similar to: mongrel limiting amount of connections ?

Hi List, I have a table that contains several fields that must be initialized when first created, but may not be altered afterwards (when updating the other fields) because they can be changed by external processes. I noticed that the ActiveRecord update commands (even update_attribute) only seem to work by loading the complete record, changing fields that need to be changed and doing a full

But is that not adviced in the manual[1]? I am also in the process of setting up dovecot behind a haproxy. Still testing with this. I was wondering why one would choose haproxy and not eg dovecot proxy (with director) [1] https://wiki2.dovecot.org/HAProxy -----Original Message----- From: Zelic Bojan [mailto:bojan.zelic at kudelskisecurity.com] Sent: woensdag 26 augustus 2020 23:39 To:

?I managed to figure this out. Just wanted to follow up if anyone in the future encounters the same issue. I am using HAProxy along with dovecot replication. When an email comes in... it is round robin'd to each of the 2 dovecot/postfix servers. I have postfix running on each server and it uses the local dovecot LMTP service for storing the mails. We sometimes get surges of emails(hundreds

further investigation leads me to think this is true. i can make my app sleep for 60 seconds and i don''t get it marked as down or show missed health checks in haproxy. the one caveat is that if i delete the check.txt from my public directory then i get missing file check.txt in my rails production logs (whereas i don''t see anything in the production logs if check.txt is present).

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1736 Bug ID: 1736 Summary: nftables - dynamic update for verdict map from the packet path Product: nftables Version: 1.0.x Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft

Hello All, I have a linux box running with three NIC''s, I have used brctl tool to configure this box as a bridge, i have given it ONE logical ipaddres, Every thing is working fine, but now i am required to configure the same bridge as a LOAD BALANCER.... On some googling i found the following link http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html This HOWTO requires me to have one

Hello Zed ! I''ve experimented a simple but limited performance tweak in the mongrel rails loader. With the following apache 2.2 mod proxy loadbalancer setup : # Redirect all non-static requests to cluster RewriteCond %{DOCUMENT_ROOT}/%{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteRule ^/(.*)$ balancer://mongrel_cluster%{REQUEST_URI} [P,QSA,L] We can assume that mongrel is called only when the

Hi all, I've 4 servers with dovecot and ldap authentication behind a loadbalancer (Alteon). To connect to dovecot, client need to use a vip of the loadbalancer. To connect to the ldap server, dovecot need to use the loadbalancer cause there are several ldap server. The loadbalancer close a connection without activity during 30mn Dovecot lauch several authentication process who have

Hello, Assuming we have two (low traffic) servers (on different data centers) replicated using dsync, what is the best way to automatically direct users to the main server when it is up and to the redundant one when the main server is down? Using DNS? I've seen that DNS-based failover has generally issues (for example:

Dear list, I have setup a master-master replication setup. My primairy MX's send email over on a DNS loadbalanced way, so DNS is doing some kind of round-robin way of sending mail to both master servers. I found out, that on one of the two machines, the email synchronisation is heavily delayed. Lets assume server A receives a mail from the MX; it synchronises almost instantly with the other

On 20/8/2015 11:09 ??, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > As soon as I manage to re-build Dovecot with the latest snapshot, I'll > test it! Hello, I've built dovecot with a today snapshot from hg (dovecot-2-2-9f815e781beb) and I am trying to enable haproxy. I configured as follows (lines added compared to initial config are marked with +): + haproxy_trusted_networks =

Hi Everyone, I wouldlike to set up a postfix-dovecot with HA using HAproxy but im facing issues. I've followed this documentation : http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HAProxy (pour dovecot) http://blog.haproxy.com/2012/06/30/efficient-smtp-relay-infrastructure-with-postfix-and-load-balancers/ (pour postfix) Package's version : dovecot : 2:2.2.19 (>= 2.2.19 pour proxy protocol)

Hi everybody, we're currently in the process of drafting our new mailserver-setup. Instead of a single-server-setup we'd like to have two equal servers behind a loadbalancer like LVS and shared mailhomes on NFS. We'd like to use dovecot for POP/IMAP, dovecot-deliver as LDA. - It's probably the best idea to direct SMTP and POP/IMAP always to the same server behind the

Hi all, I'm load balancing 4 mysql databases using HAProxy. The setup seems to be working pretty well. Except I keep seeing these messages turning up in syslog: Mar 12 22:11:31 db1 kernel: [6058125.959624] type=1400 audit(1457820691.824:3029129): avc: denied { name_connect } for pid=801 comm="haproxy" dest=7778 scontext=system_u:system_r:haproxy_t:s0

for more information : https://www.mankier.com/8/haproxy_selinux On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 2:05 AM, Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org> wrote: > Am 12.03.2016 um 23:18 schrieb Tim Dunphy: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm load balancing 4 mysql databases using HAProxy. The setup seems to be >> working pretty well. Except I keep seeing these messages turning up in

When is 2.3 scheduled to be released? Kevin > On Oct 26, 2017, at 7:57 AM, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > Hi! > > There is support for haproxy SSL TLVs in 2.3. See > > https://github.com/dovecot/core/compare/f43567aa%5E...b6fbc235.patch > > Aki > >> On October 26, 2017 at 12:25 PM Rok Poto?nik <r at rula.net> wrote: >>

Am 12.03.2016 um 23:18 schrieb Tim Dunphy: > Hi all, > > I'm load balancing 4 mysql databases using HAProxy. The setup seems to be > working pretty well. Except I keep seeing these messages turning up in > syslog: > > > Mar 12 22:11:31 db1 kernel: [6058125.959624] type=1400 > audit(1457820691.824:3029129): avc: denied { name_connect } for pid=801 >

guys, i am trying to install HAproxy infront of my webserver. usually my webserver listens on port 80 and since we have 5 ip address serving 5 different sites on the same physical server the webserver listens to all these ips and proxy the traffic to the relavent app servers. now the problem is if want to loadbalance i should install HAproxy on port 80 and there lies the problem.

Hi! There is support for haproxy SSL TLVs in 2.3. See https://github.com/dovecot/core/compare/f43567aa%5E...b6fbc235.patch Aki > On October 26, 2017 at 12:25 PM Rok Poto?nik <r at rula.net> wrote: > > > Even though it seems dovecot (using 2.2.33.1) supports haproxy's > send-proxy-v2, it seems to lack send-proxy-v2-ssl (which also sends > client's ssl state).

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14160 Bug ID: 14160 Summary: rsynd in daemon mode should support haproxy proxy protocol Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: