similar to: Problems with Intel Ethernet and module e1000e

Hi all, We have a development server we have just tried updating the kernel & glibc after recent recommendations. Its been stable previously for a few years with only scheduled reboots. Its running Centos 6.6(final) 2.6.32-573.18.1.el6.x86_64 GNU libc 2.12 Upgraded via YUM, rebooted, all fine for several hours, and then network seemed to hang. Not much happening as its a dev server we are

> Date: Friday, February 19, 2016 11:08:48 +0000 > From: Ian B <ibrierley at gmail.com> > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Ian B <ibrierley at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> We have a development server we have just tried updating the >> kernel & glibc after recent recommendations. Its been stable >> previously for a few

Just noticed that in the trace, it shows an old kernel, so I don't think grub was automatically selecting the latest kernel. Just wondering what process updates the default to be the latest kernel, and if a problem could be an update but grub selecting an older kernel, but other packages updated ? On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Ian B <ibrierley at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, >

Thanks Richard, We currently do all security updates at short notice (as opposed to everything), via a script. I've amended the grub config and rebooted to make sure it will reboot into the correct kernel now, and yes /etc/sysconfig/kernel was different to production servers. We may try all packages if it continues to be unstable now and maybe whatever as its on a dev server to test. Thanks

> Date: Friday, February 19, 2016 12:47:54 +0000 > From: Ian B <ibrierley at gmail.com> > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Richard wrote: > >> > Date: Friday, February 19, 2016 11:08:48 +0000 >> > From: Ian B <ibrierley at gmail.com> >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Ian B <ibrierley at gmail.com> >> >

Hi, one of our rented root-server has a problem with the network-adapter.The network is interrupted from time to time and i can not longer connect to our server. We can only reboote (remote) the server and restart the network. I think it was an network-driver-problem from an "Intel Corporation 82574L Gigabit Network" --- e1000e But now i have install a new kernel-driver and i have

One of the more promising solutions I'm looking at for my dual-ethernet dual-monitor workstation contains an Intel 82574L Ethernet controller. I found a LOT of postings regarding a bug in the driver for this controller: http://www.doxer.org/learn-linux/resolved-intel-e1000e-driver-bug-on-82574l-ethernet-controller-causing-network-blipping/ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632650

a previously rock solid reliable server of mine crashed last night, the server was still running but eth0, a Intel 82574L using the e1000e driver, went down. The server has a Supermicro X8DTE-F (dual Xeon X5650, yada yada). server is a drbd master, so that was the first thing to notice network issues. Just a couple days ago I ran yum update to the latest, I do this about once a month.

Network stopped just out of the blue leaving this backtrace After this or during this my network switch just stopped working ang got stuck. Maybe the switch made the problem? Thanks, Eliezer Feb 1 04:07:15 localhost kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------ Feb 1 04:07:15 localhost kernel: WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:261 dev_watchdog+0x26d/0x280() (Not tainted) Feb 1 04:07:15

Hi, i want to port an open-source project to sparc. I just downloaded OpenSolaris (sol-nv-b75-sparc-...iso), created an empty image for the hard disk, and tried to start qemu in a linux x64bit-host: qemu-system-sparc -hda test.img -cdrom sol-nv-b75-sparc-v1.iso -boot d -nographic The output says: Nvram id QEMU_BIOS, version 1 CPUs: 1 nvram error detected, zapping pram Welcome to OpenBIOS

Hello, I am observing a performance degradation (of about 100 Mbps dropl) between two domUs on different hosts when I set the MTU on dom0 to anything > 1500. The domUs are still configured with MTU of 1500, so effectively there isn''t any traffic with bigger MTU ever generated. And the network is jumbo frame capable. Furthermore, when I check the interrupts/second for dom0 using

At ~07:40 (UTC-4:00) this morning our gateway host lost its WAN Ethernet adaptor. Subsequent to recovery, which required a reboot, the following entries were find in /var/log/messages: Jun 6 07:39:50 gway02 kernel: PING_FLOOD: IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:25:90:61:74:c0:00 :24:14:2b:f2:80:08:00 SRC=74.205.112.125 DST=216.185.71.33 LEN=64 TOS=0x00 PREC= 0x00 TTL=50 ID=30954 PROTO=ICMP TYPE=8 CODE=0

Everyone, Most of the time I am over my head in trying to troubleshoot problems. However, after reading manuals, man pages, and getting advice from this list I have been able to work my way through difficulties, and at the end, I usually have a better understanding of what 'is going on'. I can only hope this method will work on this problem too. I have been chasing a problem with a

On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 16:46 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > The problem here is that in some of the problematic cases the virtio > driver may not even be loaded.? If someone runs an L1 guest with an > IOMMU-bypassing virtio device and assigns it to L2 using vfio, then > *boom* L1 crashes.? (Same if, say, DPDK gets used, I think.) > > > > > The only way out of this while

On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 16:46 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > The problem here is that in some of the problematic cases the virtio > driver may not even be loaded.? If someone runs an L1 guest with an > IOMMU-bypassing virtio device and assigns it to L2 using vfio, then > *boom* L1 crashes.? (Same if, say, DPDK gets used, I think.) > > > > > The only way out of this while

Hello, I have been using Xen on a Debian Lenny server for quite some time. I decided to build a new Dom0 using identical hardware, but newest version of Xen from repositories with Debian Squeeze. I attempting to create a new DomU on the new host which is similar to an existing DomU running on the older Lenny host. The DomU is a three NIC firewall. Two of the NICs are virtualized. One NIC is a

Em seg, 7 de out de 2019 ?s 04:51, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> escreveu: > > On Sun, Oct 06, 2019 at 03:45:15PM -0300, jcfaracco at gmail.com wrote: > > From: Julio Faracco <jcfaracco at gmail.com> > > > > To enable dev_watchdog, virtio_net should have a tx_timeout defined > > (.ndo_tx_timeout). This is only a skeleton to throw a warn message.

I'm trying to install libguestfs on Debian squeeze installed from http://people.debian.org/~bengen/libguestfs/ It does not work. Here are the details: I was able to install libguestfs-tools and its dependencies. However, aptitude removed the following two packages: qemu and qemu-system. I'm not sure if it's okay or not. If I try to install those packages back, I get the

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57034 Priority: medium Bug ID: 57034 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: [Quadro FX 4800] display port connectors not recognized QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All)

On 2/14/23 08:49, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 1/29/23 11:24, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> It seems that thunderbird-102.7.1-1.el8 (at least on CentOS Stream) broke >> OAuth authentication with outlook.office365.com.? Downgrading to >> 102.4.0-1.el8 resolved the issue. >> >> Error console reports: >> >> XHR POST