similar to: Is wine logo (at winehq.com) and other winehq site arts GPL licensed?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Is wine logo (at winehq.com) and other winehq site arts GPL licensed?"

2019 May 22
0
[centos/centos.org] branch master updated: Modified eukhost.com logo
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. unknown user pushed a commit to branch master in repository centos/centos.org. The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: new e94df72 Modified eukhost.com logo e94df72 is described below commit e94df7271bffc18e2b3bf6ae09e01886c5a39223 Author: Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org>
2018 Sep 18
0
[CentOS-devel] Authorization to use CentOS logo in GNOME Boxes
Karsten, On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 7:45 PM, Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > Thanks Rich for drawing this forward, I had missed it. (I generally > handle all the trademark usage queries.) > > The key reference is this one, the trademark guidelines: > > https://www.centos.org/legal/trademarks/ > > That document should give the GNOME project all of the
2005 Jun 10
0
RE: xen, xensource, community, logo, wiki and licencing (Was: Re: Copyright Question (Logo))
> I think Philipp raised an interesting question, as I was also > willing to use the logo as a basis for a community site logo. > > This makes me ask a more general question on Intellectual Property : > Xen''s source code is clearly under GPL, but logo, > documentation and even the yet-to-be-official wiki have no > mention of licence, owner nor of usage rights
2018 Oct 31
0
[CentOS-devel] Authorization to use CentOS logo in GNOME Boxes
Hi all, There is now a draft permission letter working it's way through the CentOS Board. It is intended to cover permission for just the GNOME Project's use with GNOME Boxes. I am still pursuing resolving this within the guidelines, that will take more time. Best regards, - Karsten On 10/16/2018 07:10 AM, Fabiano Fid?ncio wrote: > People, > > On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 09:28
2018 Oct 31
1
[CentOS-devel] Authorization to use CentOS logo in GNOME Boxes
Karsten, On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:06 PM Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > There is now a draft permission letter working it's way through the > CentOS Board. It is intended to cover permission for just the GNOME > Project's use with GNOME Boxes. This is *really* good news! > > I am still pursuing resolving this within the
2014 Nov 18
1
Logo Nouveau
On 18/11/14 00:18, Christian Costa wrote: > Hi Valeria, > > Very nice logo! Nice job! I like the ideas and the font. :) > Just few remarks about the visual appearance: > - A horizontally centered penguin would be better as the left part of > the "n" appears thiner than the right one > - The bottom line of the "e" appears a little short to me > >
2009 Jul 30
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM Logo
Albert Graef wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: >> I'm happy to announce that Apple has agreed to let llvm.org (and >> anyone else) use the great LLVM logo they designed for WWDC. If >> you're interested, you can see the full version of the logo on this >> page: >> http://llvm.org/Logo.html > > Looks cool! > > I'm awful at this kind of
2018 Sep 19
0
[CentOS-devel] Authorization to use CentOS logo in GNOME Boxes
El 18/9/18 a las 20:07, Karsten Wade escribi?: > On 09/18/2018 11:03 AM, Fabiano Fid?ncio wrote: >> My understanding is that we can use all the CentOS marks provided here[0]. >> However, those unfortunately are not looking good enough on Boxes and >> we'd like to use, if possible, just the logo as in here[1] >> >> Would that be possible? As far as I could
2018 Sep 18
0
[CentOS-devel] Authorization to use CentOS logo in GNOME Boxes
Bumping this thread in the hopes that we can get an official opinion from someone on the board. In particular, the guidelines at https://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/Brand/Logo seem to indicate that we're not supposed to use the logo without the wordmark, but we do that all the time, even on official swag. What's the official ruling, and who can we go to for further clarification? --Rich
2014 Nov 18
1
Logo Nouveau
On 17.11.2014 21:55, Martin Peres wrote: > I would like to address here the "BSD not wanted" argument that seems to > be implied by having a Penguin in the logo: > - Nouveau does not currently run on any other kernel but Linux. I know > that the BSDs are interested in porting Nouveau to their OS and I'm > happy they are doing so, but I do not think any real development
2006 Jun 14
2
Would Xiph be interested in a logo redesign for Vorbis?
