similar to: BIND and a second server resolving itself

> On Mar 26, 2018, at 17:09, Andres Freund <andres at anarazel.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 2018-03-26 16:44:05 -0700, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith wrote: >>> The second approach is to *not* cache modules but re-read them from disk >>> (or memory, but that's irrelevant here). That works without any sort of >>> asserts, but "leaks" memory

Suppose that I have the following list of lists of frames 'root' (let's call it a 'tree' of frames). I want to flatten it to be a list of frames. However, if I unlist(root), it will flatten the frames as well. Is there a simply way to flatten the tree to certain depth? aframe1=data.frame(x=1:3,y=1:3) aframe2=data.frame(u=7:9,v=11:13) aframe3=data.frame(p=3:5,q=6:8)

Hi, On 2018-03-26 16:44:05 -0700, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith wrote: > > The second approach is to *not* cache modules but re-read them from disk > > (or memory, but that's irrelevant here). That works without any sort of > > asserts, but "leaks" memory because everytime a module is re-read from > > disk it re-creates types (cf

> On May 17, 2016, at 1:33 AM, Shi, Steven via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hello, > Let me ask a LTO simple question again. For the llvm LTO example in the link:http://llvm.org/docs/LinkTimeOptimization.html <http://llvm.org/docs/LinkTimeOptimization.html>, I use below build commands to generate three different optimization level binary: -O0, -O1, -O2.

Hi all: I've looked in the archives and seen several refernces to this error message but no solution put forth. I'm running samba 3.0.0 rc2 on RedHat 9. The following shows up for each of my users in the syslog: Sep 8 15:17:14 main2 smbd[31974]: get_domain_user_groups: primary gid of user [nsb] is not a Domain group ! Sep 8 15:17:14 main2 smbd[31974]: get_domain_user_groups: You

so I gave up on bonding. I found about 300 posts showing eth0 and eth1 both pointing to br0 (bridge) as interfaces. I followed them correctly, or so I thought. I pointed both ethx to the bridge, restarted network and bam...!!! entire ip block went out. when I called datacenter they told me the router was under attack and I was like 'uh oh' and told them to just shut off my computer I

Thanks for testing out LLVM PGO and evaluated the performance. We are currently still more focused on infrastructure improvement which is the foundation for performance improvement. We are making great progress in this direction, but there are still some key missing pieces such as profile data in inliner etc. We are working on that. Once those are done, more focus will be on making more passes

This is a silly question, but I am in a situation where I need to build x86 and arm assembly sources for some sources while the rest will be built with C. I do know that just adding `-fembed-bitcode` to a C sources would embed bitcode, but doing the same for the assembly files will not do that (at least, it will add the 1-byte `_LLVM,__asm` section, but not the `__LLVM,__bitcode` section).

Am 17.06.24 um 16:06 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >> The user is member of "domain admins", isn't that enough? > > No, because they would be classed as 'others'. > >> >> Or does "SYNC_ACL" not yet work OK, because we miss the steps in >> >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs >>

> On Mar 23, 2018, at 16:11, Andres Freund via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > (sorry if the CC's are inappropriate, they seemed relevant based on a > git log of IRMover.cpp) > > I'm using LLVM to implement Just-in-Time compilation for PostgreSQL. One > part of that is doing inlining of operators. For that I'm using bitcode

Hi, (sorry if the CC's are inappropriate, they seemed relevant based on a git log of IRMover.cpp) I'm using LLVM to implement Just-in-Time compilation for PostgreSQL. One part of that is doing inlining of operators. For that I'm using bitcode pre-generated using clang. The current code uses a single LLVMContext & Orc to generate the code. That largely workes well. But inlining

Hello!!! I try use GLusterFS + openvz, but gfs process every 1 minute memory usare increase at ~2MB. How i can fix this? P.S. sorry about my bad english. Cluster information: 1) 3 nodes (server-client), conf: ############## # local data # ############## volume vz type storage/posix option directory /home/local end-volume volume vz-locks type features/posix-locks subvolumes vz end-volume

So if this is done, is edns configure also ? ? in resolv.conf add: options edns0 ? and, name.conf test these. ? ??????? //?The forwarded zone to the AD-DC DNS use these also. ????????//dnssec-must-be-secure?internal.domain.tld no; ????????//dnssec-must-be-secure 168.192.in-addr.arpa no; ????????// listen-on-v6 { ::1; };? // test what works best, if not all?ipv6 is disabled also?enable this

Am 19.06.24 um 11:35 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > Am 17.06.24 um 16:06 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > >>> The user is member of "domain admins", isn't that enough? >> >> No, because they would be classed as 'others'. >> >>> >>> Or does "SYNC_ACL" not yet work OK, because we miss the steps in

In the Agile WD book it states regarding sesion data- "Rails uses the cookie-based approach". This can''t be entirely true can it ? Not that I''m complaining if it was but isn''t there some equivalent to say, PHP sessions ? Or am I wrong. Stuart -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Admittedly this is probably pretty stupid of me, but there are just some things I can't understand by reading documentation. Any suggestions or recommendations about how to handle my problem are greatly appreciated. I'm trying to achieve the same functionality as my Nortel PBX, without rewriting much 'C' code. In my dialplan I'd like to compare two variables as a means of

Hello all, I have a clerk connect box running at my library and it is based on RH9. I am having a little trouble with resolving URLs. I have two nics in it. eth0 with an Internet connection and and eth1 which is my inhouse LAN. Now I can ping IPs on the Lan, and On the net but I can not ping URL's (www.yahoo.com) now I do have an entry in resolv.conf nameserver xxx.xxx.xx.xxx and this

Hi Umesh, Thank you for the suggestion. I can use the "Brute force method " to narrow down the LTO wrong instructions here and there, but I still don't know why these wrong instructions are generated, and how to let Clang LTO don't generate those wrong instructions. I suspect the wrong code is caused by some LTO wrong optimization pass, so I hope to disable all optimizations in

hi all, currently my websites are sharing one server, also having bind running on that server for all of them. I am now breaking the sites on to different machines. So what would you do on bond/dns? I was thinking of making two servers as nameservers, one master, one slave, for all my domains. For resolution of the server itself I was originally going to make a recursive caching nameserver

[moved from -dev, as the thread is better suited for -users] At 5:10 PM -0600 1/30/04, James Sharp wrote: > > I've pretty much got the routing covered at this point, I'm just not sure >> how to get the Asterisk system to answer and give me dialtone immediately. >> Any ideas or recommendations would be greatly appreciated. > >app_disa will give answer and give