similar to: yum repo problem?

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Ralph Giles wrote: > As such it's an incompatible change, for which you should also > zero the 'age' field. So 1.1.1-beta1 should have been 2:0:0, > not 2:0:1. [...] > Yes, I agree. The numbering is all about coexisting installs of the > various versions. Ok. I need to know what to do about this... is 1.1.2 with fixed sonames just around the

i'm trying to build ices0.4 and vorbis-tools 1.0.1 with flac 1.1.1. Neither seems happy, hence the crossposting (sorry). ICES0.4 --- ices refuses to see the libFLAC library, even if i specify --with-flac=/usr/local/lib (or even just --with-flac=/usr/local/, as the configure script seems to look in the lib and include subdirectories of the specified path?). i get a configure error:

i'm trying to build ices0.4 and vorbis-tools 1.0.1 with flac 1.1.1. Neither seems happy, hence the crossposting (sorry). ICES0.4 --- ices refuses to see the libFLAC library, even if i specify --with-flac=/usr/local/lib (or even just --with-flac=/usr/local/, as the configure script seems to look in the lib and include subdirectories of the specified path?). i get a configure error:

/usr/bin/ld: bad -rpath option collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[4]: *** [libFLAC.la] Error 1 --- flac-1.1.2/src/libFLAC/Makefile.in.orig 2005-02-04 21:23:37.000000000 -0500 +++ flac-1.1.2/src/libFLAC/Makefile.in 2006-04-30 20:30:00.000000000 -0400 @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ rm -f "$${dir}/so_locations"; \ done libFLAC.la: $(libFLAC_la_OBJECTS)

Note : I'm subscribed to the list. Please don't CC replies to me. Hi all, I am trying to compiler current CV head on a PowerPC G3 Debain system. Debian test has automake 1.9 which is a little more stringent about errors than 1.8. The following patch has the following fixes. 0) Remove AC_CANNONIAL_HOST because it has already been invoked earlier 1) Make sure

On Thursday 04 October 2007 04:27:47 you wrote: > Sir, you need to provide more information. What kind of errors? What > is not working? What exactly are you trying to do? What compiler are > you using? H IV0, we are using a lot of different cross-compiler (mainly based on GCC 3.4.x) When I tried to cross-compile FLAC for non-i386 platforms (such as ARM), I use use

Hi, And thanks for flac. There's a minor problem when compiling flac: libtool warns about mixing up shared and static libraries. Typical messages are: *** Warning: Linking the shared library libxmms-flac.la against the *** static library ../../src/plugin_common/libplugin_common.a is not portable! *** Warning: Linking the shared library libxmms-flac.la against the *** static library

On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 07:12:35PM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > Yeah, it's useful, so now there is a > FLAC__seekable_stream_decoder_get_decode_position() and > FLAC__file_decoder_get_decode_position(). I haven't documented > them yet but you can see an example in > src/metaflac/operations_shorthand_seektable.c where I use it > during seektable creation. Ok, here is

On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 09:37:18PM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > as far as I can piece together, the last releases went like: > > FLAC release libOggFLAC went to > ------------- ------------------------------------------ > 1.1.0 1:2:0 from 1:1:0 (code changes only I think) > 1.1.1-beta1 2:0:1 from 1:2:0 (some i'faces added, some changed) > 1.1.1

Not sure if this is the right place to post this... I have attached a patch for the build system which lets FLAC build on IRIX and Cygwin. -------------- next part -------------- ? Makefile ? aclocal.m4 ? autom4te.cache ? config.guess ? config.log ? config.status ? config.sub ? configure ? depcomp ? install-sh ? irix.patch ? libtool ? libtool-disable-static ? ltmain.sh ? missing ? mkinstalldirs ?

It's official: http://xiph.org/ogg/flac.html It's OK to keep submitting patches but I'm going to hold off on integrating anything until CVS is moved over. Note that codec code (libFLAC, libFLAC++, libOggFLAC, libOggFLAC++) will be covered under Xiph's BSD-like license from here on out. Josh __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus -

On Sun, 09 Jan 2005, Ralph Giles wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 12:22:18AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > liboggflac FROM THE 1.0.4 RELEASE has version-info 0:1:0 > liboggflac FROM THE 1.1.1 RELEASE has version-info 2:1:1 Well, the packages we are having trouble here are: flac 1.1.0 (let me check... libOggFLAC version-info 1:2:0) debian package: liboggflac1 (matches

OK, I'm coming to this a little late (been sick) but I'll try to answer all in one mail: On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 08:31:47PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > liboggflac1 did not change the soname (better check this, it > might require a > > soname change, check the seekable ogg-flac support stuff). > > CCing upstream on this. Josh, did 1.1.1 change interfaces in

Hello, I have a few packages where the latest updated version in 5.0 is greater than the current 5.1 version. Here is the list: package, installed version (from 5.0 updates), available (in 5.1) flac 1.1.2-28.el5_0.1 1.1.2-27 flac-devel 1.1.2-28.el5_0.1 1.1.2-27 hpijs 1.6.7-4.1.el5.3 1.6.7-4.1 libsane-hpaio 1.6.7-4.1.el5.3 1.6.7-4.1 thunderbird 1.5.0.12-5.el5.centos 1.5.0.12-3.el5.centos

On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 01:36:23AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Well, the packages we are having trouble here are: > flac 1.1.0 (let me check... libOggFLAC version-info 1:2:0) > debian package: liboggflac1 (matches libtool soname - ok) > > oggflac 1.1.0 not forward or backwards compatible with 1.0.4 -> ok. > oggflac 1.1.1 not forward or backwards

On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 12:22:18AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Well, if something built against 1.0.4 can (even in corner cases) > malfunction with 1.1.1, then yes, it must be 2:1:0. This holds true to > the soname of the C++ libs too if changes on the underlying C libraries are > somehow exported through the C++ ones. Ok. One more time. liboggflac FROM THE 1.0.4

On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 11:11:24PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > I have just finished uploading the source release for FLAC 1.0.4 beta > to Sourceforge; there are no binary releases. See the included > doc/html/news.html for the changes since 1.0.3; there are quite a few. > > http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/flac/flac-1.0.4_beta-src.tar.gz?download I just downloaded 1.0.4 beta,

I think the basic problem is that configure can't find any C++ compiler on your system, which is required to build some of the libraries. It's kind of hard to imagine that Mandrake would supply gcc but not g++; maybe something else is wrong. Anyway, if you absolutely do not want any of the C++ stuff, you can just remove the following directories from SUBDIRS in src/Makefile libFLAC++

Hi, A package verification on recently CentOS 5.1 reveals that some packages is outdated comparing with the 5.0. Here are some examples: 5.0 5.1 tzdata-2007h-1.el5 tzdata-2007d-1.el5 libpng-1.2.10-7.1.el5_0.1 libpng-1.2.10-7.0.2 perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 perl-5.8.8-10 The "updates" directory on CentOS 5.1 repository does

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When