similar to: Excessive Swap with MSVC++ and Wine

Hi, Just tried to compile the latest opus code using Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 Express. It had a few errors preventing the solution from building, probably due to MSVC quirks. The attached patch allows it to compile on MSVC, but is untested with other compilers. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > I filed a bug yesterday ( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5046 ) > and Anton kindly explained that LLVM is doing the right thing as per the > ABI (the GCC ABI, I'll add). > >  1. Is there a LLVM way of dealing with this without using separate code >  for VC++ and GCC? I'm not sure what

Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> writes: > BTW, it's even worse, as aggregates passed by value are, well... passed > by value, contrary to the 386 unix ABI which uses pointers. I'm afraid > that this has no so easy solution as the sret issue. Is there any LLVM > target where aggregates are "really" passed by value? This is not entirely true. MSVC never uses

Hi, is there any news about this problem? How hart it will be to resolve this compatibility problem with Visual Studio functions ? This is really great problem for my project with should call may different function compiled by Visual Studio!!! Here is also problem that is looking similar. http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5046 -- View this message in context:

On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > * To understand why they chose to work on MS C++ ABI compatibility > instead of other most basic missing features that preclude using > Clang for serious C++ development. I'll be grateful if anyone > involved on the MS C++ ABI comments on this (it was already mentioned > that Wine is

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > prompts me to ask if it is right to submit to the mailing lists patches > implementing a feature that is known to be legally "controversial". > I have no idea what you are talking about, but if you have legal or other questions, or want to discuss 'legal controversies', this isn't the

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > prompts me to ask if it is right to submit to the mailing lists patches > implementing a feature that is known to be legally "controversial". > I have no idea what you are talking about, but if you have legal or other questions, or want to discuss 'legal controversies', this isn't the

Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > Is there not a later free (as in free beer) version? There are also 2008, 2010 and 2012 versions. VS2012 Express requires Win7 to run (though it can create programs compatible with WinXP). VS2010 Express works on WinXP. It is possible to compile x86-64 programs with it, but it requires Platform SDK (also free). VS2005 and 2008

Hello Eli. Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: >> I filed a bug yesterday ( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5046 ) >> and Anton kindly explained that LLVM is doing the right thing as per the >> ABI (the GCC ABI, I'll add). >> >>  1. Is there a LLVM way of

Recently I downloaded MSVC++2005 Express Edition and it turns out that it wasn't possible to compile all files without several changes: 1) FLAC.sln has one extra "EndProject" line --- a\FLAC.sln 2013-06-17 11:57:09.000000000 +0400 +++ b\FLAC.sln 2013-08-16 20:19:34.630486700 +0400 @@ -157,7 +157,6 @@ EndProject Project("{4cefbc7c-c215-11db-8314-0800200c9a66}") =

Hi, This page http://clang.llvm.org/docs/MSVCCompatibility.html says clang-cl supports C ++ exceptions, but I cannot compile code with simple try{}catch{} error : cannot compile this throw expression yet What am i doing wrong? -- WBR, Arkady Shapkin aka Dragon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Jul 31, 2013, at 3:13 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > Full disclosure: I'm the guy who filled the PR requesting the feature > the OP's is working on and, when someone tried to close it as WONTFIX, I > strongly opposed. Furthermore, MSVC++ is my Windows compiler and my > projects suffer from unwelcome complexity for working around the lack of > this

Let's go directly to the example struct S { double dummy1; double dummy2; }; S bar(); S foo() { return bar(); } This is the result of g++ -c -S -O2 (focus on the final `ret'): __Z3foov: LFB0: pushl %ebp LCFI0: movl %esp, %ebp LCFI1: pushl %ebx LCFI2: subl $20, %esp LCFI3: movl 8(%ebp), %ebx movl %ebx, (%esp) call __Z3barv pushl %eax movl %ebx, %eax movl -4(%ebp), %ebx

Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: > This thread is odd to me. It seems that the gist of your guys' > argument is that you don't know if we will ever get full support, > therefore we don't welcome progress towards that (very useful) > goal/feature. > > If the specific proposal doesn't make make sense from a design > standpoint, that's one

I can't get anything to run using wine on my new laptop. I have slackware 9.1, kernel 2.6.0, and XFree86 4.4 RC2. I am running 2 programs on my desk top machine that won't run on the laptop. THe desktop has slackware 9.0, kernel 2.4.22 and XFree86 4.3.0. Can anybody help? Also the laptop has an installation of windows xp which is not found by the wineinstall script. Thanks, Tom

Hi, I can't install a program and I think that the problem is the keyboard. The log file is above. Could anyoune help me? Thanks, Savio Ramos fixme:keyboard:X11DRV_KEYBOARD_DetectLayout Your keyboard layout was not found! Using closest match instead (Brazilian ABNT-2 keyboard layout) for scancode mapping. Please define your layout in windows/x11drv/keyboard.c and submit them to us for

I think I know the answer to this question based on all of the research I've done, but figured I'd ask anyway. I needed a couple of servers for an HA cluster, and our "order" guy here ordered me a couple of Dell PowerEdge T110 II. I'd planned on using IPMI to fence these things with, but later found out that this model is only one of two PE servers Dell sells that has a

Hi All I had to assure the randomness of backgammon game's two dices. I took 8,000,000 observations and found that one of the dices is not uniform distributed. I took 80,000,000 observations and found that the dice is uniform distributed. In both tests I used Pearson Chi Square test. My questions: 1. How many observations should I take? 2. How much the 80,000,000

Dear R-folks: I have a group of data ('x' and 'y' axis), but I'd like to know how to draw a graph which would fits my data in a better way, I also need its equation. Could you give me any R-rutine ideas?. I thank you in advance for your kind support. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

More specifically, the hashing functions in most operating systems will be provided by OpenSSL, rather than libc. OpenSSL does not have SHA1_End but since it is used only for generating fake challenges, the impact of changing it to SHA1_Final should be small. A more general solution would be to have configure.in test for sha1.h, openssl/sha.h, and SHA1_End. configure.in should also add