similar to: Corsair Flash Voyager utility

Hi, First, many thanks for your great work. Don't know if it's the good way to post .... But I want to give you a good information ( and also good for me). I try to make an usb bootable SystemrescueCd (www.sysrescd.org) on a new 2Gb Usb Key (noname, UT163 controller from USBest) and it was impossible with syslinux 3.31 release ( using win32 version syslinux.exe). The syslinux command

This adds an smp_ops for voyager, and hooks things up appropriately. This is the first baby-step to making subarch runtime switchable. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xensource.com> Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> --- arch/i386/kernel/Makefile | 1 arch/i386/kernel/smp.c

This adds an smp_ops for voyager, and hooks things up appropriately. This is the first baby-step to making subarch runtime switchable. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xensource.com> Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> --- arch/i386/kernel/Makefile | 1 arch/i386/kernel/smp.c

Guys currently I am horrified by the ease at which I can find bugs in the pending paravirtualization patches. I have barely even looked at arch/i386 in the -mm tree and it feels like I am tripping over significant bugs left and right. Because no one has heeded my advice and put in a proper platform layer on arch/i386 and we are instead doing a half baked job with paravirt_ops it is still

Guys currently I am horrified by the ease at which I can find bugs in the pending paravirtualization patches. I have barely even looked at arch/i386 in the -mm tree and it feels like I am tripping over significant bugs left and right. Because no one has heeded my advice and put in a proper platform layer on arch/i386 and we are instead doing a half baked job with paravirt_ops it is still

On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:50, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Il 28/10/2016 16:28, Valeri Galtsev ha scritto: >> On Fri, October 28, 2016 2:42 am, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >> > Il 27/10/2016 19:38, Yamaban ha scritto: >> > > For my personal use I would replace that Drive asap. >> > > - There is no warranty for it anymore (time since buy) >> > > -

On Fri, October 28, 2016 11:50 am, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Il 28/10/2016 16:28, Valeri Galtsev ha scritto: >> >> On Fri, October 28, 2016 2:42 am, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >>> Il 27/10/2016 19:38, Yamaban ha scritto: >>>> For my personal use I would replace that Drive asap. >>>> - There is no warranty for it anymore (time since buy) >>>>

On Fri, October 28, 2016 2:42 am, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Il 27/10/2016 19:38, Yamaban ha scritto: >> For my personal use I would replace that Drive asap. >> - There is no warranty for it anymore (time since buy) >> - You can't buy it new anymore (discontinued) >> - There are more reliable drives available. >> >> I'd go for a Samsung Evo 850, that

Hello All. I have five Centos 4.4 x86_64 (amd fx-62) boxes with 4 gig of Corsair dual channel ram running kernel 2.6.9-42.0.10.EL (smp). The sixth box is the same except for video card and ram. It is using 8gig of GSkill dual channel ram and has a very cheap ATI video card in it. This box will segfault on boot unless I use noapic acpi=off and nolapic. Even with these boot params, the box is not

I have a pretty simply home LAN with a Linux box (Mandrake 9.1) and 2 XP boxes. The workgroup is named UNIVERSE and the machines are earth (Linux), voyager (XP) and starbase (XP). (smb.conf has security=user). Voyager can browse over to \\earth\share no problem. Recently I connected starbase to my LAN using a wireless router. When on starbase I cannot browse to \\earth\share. When I do so I

Anyone using the mobile IMAP option on the LG Voyager (mobile phone) with dovecot? I think it costs $5 extra per month. Seems low enough just to try it and find out. Thanks

I just rebased my paravirt_ops patch queue to current git. Looks like almost all the pre-req patches are now in, which is nice. The only missing thing from your patches was you sched_clock patches and the sched_clock paravirt-op. Are there still problems with either your sched_clock patch or the paravirt patch? Should I resubmit the paravirt-sched_clock patch based on git? The only other

I just rebased my paravirt_ops patch queue to current git. Looks like almost all the pre-req patches are now in, which is nice. The only missing thing from your patches was you sched_clock patches and the sched_clock paravirt-op. Are there still problems with either your sched_clock patch or the paravirt patch? Should I resubmit the paravirt-sched_clock patch based on git? The only other

Hi, I WAS experiencing a problem while attempting to boot Knoppix V5.0.1 off a USB key using SYSLINUX. Having almost sent the following text as a request for help I can now tag it as a solution! :) The USB drive is a Corsair Flash Voyager 1024 MB, with a 745 MB partition I'm trying (now succesfully) to use for the purpose of booting Knoppix. I've followed the instructions on this

Not strictly asterisk related, however... Here's an odd one for you.. I got a Nokia E90 and setup it's SIP client which runs via Wi-Fi (anyone know if I can make it work via GPRS/3G?) Anyway, in a fit of idleness, I thought I'd see what codecs it supports, as I couldn't find it in the manual... And it supports: ilbc g729 ulaw/alaw No GSM! How odd is that, given

I have a couple of Samba boxes, one of which is dedicated to WINS. The other I dole out anti-virus stuff to 3,500 odd PCs from. This second one will disappear from the WINS server from time to time which is a bit of a pain. I use nmblookup -R -U <wins_ip> <2nd_box_ip> to test for it. All clients are configured as "P" nodes so WINS is a bit essential. To bring it back I

I could use some input to point out the error in my configuration, which eludes me. Previously I operated a 225-node cluster with samba 4.3 and sssd on the Linux boxes. Everything worked OK. Now I am using samba 4.11.6 on CentOS 7.7, patched up to date. The DC, on a KVM VM, is the only node configured so far. I am using winbind in place of sssd (my first experience with winbind). BIND9_DLZ

Hello there, since kernel update 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6, one of my USB external SATA drives is not mounting. With kernel 2.6.32-131.21.1.el6, it auto-mounts in GNOME desktop when I plug the disk. When I plug the disk, this wakes it up and I see in /var/log/messages: kernel: usb 2-4.2: USB disconnect, address 11 kernel: usb 2-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 13 kernel: usb

On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 16:59 -0600, NightLightHosts Admin wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Ed Heron <Ed at heron-ent.com> wrote: > > Yes, but it isn't that simple. One copy of the mirror would be on a > > physical disk. The other copy of the mirror would be on RAM disk. > > Since data in RAM doesn't generally survive reboot, the RAM piece would >

Hi, Thanks for reading. I have recently started to try and get Windows 10 machines working with our Samba 4.3.3 domain controller and have run into a few issues with gpupdate /force The error given by Windows is “The processing of group policy failed. Windows attempted to read the file \\domain.com.au <smb://domain.com.au>” etc. Its interesting because access is denied with the file path