similar to: GIT issues today?

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 04:54:53PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Michal Hocko wrote: > > No way. This is just wrong! First of all, you will explode most likely > > on many allocations of small sizes. Second, CONFIG_DEBUG_VM tends to be > > enabled quite often. > > You're an evil person who doesn't want to fix bugs. Steady on. There's

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 04:54:53PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Michal Hocko wrote: > > No way. This is just wrong! First of all, you will explode most likely > > on many allocations of small sizes. Second, CONFIG_DEBUG_VM tends to be > > enabled quite often. > > You're an evil person who doesn't want to fix bugs. Steady on. There's

I described this off-list to Zac, but for anyone else who is following, simply specifying the target triple is not enough to have the build system set an older macOS deployment target. I.e the 6.0.0-rc1 binaries I've just uploaded have the same deployment target problem. Looking at the 5.0.0 and 6.0.0-rc1 binaries, I can confirm that their deployment target was too new: Load command 9

The past few packages on http://releases.llvm.org/download.html for mac have required the latest version of mac os. Previously they were built for 10.5 (I believe). I was just wondering if there is a technical reason for this change in requirements and if not, if it could be revered. I have systems I actively use which are 10.10 and 10.11 and it would be awesome if I didn't have to build

How is -mmacosx-version-min=10.9 being set? LLVM_COMPILE_FLAGS? Or CMAKE_CXX_COMPILE? > On May 2, 2018, at 19:22, Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I described this off-list to Zac, but for anyone else who is following, simply specifying the target triple is not enough to have the build system set an older macOS deployment target. I.e the 6.0.0-rc1

Hi Zac, Thanks for the heads-up. I've started targeting a minimum macOS deployment target of 10.9 for the release binaries. Hope this helps. Let me know if there are any issues. vedant > On May 1, 2018, at 4:13 PM, Zac Hansen via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > The past few packages on http://releases.llvm.org/download.html

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 05:21:26PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 04:54:53PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > > On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > No way. This is just wrong! First of all, you will explode most likely > > > > on many allocations of small sizes. Second,

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 05:21:26PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 04:54:53PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > > On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > No way. This is just wrong! First of all, you will explode most likely > > > > on many allocations of small sizes. Second,

Quoting Joseph Tam <jtam.home at gmail.com>: > Another privacy plugin that assumes the server operator is unmotivated or > respects your privacy anyways, and won't just skim your password right off > the top to look at your mail. A vault with steel walls and a dirt floor. *SIGH* As usual, you're right on the money, Joseph. I used to let things like this

Hi, I'm searching for "virtualization options". I already take a look on VMware, but it needs too much MS software to work for my needs. Citrix needs less, but the key validation is still MS-AD. Now I'm taking a look at RHEV... and run into Oracle VM! Somebody had already take a look at Oracle VM? We need in primary a solid VM solution for an "enterprise

Hi, I am trying to clone the samba repository using git and I get the following error. $ git-clone git://git.samba.org/samba.git samba Initialized empty Git repository in /data/koteswar/samba/.git/ git.samba.org[0: 131.204.22.100]: errno=Connection refused fatal: unable to connect a socket (Connection refused) fetch-pack from 'git://git.samba.org/samba.git' failed. Can you please

Hi, Which of the various Wine downloads on the download page should I get for PCLinuxOS? Thanks. Stephen Carter

So, will Wine 1.0 be released today as outlined in the release plan? http://wiki.winehq.org/WineReleasePlan

"Google: Evil or Not?" is my first Rails webapp and I''ve just made it public at http://evilornot.info Do you still believe the ?Do no evil? Google mantra? Do you think Google Book Search, the AOL deal, and Larry and Sergey?s 767 point to Google losing it?s pristine morality and turning over to the dark side? Now you can discover what the world thinks and contribute your

Hi I have installed a plug-in an antispam and when I try to move the message to a folder a spam mutt produces an error "Failed to call dspam." Here's my configuration(all built from ports): dovecot 1.2.11 dovecot-antispam 1.2_4,1 dspam 3.9.0_1 FreeBSD 8.0 Relevant sections from dovecot.conf: protocol imap { mail_plugins = antispam ... } plugin { antispam_signature =

Until a couple of days ago, I could look in the AppDB like in a tree from category to category and I had the name of the application IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER. Now there is some field to click, search by rating .etc but if I want to find my application, I have to go through 200 applications rated by last entries. I seriously don't find anything anymore? Is it a change to make use of the google

​No, sorry, it's actually failing on "configure" which this script calls. I should have been more clear. ./configured is failing at step: ​*Checking uname sysname type* It's obviously missing some app/header/library, but reading through all the breakpoints listed in the error (re-pasted below) I can't make out from the code what it's looking for, and the config.log

Hi all, Since the vault for 7.3.1611 has been cleared out last sunday (20170207) - why is that? - I'm using git to download a "SRPM", or more accurately, its contents. However, using git has one major drawback: It is missing checksums for the files. Are there any plans to provide checksums for the files in git so I can be sure that what I download is actually not tampered with?

As of about 11:25, the command "git pull" produces only a timeout error, as follows: source.winehq.org[0: 209.46.25.134]: errno=Connection timed out fatal: unable to connect a socket (Connection timed out) Susan

Zac, Thanks for the input. This would cover it, however it is not stealth. In some cases, you may want it to be stealth. Again, my state allows me to do this, but some states do not. I've done a little searching and could not find an answer. Basically, to simplify the question: When is it legal to record interstate calls without giving notice, when the recording party is in a one-party