similar to: OpenGL

On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Tobias Klausmann <tobias.johannes.klausmann at mni.thm.de> wrote: > > > On 24.05.2015 16:15, Pierre Moreau wrote: >>> >>> On 24 May 2015, at 16:03, Tobias Klausmann >>> <tobias.johannes.klausmann at mni.thm.de> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 24.05.2015 10:38, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:

> On 24 May 2015, at 16:03, Tobias Klausmann <tobias.johannes.klausmann at mni.thm.de> wrote: > > > > On 24.05.2015 10:38, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: >> >> >> On 05/24/2015 06:58 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>> nv30_validate_clip depends on the rasterizer state. Also we should >>> upload all the new clip planes on change since next time the

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99033 Bug ID: 99033 Summary: [NV67] Incomplete implementation of OpenGL 2.1 Product: Mesa Version: 13.0 Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau Assignee:

Hello R-helpers, What I have: I am working with vectors not matrice: #Basic equations A <-c(-20,-9,-2) x <-c(0.17,0.22,0.61) B <- crossprod(A,x) # R matrix multiplication works with vectors A%*%x==B # Is true... Question: If x is unknown and A and B are known, how do I solve for x in R? solve(A,B) won't work because A is not a square matrix solve(A,B) Error in solve.default(A,

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 07:12:21PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Fri, 11 May 2018 19:54:02 +0300 > Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 05:52:56PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > On Fri, 11 May 2018 18:34:50 +0300 > > > Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote: > > >

The dependency checking currently provided is clearly not good enough. There's currently two issues with the plugins that exist in the compiz repository. plane plugin conflicts with cube and rotate plugin, zoom plugin should probably work with either cube or plane but currently only loads when cube plugin is used. Adding a { CompPluginRuleBefore, "cube" } to the plane plugin and a

Dear All, I have made a scatter plot and placed a plane within it using scatterplot3d. However, I have been asked for the data points to be a surface plot or have the plane more closely resemble the data rather than show trends. I have since tried to use the rgl package. Why doesn't this package use the window which already contains graphics? I have one axis with decreasing values and two

Pick up the correct source rectangle from framebuffer. Without this multihead setups are not working correctly. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_plane.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_plane.c

Pick up the correct source rectangle from framebuffer. Without this multihead setups are not working correctly. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_plane.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_plane.c

Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_plane.c | 31 ++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_plane.c index bc4bc4475a8c..a0f91658c2bc 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_plane.c +++

Hi fellas, I was searching for informations about Wine and OpenGL 3.2. I didn't find anything. What do you guys think about that. That will affect wined3d ? I mean, some functions will be optimized because now OpenGL is comparing to Direct3D ? Thank you. Jayson Reis -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- This has received light testing on NV18 and NV34 cards, using the modetest tool. Userspace support to use this for xv is not yet ready. I decided against creating a new "pvideo" engine -- that just seems way too heavy-handed compared to the ~10 lines of code in disp/nv04.c to deal with the PVIDEO interrupts. Even though

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> Replace the ad-hoc iturbt_709 property with the new standard COLOR_ENCODING property. Compiles, but not tested. Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Cc: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at

Add DRM_MODE_ROTATE_ and DRM_MODE_REFLECT_ defines to the UAPI as a convenience. Ideally the DRM_ROTATE_ and DRM_REFLECT_ property ids are looked up through the atomic API, but realizing that userspace is likely to take shortcuts and assume that the enum values are what is sent over the wire. As a result these defines are provided purely as a convenience to userspace applications.

Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_plane.c | 41 +++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_plane.c index 2e0d14e005db..1a0fbbb91ec7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_plane.c +++

Add DRM_MODE_ROTATE_ and DRM_MODE_REFLECT_ defines to the UAPI as a convenience. Ideally the DRM_ROTATE_ and DRM_REFLECT_ property ids are looked up through the atomic API, but realizing that userspace is likely to take shortcuts and assume that the enum values are what is sent over the wire. As a result these defines are provided purely as a convenience to userspace applications.

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92961 Bug ID: 92961 Summary: Xorg freezes (only mouse and ssh are still working) Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: high Component: Driver/nouveau

When going through a disable/enable cycle without changing the framebuffer the optimization added by commit 3954ff10e06e ("drm/virtio: skip set_scanout if framebuffer didn't change") causes the screen stay blank. Add a bool to force an update to fix that. Cc: 1882851 at bugs.launchpad.net Fixes: 3954ff10e06e ("drm/virtio: skip set_scanout if framebuffer didn't

When going through a disable/enable cycle without changing the framebuffer the optimization added by commit 3954ff10e06e ("drm/virtio: skip set_scanout if framebuffer didn't change") causes the screen stay blank. Add a bool to force an update to fix that. Cc: 1882851 at bugs.launchpad.net Fixes: 3954ff10e06e ("drm/virtio: skip set_scanout if framebuffer didn't

From: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> I really just wanted to fix i915 to re-enable its planes afer load detection (a two line patch). This is what I actually ended up with after I ran into a framebuffer refcount leak with said two line patch. I've tested this on a few i915 boxes and so far it's looking good. Everything else is just compile tested. Entire series