similar to: Microsoft Antitrust Remedy proposal, take 3

The proposed settlement in the Microsoft antitrust trial will probably be accepted by the judge unless a lot of people complain soon, even though it lacks any useful enforcement provisions and fails to prohibit many of Microsoft's anticompetitive practices. I've drafted an open letter to the Department of Justice to explain why the proposed settlement should not be accepted; it's at

Jeremy: Just wanted to pass this snippet I saw from slashdot http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/11/07/053230 which says: Public Comment Period In MS/DOJ Battle Posted by timothy on Wednesday November 07, @07:03AM from the tap-your-mind dept. PacketMaster writes: "Somthing that I didn't know, and perhaps many others didn't

The Samba Team would welcome Microsoft documenting its proprietary server protocols. Unfortunately this isn't what the settlement stipulates. The settlement states : "E. Starting nine months after the submission of this proposed Final Judgment to the Court, Microsoft shall make available for use by third parties, for the sole purpose of interoperating with a Windows Operating System

Hi all, I wanted to give an update on this as I know this MS Hotfix is critical and must be applied to protect against the (latest) Microsoft worm. I think I've found the problem in the code, and am currently testing a fix for this (not in the release to others to test stage yet). As soon as I'm reasonably confident I'll put a patch out there for others to test, and we'll

hello, i try to add a speex compression on the TDM Talkthrough on the BF-533 EZ-KIT LITE but when i compile i obtain the following errors: [Error li1021] The following symbols referenced in processor 'p0' could not be resolved: 'speex_bits_destroy [_speex_bits_destroy]' referenced from 'Debug\Process_data.doj' 'speex_bits_init [_speex_bits_init]' referenced from

I'm having troubles with a DOS program running from a samba 3 share. When I close the program it tells: General failure reading drive F Abort, Retry, Fail? (F is a network drive mapped on the samba share) I have increased smbd debug level and after retrying I have this in the log: [2003/09/28 11:19:56, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(580) unix_clean_name [/TTN02/RESHET1/DOJ] [2003/09/28

I've been wanting to try out Squat for full-text indexing for a while now, so I finally gave it a whirl. I did a fresh pull from hg. I have it enabled, but it's taking *forever* to do a query. (Using alpine, I issued a Select command for all messages with some word anywhere, which presumably caused the Squat indexer to run.) I think Dovecot is infinite looping. I thought something

Dear group, Here is my data frame: futures <- structure(list(DESCRIPTION = c("CORN Jul/10", "CORN Jul/10", "CORN Jul/10", "CORN Jul/10", "CORN Jul/10", "LIVE CATTLE Aug/10", "LIVE CATTLE Aug/10", "SUGAR NO.11 Jul/10", "SUGAR NO.11 Jul/10", "SUGAR NO.11 Jul/10", "SUGAR NO.11

Dear group, Here is the kind of data.frame I obtain every day with my function : futures <- structure(list(DESCRIPTION = c("CORN Jul/10", "CORN Jul/10", "CORN Jul/10", "CORN Jul/10", "CORN Jul/10", "LIVE CATTLE Aug/10", "LIVE CATTLE Aug/10", "SUGAR NO.11 Jul/10", "SUGAR NO.11 Jul/10", "SUGAR

I have an object, which I pull in from a csv file here http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n4638691/jan_2011.csv jan_2011.csv mydata <- read.csv("jan_2011.csv", header=TRUE, sep=",") > head(mydata) Delivery.Date Hour.Ending Repeated.Hour.Flag Settlement.Point Settlement.Point.Price 1 01/01/2011 01:00 N HB_BUSAVG

Dear group, Here is my function : position<-function(x) { pose<-read.csv2((paste(c("LSCPos",x,".csv"),collapse="")),dec=".",sep=",",as .is=T,h=T,skip=1)[,c(4,8,14,15)] pose$CREATED.DATE<-as.Date(pose$CREATED.DATE,"%d/%m/%y") futures<-pose[-grep("USD",pose[,1]),]

Dear group, Here is my function: #return the daily PL for day y PLDaily<-function(x,y) { #find elements in my directory with "LSCPos" in the name, keep the numeric part in the name and #create a list l<-gsub("\\D","",dir()[grep("LSCPos",dir())]) #select in the list the desired elements

Greetings -- Many of you have downloaded and tried out Astmanproxy, a multi-threaded C-based proxy for Asterisk's Manager Interface. It has been under development since April 2005 and was presented at the Madrid Astricon in June, and will also be presented at Astricon in Anaheim in October. There has been interest in setting up an Astmanproxy mailing list specifically devoted to

Dear group, I know this issue has been already covered, and before you reply I must say I have read the R-FAQ and search the mailing list archive. I still can't manage to change my factor to numeric as I couldn't find any clear answer. Here is my df : Pose1 <- structure(list(DESCRIPTION = structure(c(1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 8L), .Label = c(" SUGAR NO.11 May/10 ", "COTTON

Dear group, Here is my df : pose16 <- structure(list(DESCRIPTION = structure(c(1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 6L, 7L, 8L, 9L, 12L), .Label = c("COPPER May/10", "COTTON NO.2 Jul/10", "CRUDE OIL miNY May/10", "GOLD Jun/10", "ROBUSTA COFFEE (10) Jul/10", "SOYBEANS Jul/10", "SUGAR NO.11 Jul/10", "SUGAR NO.11 May/10",

(Cross posted to speex-dev from iglance) Enzo -- I haven't tried the fixed point engine, though I've considered it for the WinCE port. For the desktop/laptop edition I'm assuming the slight short->float conversion cost will be made up by the improved performance of the floating point implementation. But I could be wrong: 1) Can anyone recommend whether Speex performs better

Here you go, Ian...... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: G3RIR <g3rir@yahoo.com> Date: 05-Apr-2006 20:54 Subject: [dmuars] Eh up - March 144 results altered To: dmuars@yahoogroups.com What's going on here. The results of the MArch 144 UKAC have been re-published and we have lost out considerably. Either I don't understand the rules or we have been robbed We scored

FYI.. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 15:41:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Pattara Kiatisevi <ott@linux.thai.net> Reply-To: oggonachip@yahoogroups.com To: oggonachip@yahoogroups.com Subject: [oggonachip] Ogg-on-a-Chip project first phase finished Hi all, Finally our master thesis is finished! Ogg Vorbis player ran with RTEMS operating system on LEON on the FPGA

There are some CSV file from the link below. I'm having trouble installing the package. Is this the package I have to use or is there another one I need to use? If so how do I get this one loaded. https://www.enmax.com/Power/Energy+Retailers/Settlement+Reports/Profile+settlement+report.htm install.packages("RCurl", repos =

Paul, I also think that bridge may not be the right place for VEPA, but rather a simpler sw/hw mux Although the VEPA support may reside in multiple places (I.e. also in the bridge) As Arnd pointed out Or already added an extension to qemu that allow direct guest virtual NIC mapping to an interface device (vs using tap), this was done specifically to address VEPA, and result in much faster