similar to: No subject

Hi List, As a ZFS newbie, I foolishly copied my data set to the root zpool file system (a large iSCSI SAN array). Thus: # zpool create -f iscsi c4t19d0 c4t20d0 c4t21d0 c4t22d0 c4t23d0 c4t24d0 # zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT iscsi 9.53T 64.5K 5.34T 0% ONLINE - # zfs set mountpoint=/mydisks/iscsi iscsi Then copied

(udp/5060, udp/2727, among others). One way to tell for sure would be to run 'lsof -i' which would show you the process associated with the port. As far as the call not reaching asterisk or being a firewall issue, one way to tell might be to start a tcpdump just prior to making the incoming call. Something like this: tcpdump -n 'port 5060' That would show the connection

I have set up a kvm host and configured a standard clone prototype for generating new guests. One persistent (pun intended) annoyance when cloning is the behaviour of udev with respect to the virtual network interface. The prototype is configured with just eth0 having a dedicated IP addr. When the prototype is cloned udev creates rules for both eth0 and eth1 in the clone. Because eth1 does not

I have set up a kvm host and configured a standard clone prototype for generating new guests. One persistent (pun intended) annoyance when cloning is the behaviour of udev with respect to the virtual network interface. The prototype is configured with just eth0 having a dedicated IP addr. When the prototype is cloned udev creates rules for both eth0 and eth1 in the clone. Because eth1 does not

Yes, I would hope that for most this boils down to cloning a different URL. Except for folks pushing patches to the test suite, I'm moderately confident there would be no other difference. It's the pushing patches side that would need to be sorted out in more detail. On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:48 AM Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com> wrote: > My biggest concerns and

Hello there, I have libvirt/kvm installed on a HP DL380 server and it seems to be cloning a template image very slowly, in fact a 50GB image just doesn't gets stuck after 7%. Is there a reason why this might be happening? I've tried the same setup on a desktop and never had this issue. The command and setup is listed below: virt-clone -o template.img -n new-clone -f .../new-clone.img

Hi Christian, gettwinegit-0001.sh works almost perfectly .... Every time I try to get a wine clone repository I get this message: error: Unable to get pack file http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git//objects/pack/pack-9cdf7885bd7aad70cde85ea0b0a0d4debe160b04.pack transfer closed with 100593012 bytes remaining to read Getting alternates list for

Thank you for your help. It's working now. I wasn't aware of the usefulness of the User class. The ValueMapper.cpp's "RemapInstruction()" also helped me a lot to remap phi nodes and metadatas. Thank you very much. 2012/6/21 Michael Ilseman <michael at lunarg.com> > Please reply-all so that the thread is kept on llvmdev. > > The LLVM Programmer's Manual

Thanks for sharing your take on this. (Sorry about likely mixing historic standards, was not in position to cross-check while posting) Just to clarify: using a different port *is* possible since forever, with `LISTEN host port` (as two arguments to the directive); the question was if having a way to spell it as one argument as `LISTEN host:port` would solve some shortcomings/ease adoption more

Thanks for sharing your take on this. (Sorry about likely mixing historic standards, was not in position to cross-check while posting) Just to clarify: using a different port *is* possible since forever, with `LISTEN host port` (as two arguments to the directive); the question was if having a way to spell it as one argument as `LISTEN host:port` would solve some shortcomings/ease adoption more

Sirs: I have a Ubuntu 6.06 samba 3.0.22 file server running on linux. I am attempting to update the file server to ubuntu 8.10, samba 3.2.3. I have been attempting this, intermittently, for some time which is why 8.10. I have 10 MSDOS (mostly 6.22) workstations as a part of the network. The ones that have to run, control production machinery on the plant floor. Updating the operating system on

Please reply-all so that the thread is kept on llvmdev. The LLVM Programmer's Manual has examples of how to iterate over many common structures, such as instructions in a basic block[1]. Other than that, you can check the source code or doxygen[2]. Basically, you loop over the instructions as detailed in the programmer's manual[1], and loop over the operands using User's

Hah! Woo is me you say... Have you ever stayed in a non-hilton hotel while traveling? I don't mean couch surfing, but just average place.. I'd even add some above average places to the list and when you get 100 people all on the same line.. it can get "slow"... Lets also factor in networking policies that favor normal internet traffic.. So they may allow youtube to stream like

Hi, Found CloneBasicBlock utility only does the cloning without any remapping. Consider below example: Input block: sw.epilog: ; preds = %sw.bb20, %sw.bb15, %sw.bb10, %sw.bb6, %sw.bb2, %sw.bb, %while.body, %if.end29 %no_final.1 = phi i32 [ %no_final.055, %while.body ], [ 1, %if.end29 ], [ %no_final.055, %sw.bb20 ], [ %no_final.055, %sw.bb15 ], [

Hey Johnny, thank you very much for your instructions. The build is running at the moment but there seems to be a small bug in kernel-rt.spec. I changed the line 684 from mv %{name}-%{rpmversion}-%{pkg_release_simple}%{dist} vanilla-%{kversion}; to mv %{name}-%{rpmversion}-%{pkg_release_simple}* vanilla-%{kversion}; The reason is that the tarball contains a folder with dist-tag .el7_2. So when

Hi list, I am still having troubles with rsync, as on large areas in our setup, it keeps dying unexpectedly. See my previous post two days ago for the initial tries. I realize it is a somewhat broad question, but how do I troubleshoot these disconnects? Im no great programmer, although we have a few good c programmers around, and if needed I can ask for their help. But for now, my thinking is,

On 02/05/2016 04:22 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/03/2016 10:23 AM, Tim wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> how can I install rpms from git.centos.org? I'd like to install and test >> the realtime-kernel. >> >> It seems to me that https://wiki.centos.org/Sources only means to build >> srpms. >> >> What I ned is an rt-kernel with headers for

Quote: RTFM - 'man 8 blazer'. Yes, yes!! im undestend and study the man!! snx!!

On 04/05/2018 08:32 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Sat, 2018-03-24 at 20:38 -0400, Ken McDonald via samba wrote: >>> By default, step 4 takes forever to run on large datasets because it >>> uses named entities. My ultimate plan was to use the numeric >>> user/group id's in that step instead of named ones so the Winbind cost >>> is not incurred. Seems for

>Oplock's tells the Windows Client he can cache the requestet file on >local machine. >Should the Client change the File (or another Client would do this) the >Lock must released by the first Client, or Samba break's the Lock after >a certain time he doesn't become the Lock back. > >When you take the Settings in your Share Section with the Database File, >then