similar to: RSpec 0.6.0

We''ve released RSpec 0.6.4. Check it out! Check it out! Release info: http://rubyforge.org/frs/shownotes.php?release_id=7178 General info: http://rspec.rubyforge.org/ Questions? Right here! Enjoy, David

Hi all, I released RSpec 0.7.4 yesterday, and by now the gems should have rsync''ed to all the mirrors. This release features a complete redesign of the reports generated with --format html. You can see some examples of it here: http://rspec.rubyforge.org/report.html http://rspec.rubyforge.org/tools/failing_examples.html As usual there are many bug fixes - mostly related to spec/rails.

RSpec-0.7.1 is now available. It comprises some bug fixes and a couple of new features. This is recommended for anybody who has already upgraded to 0.7.0. If you are running 0.6.x (or earlier), read this first: http://rspec.rubyforge.org/upgrade.html Install gem: gem install rspec Download: http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=797 Release Notes:

Hi all Go grab the latest release of RSpec (gem install rspec). It has 9 bug fixes and some extra features, most notably a working rails_spec_runner, which allows you to run your Rails specs *fast*. Release notes: http://rubyforge.org/frs/shownotes.php?release_id=6590 Cheers, The RSpec team

Hi all... After a few months of slumber, I''ve booted mongrel_cluster out the door. Nothing is really new from the prereleases except some bug fixes. I imagine there will still be some issues with ''ps'' on non-Linux platforms. I''ll gladly take patches. Most of the new stuff is described here: http://rubyforge.org/frs/shownotes.php?release_id=12907 Let me

Hi wxRuby 1.9.5 is now out with a full set of binary gems. It can be downloaded from the usual place: http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=35&release_id=19932 Or via rubygems: gem install wxruby == WHAT''S NEW == This doesn''t have any major new features, but has a lot of bugfixes, including some nasty crashers, and additional useful methods within existing classes. It

The RMagick 2.0.0 beta release has been available for about a month now (http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=12). If you''ve installed it please let me know what your experience has been. I need to hear from users who have had a successful experience before I feel okay about promoting this to production status. Post a note on the RMagick forum at RubyForge

To help the bug list out I'm about to update wine from *20050830 <http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=353003> to **20050930 <http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=360902> . My concerns here is that I do this correctly to ensure I get a helpful result, but : 1. I have BricsCAD for Linux installed and know that if I go for a clean install

== NOW A new version of fastthread, the library providing better implementations of the classes in thread.rb, has been released. Please note that fastthread is only for Ruby 1.8, not JRuby or any other Ruby implementation (most of them don''t need it anyway!). == WHY The existing implementation of Mutex, Queue, etc. in thread.rb is slow. fastthread''s is faster (and bypasses

The biggest change is simplified rails support in a new wrapping. See release notes and website for details: http://rubyforge.org/frs/shownotes.php?release_id=6247 http://rspec.rubyforge.org/tools/rails.html Aslak

SwitchTower is a utility that can execute commands in parallel on multiple servers. It allows you to define tasks, which can include commands that are executed on the servers. You can also define roles for your servers, and then specify that certain tasks apply only to certain roles. Manual: http://manuals.rubyonrails.org/read/book/17 Project:

SwitchTower is a utility that can execute commands in parallel on multiple servers. It allows you to define tasks, which can include commands that are executed on the servers. You can also define roles for your servers, and then specify that certain tasks apply only to certain roles. It was developed primarily to ease the pain of deploying Rails applications to multiple machines, but can

Hi all! ...As I'm the author of http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=190646 http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=80408 (for Steven: these two links are for the SAME file...) ...I'd like to say some comments, to let you understand what the peculiarities of my approch are... My approach is more minimalistic: etherboot have already the capabilities to

Howdy, I have emailed before about the inconsistencies I''m spotting when using named routes/resource, but I think I''ve narrowed down the issue. It would seem this has nothing to do with rspec per se, but more with how routing works with rails. If you have an object instance, that isn''t saved and you attempt to generate a path for that item, even though the item may

rspec''ers I''ve committed numerous changes relating to dots, underscores, and mocks. This code will break your specs that use dots (with a couple of exceptions noted below), so you''ll have to change the dots to underscores if you''ve been using them. Feel free to check out the trunk, run it against your existing specs and report back any problems other than

The RSpec Development Team is pleased to announce the release of RSpec 0.7.5. This release adds support for Heckle - Seattle''rb''s code mutation tool. There are also several bug fixes to the RSpec core and the RSpec on Rails plugin. Changes: http://rspec.rubyforge.org/changes.html Download: http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=797 or gem install rspec Happy spec''ing,

I am happy to announce the release of Python-Markdown 2.0 final. We have versions for Python 2.3-2.6 and Python 3.0! See the release notes here: https://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=674043&group_id=153041 Download from PyPI here: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Markdown/2.0 -- ---- \X/ /-\ `/ |_ /-\ |\| Waylan Limberg

Hi, I''ve been reading with interest the threads trying to integrate Mocha and Stubba with RSpec. So far, I''ve made the two changes in spec_helper.rb suggested, but discovered another one that neither of the archives mentions: If you use traditional mocking: object = mock or the stub shortcut : object = stub(:method => :result), you run into namespace conflicts with

FYI - Jim Weirich just released an rspec-compatible version of FlexMock. For those of you using trunk, you can now use either FlexMock, Mocha, or RSpec''s built-in mocking framework by saying: Spec::Runner.configure do |config| config.mock_with :flexmock # or :mocha or :rspec (default) end The choice is yours. Mock in peace. Cheers, David ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From:

Hi all, I am trying to use rspec_on_rails in a Rails app that doesn''t have a database. so far I have just been faking it out by dumping in a sqlite3 database just to make Rails happy. I was using for test::unit a rake task that eliminated the calls to database prep: # Added this .rake file to keep Rake happy without a database. # Remove once a database is in the picture.