similar to: Using Ubuntu Packages for Debian

I uploaded packages of 1.0.17 to Debian unstable more than a month ago, and also updated the xapian-backports PPA on launchpad: https://launchpad.net/~xapian-backports/+archive/ppa But more recently and more notably, I've now uploaded backported packages for Debian 5.0 (the current stable release, codename lenny) and Debian 4.0 (the "oldstable" release, codename etch) to

Once again Debian has no updates. Is there any reason for this to happen? Jim -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-users/attachments/20080430/c39ba1e4/attachment.htm

Hi all, I've gotten asterisk installed on Debian only to realize that the packaged version is 1.0.7. Is there a reason why they're not up to a 1.2.x release? I'm building a system for production and I'm wondering if I should remain at this old version or if there are any serious issues with 1.2.13 on Debian? Should I be able to do an apt-get from unstable and get 1.2.13 and

how come only 1 out of 3 versions of wine actually gets built for etch? i mean i understand that the packages get built by different people so theyre not updated synchronously but ubuntu, suse, mandriva etc are all up to date at 0.9.60, whereas the latest etch package ist version 0.9.58, TWO versions behind !!! no fair! i mean cmon! debian is just as mainstream as the rest of em, so give us a

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 They aren't thoroughly tested, but I've been running on them for a little while and they seem stable. This is based on the latest RC from backports.org and is built for sarge. deb http://debian.delink.net/ sarge-delink main Enjoy, - -- http://www.delink.net/ Ok, so he's got a cellphone in one hand and latte in the other, I know what

Hi, I have been testing XenServer 4.1 and I have migrated to Xen 3.2.1 due to the lack of PCI passthrough in Citrix XenServer. I''ve spent 6 hours this evening installing backports packages and/or compiling the source in a fresh Debian Etch install. But still my DomU is crashing. I suspect I have too many versions floating around now so I will try again from scratch. What is the simplest

Hi, I'm new to the list. So, excuse me if I'm making a FAQ :-) What's the status of Xen in Debian? I know that there are Xen 3 packages available for sid, but what about sarge/etch? Are there packages also, even if only for Xen 2? I'd like to use it in a semi-production machine (which means that it's doing some work, even if it's not overly important) with sarge, and

Hi, I just did a clean install of Ruby 1.8.5 Rubygems 0.9.0 and the Mongrel and Mongrel_Cluster gems. I used only the Debian Etch package manager, nothing compiled myself. Now, on a testapp when I do a script/server, I get the: ** Ruby version is not up-to-date; loading cgi_multipart_eof_fix warning. But it''s not serving my app. Ruby is immediately on 100% CPU load (and 0.7%

I have recently upgraded to Ubuntu Gutsy and, for the first time, am using a 64-bit installation. After failing miserably to install R from source, not a problem for me in the past with a 32-bit install, I went the route of using the Debian Etch build. This went smoothly, but I am unable to update my numerous R and BioConductor packages, getting non-zero exit status errors on each package. Is

>/ these are the packages installed:/ > >/ ii linux-image-2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 2.6.18.dfsg.1-18etch1 / >/ Linux 2.6.18 image on AMD64/ >/ ii linux-modules-2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 2.6.18.dfsg.1-18etch1 / >/ Linux 2.6.18 modules on AMD64/ >/ ii xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64 3.2.0-2 / >/ The Xen Hypervisor on

Yesterday evening, I became unable to access http://wine.budgetdedicated.com/ . This has firstly become inaccessible to me for the purpose of finding out from the Web pages, whether version 0.9.59 has been adapted as binaries for Debian yet, which I personally need as a user of Kanotix, because the whole index can't be called up. But in addition right now, an 'apt-get update' fails

Replying here as well, since this is a frequent question. I uploaded the updated samba packages to the official debian archives in parallel with updating my repository - exactly the same source packages as are used to build samba for my repository. 4.18 should already be available on sid/unstable, I think. In trixie/testing it will migrate within 5 days if nothing other breaks. Updated bookworm

I was wondering if there would be any benefit to the general community if I made available a debian and ubuntu repository of up to date puppet packages. I have the infrastructure in place anyway for my work (pbuilder + falcon), and can quite easily run up a vhost on a VM somewhere. Debian Etch (4.0) for example has puppet 0.20.1, and will never get a newer version. Ubuntu Feisty has a newer

I am running R 2.7.1 on an eeepc with the standard Xandros Linux. I install/upgrade R binaries using synaptic from the http://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/debian/etch-cran/ repository. R 2.7.2 does not appear to be available from this repository. Will it be available soon or is there another repository I should be using? Tom -- View this message in context:

Dear users, I have uploaded the new 3.0.25a packages compiled for sarge. At the same time I have removed older 2.2.x and 3.0.x packages for Woody. Support for back porting packages to Woody was already discontinued, but older packages were still provided. As these packages were not updated after the recent security issues, I decided to remove them to avoid pushing people to use outdated and

On 26.10.2024 16:37, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: > Hi Michael, > > thanks for your effort from me, too... Thank you for the support as well, it makes me feel excellent :) > By the way, have you planned to get the Bookworm backports up to 4.21.x? Yes, it is waiting for current 4.21.1+dfsg-2 to migrate to testing (with the fixes mentioned in this thread), and I'll push it to

Hi! I've uploaded samba packages for debian & ubuntu in my repository, to include the fix for recent login/trust issue with 07/2023 windows updates. 4.16 packages will also be available later today (build is in progress now). http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba/ JFYI. Thanks, /mjt

Hi Michael, thanks for your effort from me, too... By the way, have you planned to get the Bookworm backports up to 4.21.x? Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Elias Pereira via samba schrieb am 26.10.2024 um 13:30: > Thanks for your work, Michael!!! > > On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 8:04?AM Michael Tokarev via samba < > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi!

Hello: I am tried to install the RODBC package in debian etch. At the end of the installation it appears errors: ********************************************** * Installing *source* package 'RODBC' ... checking for gcc... gcc -std=gnu99 checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no

Dear sig-R-Debian I'd like to second Christophe Bonenfan's plea for an up-to-date Ubuntu 64 (and maybe an up-to-date Debian 64) repository(ies). There seems to be no "easy" way, at least for Debian 64, to stay up-to-date on a 64 bits Debian-derived system, "easy" meaning being able to keep a consistent system up-to-date with no local package creation and no