similar to: need newer binutils?

Dear guys , my box spec : [root@localhost asterisk]# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 8 model name : Pentium III (Coppermine) stepping : 10 cpu MHz : 1002.289 cache size : 256 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception

This patch (apologies for the size) updates zlib/* to the files that ship with zlib 1.1.3. Index: zlib/ChangeLog =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/rsync/zlib/ChangeLog,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -r1.1 ChangeLog --- zlib/ChangeLog 7 May 1998 06:19:41 -0000 1.1 +++ zlib/ChangeLog 30 Jan 2002 01:12:41 -0000 @@ -1,6 +1,54 @@ ChangeLog

Hi Rich, I ran these commands as non-root: ./autogen.sh && make && make distcheck It got most of the way through, but failed in the VPATH part while rebuilding from a ./_build subdir, like this: make[4]: Entering directory `/h/j/w/co/hivex/hivex-1.3.6/_build/ocaml' mkdir -p /usr/lib64/ocaml mkdir -p /usr/lib64/ocaml/stublibs ocamlfind install \

Still don't recommend you use 'make install', but here we go. Rich.

<https://github.com/Chocrates> Apologies if this is the wrong list, I initially opened a github ticket before reading that github isn't the right spot. Trying to compile libguestfs and in the process need to get hivex compiled and installed. Hivex compiles and installs fine (I think), but ocamlfind doesn't seem to pick up hivex after the install causing the autogen.sh script in

Hi, I am wondering if someone knows about a VHDL simulator (maybe still in early developpement) that use LLVM in its compilation process. To summarize, VHDL is a hardware description language, which means that VHDL is like any other programming language except that the output of its synthesis is not a list of assembly instructions but a description of a circuit with logical gates. This

Today I did it, for the very first time: Did not build a package. Just ran "make install". Twice! ... ocamlfind install \ -ldconf ignore -destdir /usr/lib64/ocaml \ guestfs \ META *.so *.a *.cma *.cmi ./*.mli *.cmx *.cmxa ocamlfind: Package guestfs is already installed - (file /usr/lib64/ocaml/guestfs/META already exists) Makefile:2053: recipe for target

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 What is the expected footprint of a tool using the LLVM JIT? I have created a simple project that uses the LLVM C++ API to JIT calls to XPCOM method signature... it works well, but the component DLL is very large (Linux x86-74, 5.8MB optimized and stripped). Is this normal? Am I linking to "too much" or not using the correct link flags?

Commit-ID: 95a3123c94abc28c65f33c9589693dde9f140fe1 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=95a3123c94abc28c65f33c9589693dde9f140fe1 Author: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> AuthorDate: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 22:29:52 +0100 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 22:53:10 +0100 [klibc] Kbuild, klcc: Support

I've been using libguestfs-1.18.9 but decided to "upgrade" to 1.19.60. Using Ubuntu 12.04 with the older version installed via source. So I went through the same process with the new version of guestfs sources and got the following errors on 'make install': make[2]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'. make install-data-hook make[3]: Entering directory

objcopy needs "output-target" and "binary-architecture" parameters which makes it necessary to keep a list of known architectures. The bin2s.pl script generates input for the GNU assembler which should produce an object file that is equivalent to that produced by objcopy. I have successfully tested the change on an amd64 Debian/unstable system. --- helper/Makefile.am |

Commit-ID: 7752eb456addbd1973e9c6b609294ccef89a65a2 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=7752eb456addbd1973e9c6b609294ccef89a65a2 Author: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> AuthorDate: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 21:48:07 +0100 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 21:50:09 +0100 [klibc] klcc: Treat CC, LD, STRIP

On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: > What is the expected footprint of a tool using the LLVM JIT? Right now it's ~1.5 to 2M for one platform, at least on darwin. > I have created a simple project that uses the LLVM C++ API to JIT calls > to XPCOM method signature... it works well, but the component DLL is > very large (Linux x86-74, 5.8MB optimized and stripped). Is

Sorry to bug everyone. I can't find the messages about this one any more. I have had wine running in the past but currently it gives me the error about being unable to find libntdll.so (wine: error in loading shared libraries: libntdll.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory). I had codeweavers 20010305 installed and our application sort of running under it. I wanted

--- builder/Makefile.am | 18 +++++++++++++- configure.ac | 2 ++ mllib/Makefile.am | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- ocaml/Makefile.am | 28 +++++++++++++++------- ocaml/examples/Makefile.am | 13 ++++++++++ resize/Makefile.am | 18 +++++++++++++- sparsify/Makefile.am | 18 +++++++++++++- sysprep/Makefile.am | 18

This is a first attempt to build libguestfs with just a ocaml bytecode compiler. The three tools written in ocaml will be build only when an ocamlopt compiler is available. Olaf --- Makefile.am | 5 ++++- configure.ac | 2 ++ ocaml/Makefile.am | 20 +++++++++++++++++--- resize/Makefile.am | 2 +- sparsify/Makefile.am | 2 +- sysprep/Makefile.am | 2 +- 6

Hi [1.] One line summary of the problem: rsync segfaulting and the kernel oops'ing while synchronizing two smbfs's [2.] Full description of the problem/report: I am implementing file synchronization between two Windows NT 4 machines through two smbfs mounts. Rsync runs for about half an hour; then the kernel gives an oops and rsync segfaults. Hereafter the smbfs file system is

Full_Name: Sean Pieper Version: 2.3.1 OS: Windows Submission from: (NULL) (67.188.92.37) Hi, I am trying to create a qualitative figure for which I don't want tick marks or numbers, but having some axes would be nice. If I do: plot.new() axis(2,labels=FALSE,tick=FALSE,lty="solid",lwd=1) I expect this should give me a vertical line on the left edge of the plot, but nothing

Greetings, beginning with wine 1.9.11 I have a new bar below the game window which effectively steals part of the usable area. Here is a screenshot of Gothic I. http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/wine-1.9.11.png (931 KB) No desktop environment here, only IceWM. My games are started with shell scripts which cd to the directory of the game and then run 'wine program'. In the case of

I believe this patch has now been superseded by Hilko's commit here: https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/commit/f75142c577255b30f2a8e1d27baa5fd185594197 Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#)