similar to: No subject

Dee Ayy wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 1:08 AM, vitamin <wineforum-user at winehq.org> wrote: > Code like what you posted works. > What does not work apparently is tee and 3>&1 1>&2 2>&3 > > Yes there were bugs and something I don't understand. > 1) My logic bug: There was no need to call the following before my > code block -- I thought I was

I'm receiving the following error in a custom app: err:ntdll:RtlpWaitForCriticalSection section 0x110048 "heap.c: main process heap section" wait timed out in thread 001a, blocked by 001c, retrying (60 sec) wine: Critical section 00110048 wait failed at address 0x7bc3ad00 (thread 001a), starting debugger... err:ntdll:RtlpWaitForCriticalSection section 0x110048 "heap.c: main

Hello, I'm trying to make a function for using wine_get_unix_file_name in VB6 programs. Private Declare Function lstrcpyA Lib "kernel32.dll" (ByVal lpString1 As String, ByVal lpString2 As Long) As Long Public Declare Function GetProcessHeap Lib "kernel32" () As Long Public Declare Function HeapFree Lib "kernel32" (ByVal hHeap As Long, ByVal dwFlags As

This was an error I got when running a self-installing executable, power-structure-demo.exe, available from www.write-brain.com (a demo for Power Structure). A error box appears with title SHRINKER.ERR and message: (path)\power-structure-demo.exe (3.4) (time&date) - Pager initialisation error 2 - File not found and then the program quits. Running with --debugmsg

Dee Ayy wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:44 AM, vitamin <wineforum-user at winehq.org> wrote: > > > Try: > > > > Code: > > $ wine cmd > > c:> echo "some stuff" | myexe > > > > Interesting way to run wine. However, I get the same response. Then either your program is buggy or Wine's cmd doesn't fully implement what

A question for the WineLib guru's :) I am using the wine-20011108 build with Mandrake 8.0 and with this version of wine clean compiled and installed I can run several windows programs very successfully :). Then I use winemaker to create a WineLib 'so' file and the compile and link again runs clean. But when I run the resulting 'so' file using this command line: $

Trying to debug starcraft.exe I put on --debugmsg trace+all as part of the wine options: WINEPREFIX=~/.wine.starcraft/ wine --debugmsg trace+all -desktop 640x480 /mnt/d/Games/Starcraft/starcraft.exe Wine is cvs version from march 21. This is the last 20-30 lines from the debug log: trace:profile:PROFILE_GetWineIniString ('wine','temp','c:\windows'): returning

Hi, I was building LLVM with gcc 6.1.1 recently and it was spitting out some warnings relating to misleading indention that caught my eye. This wasn't a fresh build so I may have missed some. I've CC'ed the authors of the potentially misleading lines so they can decide what do about the warnings (if anything). I'm wondering if clang-format is making some inappropriate choices

Hello! When my application opens a URL in Firefox with more than 257 characters, the URL is truncated and the message below. "Err: psdrv: PSDRV_PPDGetNextTuple Line too long." I noted that this limitation may be due to the following code. See line 00363. Code: 00354 /********************************************************************* 00355 * 00356 *

Hi, here is the debuginfo for the above message, which occured during a creation of a window. Hopefully somebody can tell me how to overcome this trouble. Thanks in advance Hans -------------- next part -------------- Ret user32.621: UnregisterClassA() retval=00000001 ret=61ed29cb fs=008f Call kernel32.949: lstrlenA(61ed91b4 "Centura:ChildTable") ret=61ed29d2 fs=008f Ret

Hello Everyone, I want to raise a discussion about @llvm.experimental.guard intrinsic and reasons why we should give up using it. Here is an alternative approach to representation of guards that resolves some of fundamental flaws that the current guards have. Basically, this intrinsic was introduced to model the following situation: we want to check that some condition is true, and if it's

On Hexagon, unguarded loops cannot be converted to hardware loops. If the loop's latch branch alone handles the iteration count, including the possibility of 0, then the loop cannot be converted to a hardware loop, because hardware loops must iterate at least once. If the entire loop is guarded against zero iteration count, we can put the loop setup in the preheader, since at that point the

Hi Sanjoy, Thanks for feedback! As for memory effects, currently I use " inaccessiblememonly " for it. It allows to prove that it doesn't alias with any other load/store in the function, but doesn't allow CSE to eliminate it. It is not actually super-cool, because there is no way that we can safely hoist it out of loop (and sometimes we want to, for example to make unswitching).

Quoting Uwe Bonnes <bon@elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de>: > Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov@syntrex.com> wrote: > :> > :> Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov@syntrex.com> wrote: > :> : fixme:msvcrt:MSVCRT_signal (11 (nil)):stub > :> It seems to me like you are using builtin MSVCRT. Signal Handling is > broken > :> there. If the programm uses signal handling, it

The man page gives this example, however, when I attempt to use it, it ssems to block the whole set? Could someone tell me what's going wrong here please. Thanks heaps.. This works, ${fwcmd} add deny log all from any to 203.1.96.1 in via ${oif} This blocks the whole IP block, not just the list? ${fwcmd} add deny log all from any to 203.1.96.0/24{2,6-25,27-154,156-19

Hi all, TL;DR: Should the loop guard branch be part of the canonical loop structure? Background: ----------- While working on the next set of improvements to loop fusion, we discovered that loop rotation will put a guard around a loop if it cannot prove the loop will execute at least once, as seen in the following (simplified) example: entry: br i1 %cmp1, label %for.body.lr.ph, label

Hi again! > I have excellent success with the tiny "fcpci" and chan_capi, which is > also working great with capi4hylafax. See > net-dialup/fcpci-0.1-r1 in gentoo (should not be difficult to use this > on other distros, but I have never done so). Do not confuse this with > the "fritzcapi"! I managed to install fcpci and it seems to run fine (capiinfo

This patch adds a per-node bucket to the heap structure in Xen. During heap initialization the patch determines which bucket to place the memory. We reserve guard pages between node boundaries in the case that said boundary isn''t already guarded by the MAX_ORDER boundary to prevent the buddy allocator from merging pages between nodes. -- Ryan Harper Software Engineer; Linux Technology

Subject: Re: [R] Problems with R Commander version 1.8-3 Many thanks for your kindly replay. I just use a At this time I use an earlier version of the package. I try to install the Rcmdr from R-Forge. Many tanks again Message: 21 Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:04:09 -0400 From: "John Fox" <jfox at mcmaster.ca> To: <petretta at unina.it> Cc: r-help at r-project.org

On Feb 7, 2013, at 8:40 AM, Michele Scandale <michele.scandale at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for your reply. > > Maybe it wasn't so clear, but the optimization I'm writing is target-dependent > and so it's declared inside the target backend and is run after the independent > optimizer. So I cannot run my pass just after LoopRotate and before InstCombine. > I