similar to: Dead easy Watir AND Selenium

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "Dead easy Watir AND Selenium"

2007 May 09
4
UI testing framework? (w/o selenium)
Hey all, I am currently working on coming up w/ an easy to use, developer-centric web testing framework to test a J2EE app with. (I have 3 rails apps in production, love rspec, and am currently at a java shop). I''ve looked at selenium, and it just doesn''t seem like it is ready for prime time, and the target audience is developers. So, having said that, does the rspec
2006 May 17
1
Functionnal testing : Watir vs Selenium
Hello, I wonder if some of you have evaluated these two solutions and how they compares each other. What did you liked or disliked ? And may be are you aware of others functionnal testing tools usable with and integrated with Ruby ? Thanks -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2007 Jan 12
5
Integration Testing - Wait, Watir, or Selenium
I''m evaluating what to use for integration testing: SafariWatir - integrates nicely with RSpec - doesn''t work with Ajax because of Safari event firing issues Selenium - Works with Ajax - doesn''t integrate with RSpec What is the best guess timeframe for RSpec integration testing? Will it be able to test Ajax application in the early iterations? Thanks, Brian Yamabe
2008 Jun 09
6
Selenium/Watir usage along side Webrat in story testing
This is related to Selenium/Watir usage along side webrat in story testing. MHS_Testing and Rspec-ui provide some great help for testing through frameworks like Selenium/Watir. But there is something missing, Webrat has changed the landscape somewhat with Acceptance Tests/Story Driven development. Now I have a choice: 1. Tests and rails process run as one test process (Webrat) 2. Use
2006 Feb 09
1
Alternative take on Selenium in Rails
Hey there, There''s been a bit of work going on with Selenium and Rails recently, so I thought I may as well share what I came up with. Check out my blog post at http://blog.viney.net.nz/articles/2006/02/09/selenium-testing, grab the plugin and give it a whirl (be sure to read the README!). Basically, my approach was to make it possible to write Selenium tests in the same way that
2006 Feb 19
0
Selenium testing plugin
Greetings, I''ve just finished a new release of my Selenium testing plugin with much tighter integration to rails. The rake selenium step has been removed as all tests are now live (just save your test file and refresh the browser). Install it with: script/plugin install http://svn.viney.net.nz/things/rails/plugins/selenium_testing And check out the readme:
2006 Oct 30
1
domain language?
RSpeckers: I went with RSpec instead of Systir because I downloaded and installed the former first. (I know that''s not exactly a ringing endorsement! ;-) I want to compete with FIT and Fitnesse, like this: http://www.zeroplayer.com/cgi-bin/wiki?TestFlea#tropism (Click on a Green Bar to distend one test case.) I want a domain-specific language in the parchment-colored area on the
2008 Sep 29
3
rspec-ui overlap with cucumber?
Hi! I''m using cucumber + selenium and I love it. However I''m looking to add some methods (example: click_and_wait etc) to the lib. Therefore looked around a bit and I got two questions: Firstly about rspec-ui, I''m a little confused, does rspec-ui overlap with its propose with webrat with cucumber or I''m missing a point? Secondly, are there any plans to
2008 Aug 20
9
I want RSpec for CSS layout.
I don''t even know how it''d be possible (through Selenium?), but I want it. I want to see if my stupid CSS hacks break. I want to say: describe "#nav-column" do body = something("#body-column") it "should line up at the top" do dom[:top].should_be == body.dom[:top] end it "should always be to the right" do
2006 Oct 16
2
subject.should_be true
As things stand now, the following will all pass: true.should_be true "true".should_be true "false".should_be true 3.should_be true etc My feeling is that "should_be true" should only pass if it returns boolean true even though ruby says that non-nil/non-false is true. Anybody else? David
2006 Oct 17
0
new handling of equality
All, Based mostly on the earlier thread on "should_be", we have introduced a new branch called should_be_working_like_ruby with the new proposed handling for equality. Per the CHANGES file in that branch (rev 896): ============================================ IMPORTANT NOTE: THIS RELEASE IS NOT 100% BACKWARDS COMPATIBLE TO 0.6.x This release changes the way RSpec handles equality.
2006 Sep 06
1
support for arbitrary comparisons
Mike Williams contributed a patch to support arbitrary comparisons. This is now in the trunk and will be part of the next release. So you will now be able to do this: result.should_be < 5 result.should_be >= 7 It also supports alternate syntax for should_be, should_match result.should == 3 result.should =~ /regex/ Personally, I prefer should_be and should_match in these cases, as I think
2006 Nov 19
2
underscores, sugar, and more and more bugs
I sent this earlier under with the subject "artificial sugar causes cancer" and I think some spam filters ate it. Here it is again: ====================================== All, If you look at http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=6760&group_id=797&atid=3149 you''ll see that Chad (the submitter) found the source of the bug. Unfortunately, the source
2007 Apr 12
2
Watir on firefox
Hello is there any way through which we can run watir on forfox if so please reply me with example Thanks -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to
2006 Sep 06
0
RSpec and Watir
Hi all, (Sorry for cross-posting - please reply to only one list, preferrably wtr-general) I just started on a project where it looks like we might start using Watir. I just whipped up a little example and some doco about how to (and why) use RSpec with Watir. It''s in RSpec''s subversion under trunk/vendor/watir http://rubyforge.org/scm/?group_id=797
2008 Oct 16
2
Any good conferences this year about ruby/rspec/watir?
Hello. Sorry for this little offtopic question, but I was wondering if anyone happens to know if there''s any good conferences coming up about rspec or ruby or watir in this year where I could attend to? Or any good website where such things are listed or something similar. All suggested conferences should not take place before one month from now (employer needs some time to get good
2008 Jan 15
1
Converting Watir script to Mechanize
I have a Watir script that I would like to convert to a Mechanize script. The watir code looks like this require ''watir'' include Watir def test ie = IE.new ie.goto(''http://cpref.gsm.com/inter.asp?r=8084'') ie.text_field(:name, ''inter_string'').set(''Potassium'') ie.button(:id, ''image1'').click
2006 Nov 19
6
artificial sugar causes cancer
All, If you look at http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=6760&group_id=797&atid=3149 you''ll see that Chad (the submitter) found the source of the bug. Unfortunately, the source of *this* bug is the *solution* to a *previous bug* in which Rails was replacing RSpec''s method missing with its own. When we settled on underscores, my one reservation was
2006 Oct 17
0
actual.should != not_expected
All, In dealing with the changes to should in the should_be_working_like_ruby branch, I am reminded that while we got the following to work ... actual.should_be < value actual.should_be <= value actual.should == value actual.should =~ value actual.should_be >= value actual.should_be > value ... we were not able to get this to work: actual.should != value Here''s what the
2011 Jul 21
0
Is it possible to open particular version of browser using Watir?
Dear all: I installed *Utilu Firefox Collection *which has all the versions of the Firefox. After installation when I run my Watir script then FF version 2 is getting opened and my scripts are not working. My question is, is it possible to open particular browser version using Watir? I am using Watir-webdrivers. Thanks and Regards, Amit -- You received this message because you are subscribed