So, in a thread on HA a user asked if some logo was the official one for Vorbis. It turned out not to be, but everyone agreed the official logo was ugly and a bad idea to add on any portable player compilant with Vorbis (or other Ogg media for that matter). The chaps, me included, started a discussion of a redesign, but truth be told, if Xiph isn't interested in a redesign, there's no
2015 Aug 30
2
[OT] new R logo in vector graphics format
L.S. Since some time there is a new r-project.org site as announced here: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-announce/2015/000581.html The logo has changed on the site, but I fail to find a vector graphics file. For the previous logo I used to go to https://svn.r-project.org/R-dev-web/trunk/Logo/ Is there anything similar for the new logo? Many thanks in advance. Kind regards, Tobias --
2009 Jul 30
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM Logo
Chris Lattner wrote: > I'm happy to announce that Apple has agreed to let llvm.org (and > anyone else) use the great LLVM logo they designed for WWDC. If > you're interested, you can see the full version of the logo on this > page: > http://llvm.org/Logo.html Looks cool! I'm awful at this kind of stuff, but maybe someone could do a small version of this with
2009 Sep 23
2
Images don't resolve on ArtWork/Logo
Hey While trying to get some svg files of the CentOS logo I found that [1] can't load the images. The urls are : http://gideon.nyarna.com/artwork/centos-new-2.png http://gideon.nyarna.com/artwork/centos-logo-3.png http://files.squirtgun.ca//CentOS/images/logos/centosLogoRound_v001.jpg Maybe someone can fix this. [1] http://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/Logo Cheers Didi ---- My www page:
2014 Nov 17
0
Logo Nouveau
On 16/11/14 21:03, valeria aguilera wrote: > Dear community members, > > Im a graphic designer and for the last couple of months I have been > working on a new logo for the Nouveau project. After sending > preliminary designs to both Martin Peres and Ilia Mirkin, we have > decided to share the logo in order to gather your feedback. > > I would like to highlight that the
2014 Nov 17
0
Logo Nouveau
Hi Valeria, Very nice logo! Nice job! I like the ideas and the font. :) Just few remarks about the visual appearance: - A horizontally centered penguin would be better as the left part of the "n" appears thiner than the right one - The bottom line of the "e" appears a little short to me Thanks Christian Le 16/11/2014 21:03, valeria aguilera a écrit : > > > Dear
2009 Jul 30
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM Logo
On Jul 30, 2009, at 12:09 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm happy to announce that Apple has agreed to let llvm.org (and > anyone else) use the great LLVM logo they designed for WWDC. If > you're interested, you can see the full version of the logo on this > page: > http://llvm.org/Logo.html > > I personally think that this is a pretty great
2018 Jun 18
0
Logo colors added to wiki
Hi all: Since our designer friend Tuomas Kuosmanen (tigert) already did the hard work of specifying the CentOS logo colors in HEX, Pantone, and CMYK ... I did the small step of adding them to the wiki. This might be useful for you all to know it's now there: https://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/Brand/Logo#logo-colors Also, I put a link back to the trademark guidelines for questions that are
2004 Mar 29
3
logo
Dear all, I used R in my work and would like to put the logo of these program on the background of my presentation. But the logo that cames with the program is in low resolution. Does anyone have the R logo in high resolution? Thanks Cecília Shiraiwa [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2007 Jan 06
0
Logo Contest - Round 3
We've completed round 2, and even counting a couple of people who wished to change their votes, Who's logo came up about 8 votes short and will be eliminated. Once again we had great turnout. Please vote for one of the remaining 3 logos. And designers, please remember no further editing. Also, regarding a suggestion to include the current logo, it was not submitted for consideration