similar to: Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

Hello all, I’m currently trying to figure out how to forward ports to guests that are on a NAT Network. I have followed the directions on https://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking under the “Forwarding Incoming Connections” Section and get connection refused when attempting to connect. System: Ubuntu Server 18.04.1 Virsh / LibVirtd Version: 4.0.0 Here’s the contents of /etc/libvirt/hooks/qemu  

Hi! I want to forward the port 3389 from the domU to the virtual server with ip address 192.168.122.77 with not success... I tried a lot of iptables rules with no luck so far. Is this possible? I take a look at other post and I don''t found an answer. By example: /sbin/iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i xenbr0 --dport 3389 -j DNAT --to 192.168.122.77:3389 the virtual nic for the

At work I have a script that provisions a vm for use by employees. One step in this process is to fetch hadoop, which we happen to get from cloudera. I noticed the script always failed when I used libvirt's default networking (nat) but worked fine when I used user mode networking. My instinct is that this is related to (potentially uncommon) network traffic from the server in question, and

Hello, I came across an interesting problem in my home lab a few weeks ago as I'm prepping for my RHCE exam using Michael Jang study guide. I've been at this for days now, and I still can't wrap my head around how two or more virtual networks in default NAT configuration are even allowed to communicate with each other despite what the libvirt documentation said. Here's the

Dear libvirt users, I am encountering problems with network connections from VMs while running net-update on the host. I would be very grateful for suggestions of fixes or workarounds. I am using libvirt in the context of an automated test system which creates and destroys VMs fairly rapidly, hence network updates occur often. ## Reproducer The issue can be reproduced as follows. Run in a VM:

Hello, I'm a little confused on which networking option I need to choose when setting up a VM. I set up two VMs this past weekend both with NAT. Both able to were access the internet. The first one, I created in my / file system but didn't really have the space so I deleted it. The second one, I created in /home/kvm, but deleted it as well when I couldn't access it FROM the

Hello, On CentOS 6.5 x86_64 I have (/etc/sysconfig/iptables): *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0] -A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A FORWARD -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p icmp --icmp-type any -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT -A

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:05:19AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: >On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:26:59AM -0400, Travis S. Johnson wrote: >>Hello, >> >>I came across an interesting problem in my home lab a few weeks ago as I'm >>prepping for my RHCE exam using Michael Jang study guide. I've been at this >>for days now, and I still can't wrap my head around

(If this is a double post, I apologize, my email client crashed when I first sent it) I need some help to configure a secure network on my Xen server. I have been looking online and it seems a I need a routed network. But I am having a terrible time implementing it. My setup: Xen 3.4.2 CentOS 5.5 Dom0 1 NIC (eth0) All guests will be HVM What I want to do is something similar to a firewall

Hello, With all the talk about Firefly, I decided to check it out, it seems to work under wine (IAX only for some reason) so I'm thinking about using it on the road. Now, my Asterisk box is behind a firewall, so I have set the firewall to forward UDP port 4569 to my Asterisk box put I'm having problems with this. I followed the instructions on the Asterisk Firewall Rules page but it

Dear All, I have one centos box ( centos 4.0 ) which is connected to MSI wireless router....... And which is connected to my ISP MODEM. I incorporated wireless router so that I can use my laptop from any of my rooms. Now this Centos 4.0 box is my home server machine. The MSI Wireless Router has DHCP server enabled. Wireless router has provided each address to my machines basically internal IP

On Friday 22 November 2013 01:24 PM, Gao feng wrote: > On 11/22/2013 03:47 PM, Sherin A wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am not able to see vrbr0 in my box. Can some one help me with this ? . I am trying KVM+libvirt and planing to use Routed mode. I hope this virbr0 must be up for using this . I can give an >> strace too. >> >> OS : Debian , kernel 3.12.0

Not normally a question for this group, but you guys are very bridge/router/firewall savvy, so I thought I''d toss it here. I have a bridge. On one side of the bridge is that fancy thing called the Internet. On the other side is my LAN. The bridge is the obvious demarcation line and a good place to put a firewall. Now, I have all my iptables stuff planned out, EXCEPT for nat. The

I have a server whit 2 interfaces of network, where eth0 is the interfaces connetc to internet and eth1 to the internal network. This server hace a Squid only, but i setting the iptables for protection to the server. Iptables run from script and in this script i setting the redirection for the other server in my internal network to port 80 and 443. I follow the diferent how to and many manual, but

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:31:41PM -0400, Rhys Ferris wrote: >Hello all, > >I’m currently trying to figure out how to forward ports to guests that are on a NAT Network. I have followed the directions on https://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking under the “Forwarding Incoming Connections” Section and get connection refused when attempting to connect. > >System: Ubuntu Server 18.04.1

Hi, I just migrated my office's server from Slackware64 14.1 to CentOS 7. So far everything's running fine, I just have a few minor details to work out. I removed the firewalld package and replaced it by a simple Iptables script: --8<---------------------------------------------------- #!/bin/sh # # firewall-lan.sh IPT=$(which iptables) MOD=$(which modprobe) SYS=$(which sysctl)

hi all i m connecting to my samba server from a windows xp client. whenever i started my firewall script the client used to take 4 minutes to connect to the samba server and i run IRIS (sniffer) on my windows xp box it captures a packet as shown below ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OPTIONS /

Thanks for the reply! output: net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1 What do you mean "The out:any and" Anywhere else I can look as to why the connection isn't going? Do I need some kind of listener at that port on the host? I'm not even seeing the packet count on the prerouting chain increase when the connection attempts are made. On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 8:58 AM Martin Kletzander

Ok, I have a challenge - get two services working over a single port. (!) Sometimes it's a web service, sometimes it's a VNC service. Here's what I had in mind: 1) Server is normally a webserver listening on port 80, and normally has the following rules active: # iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT # iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j MASQUERADE 2)

I have a dual homed server in an install for someone who is very cost sensitive. This server originally is being setup as an Asterisk server, but now the simplest thing for me to do is also set it up to provide internet access for the small shop as well. So it will have one external, WAN facing nic that needs all incoming ports except UDP 5060 and 10000 -> 60000 blocked for all but two ips.