuff (which would probably include downsizing a lvm to make room for it)... by adding this in fstab /tmp /tmp bind nosuid,noexec,bind 0 0 and then reboot... There is

Hello Hendrik Can you help input 2 commands 'mount' and 'df -TPh' on OMV, and post the output to us, thank you. -- Regards, Jones Syue | ??? QNAP Systems, Inc.

Am 24.05.2017 um 17:50 schrieb Jeremy Allison via samba: > Here are some mitigation techniques from Red Hat in > case servers cannot be patched immediately: > 2. Mount the filessytem which is used by samba for its writeable share, > using "noexec" option. I would have expected this to be standard security precaution on all pure file servers (which is probably the most

Hello, I've been playing a bit with the "noexec" flag for filesystems. It can represent a substantial obstacle against the exploitation of security holes. However, I think it's not perfect yet. First thing, an attempt to execute a program from a noexec-mounted filesystem should be logged. It is either a very significant security event, or it can drive nuts an

Does mounting /tmp as noexec,nosuid break anything in CentOS 5? I've been in solaris land forever and a day and this is a pretty standard security measure. I noticed CentOS comes default mounting /tmp with both those options allowed.. I'm getting constant php hack attacks against (mostly script kiddie level stuff right now) my server and will rest much easier with this setting in place..

I have several CentOS5 hosts in a VMware ESX 3.5.0 226117 environment using iSCSI storage. Recently we've begun to experience journal aborts resulting in remounted-read-only filesystems as well as other filesystem issues - I can unmount a filesystem and force a check with "fsck -f" and occasionally find errors. I've found -

i'm experimenting with some basic removable media mounting exercises for an upcoming class, and i read that, while you can use gconf-editor to change some of the mount options in cases like that, there is no way to override the mount options of nodev, noexec and nosuid. for example, that claim is made here (admittedly for fedora, but it appears to be true for centos as well):

Hey, I am trying to upgrade my kickstart usb key to 6.0 and I ran into a few issues. I boot with: ? append initrd=initrd.img ks=hd:sdb2:/ks.cfg repo=hd:sdb2:/centos and in the ks.cfg I have: ? harddrive --partition=sdb2 --dir=/centos and on sdb2 I have: ? sdb2:/centos/CentOS-6.0-x86_64-bin-DVD1.iso ? sdb2:/centos/CentOS-6.0-x86_64-bin-DVD2.iso It fails from the beginning unless I add /images

Hi, I'm about to get a linux vps server and I wanna install wine on it. The ohst is offering me these OS : Cent OS Fedora Debian I want to run some windows image converters on it. (It's tested it will work) I wanted to know which OS I must choose to have the fastest and smoothest performance with Wine. Thanks for your time

Hi all, We are using Samba 2.0.0beta5 on HP-UX 10.20 systems. We also use encryption and password checking on the NT 4 boxes. Everything works fine except for a few persons. When connecting to a samba share from an NT 4 client they get "unexpected network error". The contents of the last part of the samba log file are: [1999/06/01 16:04:45, 0] rpc_parse/parse_net.c:(1023) PANIC:

hi all! back in Aug several of you assisted me in solving a problem where one of my drives had dropped out of (or been kicked out of) the raid1 array. something vaguely similar appears to have happened just a few mins ago, upon rebooting after a small update. I received four emails like this, one for /dev/md0, one for /dev/md1, one for /dev/md125 and one for /dev/md126: Subject: DegradedArray

Doing this would reliably fail with -EBUSY for me: # mount /dev/sdb2 /mnt/scratch; umount /mnt/scratch; mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb2 ... unable to open /dev/sdb2: Device or resource busy because mkfs.btrfs tries to open the device O_EXCL, and somebody still has it. Using systemtap to track bdev gets & puts shows a kworker thread doing a blkdev put after mkfs attempts a get; this is left over

Hello everybody, I been trying to debug a problem for a month now and can use some insights and advice. This is the setup, I got two linux ha storage node providing iscsi disk, the disks is mounted on two linux kvm host and one backup server. The iscsi disk has lvm on it, the logical volume groups are visible on all servers. On the backup server I have the following running: # guestmount

Hi, I am trying to install Xen/Xenolinux v1.1 on my workstation which has 2 SCSI disks. The first disk has WinXP installed, and the second disk has Redhat 8.0. I copied the images into /boot and modified grub.conf accordingly: title Xen / XenoLinux 2.4.22 root (hd1,0) kernel /xen.gz dom0_mem=131072 ser_baud=115200 noht noreboot module /xenolinux.gz root=/dev/sdb2 ro