similar to: files ?!

Hi! I'm having some problems installing a 2CD application under wine. I run the setup.exe from the 1st cd (so I have to mount it anyway) and when the setup asks for cd2 I get stuck, because I can not remove cd1 from the drive, because it is mounted and because there's an application using it (setup.exe). Is there any way to change cds? MBJr.

Hi, I'm having a problem with applications with InstallShield based setup environments. There's a window coming up saying that "Setup is preparing the InstallShield Wizard, which will guide you through the rest of the setup process. Please Wait." and this is absolutely OK, but there's an other message which says "Error installing iKernel.exe: (0x800)".

Hi, This is some short of technical question or might be my stupidity, please tell me so ;o) Ok, let's say I have an application which I would like to run in 640x480x32/fullscreen. I have my basic X desktop settings at 1024x768 and I would no like to change the resolution. Is there any way to let wine start an X server on another shell with a different resolution, automatically switch

Hello, Still I'm suckin a lot with installshield applications. Is there any way to install "Microsoft Windows Installer" properly under wine? Regards, MBJr.

Hi, I have an idea and I dont know if its bad or not, so please tell me ;o) There're some windows based applications I need to run but they do need some registry entries. If I choose to export my whole windows registry and import it to wine's registry, should it make wine crash/die/unworkable? MBJr.

Hi Folks I'm trying to run my homebanking-software under wine. How can I get networkaccess with wine ? I have already copied the winsock32.dll, but I think there has to be bone more but that ! Exists a FAQ for that problem ? -- Gru? Frank

Hi Manuel, On Nov 28, 2011, at 2:49 AM, Manuel Klimek wrote: > Hi, > > while working on tooling on top of clang/llvm we found the file system > abstractions in clang/llvm to be one of the points that could be nicer > to integrate with. I’m writing this mail to propose a strawman and get > some feedback on what you guys think the right way forward is (or > whether we should

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> wrote: > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Dec 5, 2011, at 9:04 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > >> Hi Manuel, >> >> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: >>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Douglas Gregor

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >> Hi Manual, >> >> I'm +2 on the general idea. >> >> I have had various thoughts in this direction as well (although no >> implementation). See: >>

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > Hi Manual, > > I'm +2 on the general idea. > > I have had various thoughts in this direction as well (although no > implementation). See: >  http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2010-July/009903.html > for my RFC from last year (focused at bug reporting, but involved > defining

On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> wrote: >> Hi Manuel, >> >> On Nov 28, 2011, at 2:49 AM, Manuel Klimek wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> while working on tooling on top of clang/llvm we found the file system >>>

Hi Manuel, On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> wrote: >> Hi Manuel, >> >> On Nov 28, 2011, at 2:49 AM, Manuel Klimek wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> while working on tooling on top of clang/llvm we found the file system

Sent from my iPhone On Dec 5, 2011, at 9:04 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > Hi Manuel, > > On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> wrote: >>> Hi Manuel, >>> >>> On Nov 28, 2011, at 2:49 AM, Manuel Klimek

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: >>>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at

2011/12/6 Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> > wrote: > >>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:33 PM,

Hi Manual, I'm +2 on the general idea. I have had various thoughts in this direction as well (although no implementation). See: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2010-July/009903.html for my RFC from last year (focused at bug reporting, but involved defining a VFS layer). My one main implementation level comment is I don't think FileManager is the right API layer to abstract

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: >>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> wrote: >>>> Hi Manuel,

Hi, while working on tooling on top of clang/llvm we found the file system abstractions in clang/llvm to be one of the points that could be nicer to integrate with. I’m writing this mail to propose a strawman and get some feedback on what you guys think the right way forward is (or whether we should just leave things as they are). First, the FileManager we have in clang has helped us a lot for

On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Manuel, > > On Nov 28, 2011, at 2:49 AM, Manuel Klimek wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> while working on tooling on top of clang/llvm we found the file system >> abstractions in clang/llvm to be one of the points that could be nicer >> to integrate with. I’m writing this mail to

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> wrote: >>> Hi Manuel, >>> >>> On Nov 28, 2011, at 2:49 AM, Manuel Klimek wrote: >>> >>>>